Proud2BAmurkin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 02:00 PM
Original message |
Fitz keeps emphasizing perjury/obstruction in NATIONAL SECURITY breach |
|
He's nailing the scumbag rePUKES to the wall on their "technicality" talking point by saying NATIONAL SECURITY was the issue in the investigation and that NATIONAL SECURITY requires LIARS be prosecuted for LYING in NATIONAL SECURITY investigations
|
ayeshahaqqiqa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 02:07 PM
Response to Original message |
|
He's saying that the lying hurt ALL of us-its a serious breach of public trust. He's stressing how bad this really is.
|
FreedomAngel82
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 02:09 PM by FreedomAngel82
Maybe this could be a clue as to what he has in mind. :shrug: I didn't watch all of it but what I did watch he talked about national security quite a good bit.
|
Loonman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 02:09 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Well it is a national security issue |
HereSince1628
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 02:10 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Essentially he is saying perjury provides a penalty |
|
that is equally as serious as the crime the perjury cover up.
That might be true in a legal sense but it certainly isn't on the street.
For the publicy lying isn't seen as serious battery, robbery, murder etc.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:03 PM
Response to Original message |