Seen the light
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 12:58 PM
Original message |
Cheney statement on CNN: Libby is capable, intelligent, and trusted |
|
Ah this continues to be great.
|
Supersedeas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 12:59 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Brownie is doing a heckuva job |
deadparrot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
jillan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 01:00 PM
Response to Original message |
3. What a scumbag - going to let his #1 trusted aide take the fall |
|
How do these assholes sleep at nite?
|
Roland99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 01:01 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Capable of Lying. Intelligent enough to Lie well for 2 years. >>> |
|
Trusted enough to perjure himself to try and protect Mr. Pacemaker.
|
ticapnews
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 01:02 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I think that's the problem...he was trusted. With secret information. A trust he broke. He is a traitor, whether a jury ever says so or not.
|
sallyseven
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
9. He didn't break the trust with cheney. |
|
he was expected to leak the information. That is his job under the mafia family in the white house. Smear, smear, smear.
|
Lone_Star_Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 01:03 PM
Response to Original message |
6. And... a Liar and Obstructer of Justice. |
|
I'm sure that omission was just an oversight. :eyes:
|
Long Time Lurker
(33 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 01:04 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Don't believe a word they say |
|
Their lips don't move, but their puppets dance anyway.
|
kurth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 01:08 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Yep, go fuck yerself, dickhead... |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 01:35 AM
Response to Original message |