Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We Were Right! Bolton! Bolton! Bolton!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:57 PM
Original message
We Were Right! Bolton! Bolton! Bolton!
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 12:59 PM by Crisco
Per Josh Marshall, on the indictment:

Top of the list: who do you figure the "Under Secretary of State" (p.4) was who seems to have worked closely with Libby in getting information on Wilson?

Hint: Look at the org chart at the State Department and whose purview the State Dept intel shop, INR, falls under.


He is SO fucked! This is the information the White House refused to give up during Bolton's confirmation hearings. A few of us DUers speculated that Bolton was somehow tied into this at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. I know - I am giddy - I'll be Rove gave him up to save his ass from
an indictment and being forced to resign when Bush is so crippled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Yes! I think you're right... and this shit is NOT over.
Don't ever forget this: Why did John Bolton visit Judy Miller in jail?

Obstruction of justice much????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. You know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
30. Second Question: Who Sent That State Dept. Memo Ari et al Were Reading ..
on Air Force 1 in July 2003?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. I think it was from Hadley.
I'll go double check.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Wrong. It was Richard Armitage who asked to send it to Powell.
Which is how it got onto the plane to Africa.


http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/16/politics/16memo.html?pagewanted=2&ei=5090&en=99bfd110bd325456&ex=1279166400&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss

The memorandum was dated June 10, 2003, nearly four weeks before Mr. Wilson wrote an Op-Ed article for The New York Times in which he recounted his mission and accused the administration of twisting intelligence to exaggerate the threat from Iraq. The memorandum was written for Marc Grossman, then the under secretary of state for political affairs, and it referred explicitly to Valerie Wilson as Mr. Wilson's wife, according to a government official who reread the document on Friday.

When Mr. Wilson's Op-Ed article appeared on July 6, 2003, a Sunday, Richard L. Armitage, then deputy secretary of state, called Carl W. Ford Jr., the assistant secretary for intelligence and research, at home, a former State Department official said. Mr. Armitage asked Mr. Ford to send a copy of the memorandum to Mr. Powell, who was preparing to leave for Africa with Mr. Bush, the former official said. Mr. Ford sent it to the White House for transmission to Mr. Powell.

It is not clear who asked for the memorandum, but in the weeks before it was written, there were several accounts in newspapers about an unnamed former diplomat's trip to Africa seeking intelligence about Iraq's nuclear program. On May 6, 2003, Nicholas D. Kristof, a columnist for The Times, wrote of a "former U.S. ambassador to Africa" who had reported to the C.I.A. and the State Department that reports of Iraq seeking to acquire uranium in Niger were "unequivocally wrong."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. why else would he personally visit Miller in prison?
trying to get the stories straight.

Hey, anyone hear anything from Miller about the indictment?
Or has the NYT done the right thing about the write thing? (fired her, I mean)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. YAHOOOO
I'm happier about this than about Libby!!! Bolton = Mr. X???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antonialee839 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. Me too, especially since Monkey went ahead like gangbusters
and installed Bolton during a recess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. Could be
Or Bolton could be a trail to Mr. X. :shrug: I also think that Bolton was put in the UN to give misinformation and destroy them from the inside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. A new grand jury and the Bush/Cheney cabal's dirty laundry
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 01:00 PM by Pithy Cherub
exposed for the entire freaking planet to see! Bolton has to be sitting on pins and needles! Just lovin' it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ToolTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ki Yi Yippy Yippy Yea!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. What was Hadley's position?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Hadley Was In Condi's Departmment
NSA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. I thought I read something the other day saying he was in State.
That had me confused as I know he reported to Dr. Lies. Heck, he's the one pretty much solely responsible for those "16 words" being in the SotU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jara sang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. And Bolton got it from his former Deputy at USAID
Laura Dietrich, she knows Plame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
insane_cratic_gal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. I agree
He had means and motive they refused to release that information knowing full well they'd have to appoint him because he'd never be confirmed.

In the mean time what sort of damage has he done at the UN?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #7
44. Bolton's damage
He has already tried a Rethug maneuver by holding a vote late at night and "not inviting everyone to the table", thankfully he didn't get away with it... but i would expect many DIRTY tricks from him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. Dana Bash started to say his name and stopped herself!!
Just moments ago on CNN. She said, "Some speculate the under-secretary may have been... actually, we'll leave it at that."

I spit out my beer! (Yep, cracked one open. It's Fitzmastime!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QuettaKid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. don't forget Bolton was one of the
first people to visit judy in jail...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Exactly. Bolton visited Judy. OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE?
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 01:05 PM by VolcanoJen
Witness Tampering?

This shit is NOT over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
25. Oh yes!
That's right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Daaaaaaaaaaaaayum!!!!!!!
Well, looks like we've got a full blown scandal on our hands.

The question is, will the corporate media report on it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
39. Hey pass me a cold one ! Let's hope Fitz looks into
why all this took place to begin with...The Spider's Web
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=03/12/17/1615235

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
13. The State dept. revealing information about the CIA is suspicious
looking without getting into the details.

If Cheney or Libbey had a legitimate right to know, wouldn't they go to the CIA and get it firsthand? Did they not want to alert the CIA to upcoming shenanigans?

What was said to the Undersecretary that prompted him to reveal that?
Why was the question even asked?

Enable a smear campaign seems at least a possibility.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. Bye bye - Fucker - make that 2 down n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
16. Thank You! I have been saying that for MONTHS now
They were holding those papers a little too tightly and they wanted him appointed a little too lustfully ... yes, lustfully!

You are getting nailed too Bolton. Believe it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
17. Sweet Jesus. Way to go, Crisco.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
18. NOMINATE this, so it doesn't get lost in all the noise! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. This is HUGH!111, SERIES111!!!!, and I nominated.
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 01:14 PM by VolcanoJen
I think Mr. UN Ambassador might just be the smoking fuckin' gun in all of this.

It begs the question... by appointing him in recess, did Bush purposefully avoid Congressional discovery of Bolton's involvement in the Plame affair?

Remember, they wouldn't hand those damned papers over to Congress. And then they appointed him anyway.

This really is huge. And serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. They Were Bonkers to Put Him Forward!
It really does speak volumes about the amazing arrogance - and overreach - of the * administration, that they pushed him into the ambassador nomination knowing he was going to have to be confirmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
19. Question...
This is all going by so fast. Page 4 of what? The indictment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. Yep. The full Adobe pdf here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catmandu57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
26. Good I want to see them drag his maggoty ass
from the UN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mimitabby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
28. is there a link?
a source of some kind that i can read? thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. Talking Points Memo
http://talkingpointsmemo.com

Once DU traffic goes down, search functions will return.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jara sang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
34. Post regarding Bolton and his associates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyorDeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
35. If I were Libby I'd be requesting Protective Custody right about now.
It's a good day ! :toast:

There's more coming Libby's the lynch pin

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
36. Yes!!! Here's a thread from Friday on exactly this: Bolton's involvement
in the WMD lies and most likely in the outing of Plame. Good articles relating to this in the replies as well as the OP of this thread:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x5199939
thread title: State told Libby of agent's identity_ Richard Sale on Bolton, Fleitz,Wurms

And when Bolton visited Judith Miller in jail, that just nailed it. He didn't have to SAY anything incriminating, his mere presence there would have had a chilling effect of reminding her of the consequences if those rotten aspen roots didn't stay connected.

Merry Fitzmas indeed!!!!! :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
37. PERMALINK for the Josh Marshall (Talking Points Memo) post in the OP:
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/006878.php

It's just a short entry, but so important! Don't miss the many other entries at the site, many of them put up after the one discussed in the current thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
40. co-signators of PNAC, the lot of them!
it will be interesting to see how many of them go down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsKandice01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. Yep...every last one of them...
PNAC needs to be taken DOWN!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsKandice01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
41. If Bolton goes down, I will be satisfied...Rove or no Rove
That fucker deserves what's coming to him...abusive asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeanQ Donating Member (515 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
43. Here's hoping Fitz can get the info he needs to bring him to justice!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC