Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

That talking point won't fly

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:51 PM
Original message
That talking point won't fly
Hope Hutchison is listening. Tell them Fitzy!! The truth is the engine of the system. Love it!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. which talking point??? missed it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That perjury, etc., are only "technicalities." nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. lol seconds apart..."technicality"
talking point form the GOP echo chamber....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Perjury is a serous charge all its own. So, the r-w talking point that
you shouldn't indict on that basis alone is a none starter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. Definitely a question based on what KBH said. I hope
she's listening and squirming!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. I sure was listening and thinking to myself
smack - down - kay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. You know I have to wonder
why men of this caliber aren't the men sitting on the Supreme Court.
So many professionals with integrity are rarely seen while morons fill our TVs and government spaces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. He didn't hesitate one second before answering that question.
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 02:20 PM by Straight Shooter
These reporters, some of them, give me the impression they're asking questions of Ken Starr. Fitzgerald is not going to go beyond the boundaries of law, he is not going to intimate or suggest information that leads to rampant speculation. He is not giving the press any fodder on which to chow down. On the flip side, the White House is not getting any clues on how they should proceed, either.

Fitzgerald is the most circumspect public figure I have ever witnessed. He's like a breath of cool fresh air in an otherwise polluted forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rufus T. Firefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. You know he's been waiting to have an opportunity to respond.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spuddonna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
10. That was my favorite line from the whole news conference! :)
Well, that and the mention that the sentence could be up to 30 years in prison, plus fines which could top out at $1.25 million...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC