Francine Frensky
(870 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 02:41 PM
Original message |
WHY did nobody ask about CHENEY??? |
|
The press should have asked the big question sitting there in black and white in the indictment: Cheney gets the information about Plame and passes it along to Libby.
ISN'T THAT A CRIME? Fitz said plainly that Plame's name was classified information. So wouldn't it be a crime for Cheney to pass that down to Libby?
|
Shakespeare
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 02:42 PM
Response to Original message |
1. He was asked about Cheney. |
|
And he refused to comment, which was exactly the right response.
|
OldLeftieLawyer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 02:43 PM
Response to Original message |
2. He can't answer anything about Cheney |
|
The investigation is ongoing, so he's not going to comment.
|
deadparrot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 02:43 PM
Response to Original message |
3. They did...he couldn't answer. nt |
longship
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 02:44 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Because Fitz clearly said at the outset that he wouldn't answer those Ques |
|
He said he could not talk about people other than Libby, or about crimes other than those charged today. He was *very* clear about that.
|
onenote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 02:44 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Libby had clearance, so passing to him isn't enough |
|
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 02:45 PM by onenote
If Cheney passed it to Libby with the knowledge and intent of a scheme to have it disclosed publicly --- that would be the way to hook in Cheney.
onenote
|
naturalselection
(236 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 02:45 PM
Response to Original message |
6. According to the indictments |
|
as far as I can tell, Libby had security clearance and I assume Cheney had security clearance. Therefore, they can discuss classified information. Giving that information to a person that does not have clearance is illegal.
This is how I read the indictments. If I am wrong, someone verify.
|
Ediacara
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 02:46 PM
Response to Original message |
7. He would give them the same answer |
|
"I can't comment on anyone not listed on the indictments..." etc
|
bowens43
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 02:47 PM
Response to Original message |
8. He would only comment on the indictment. |
seabeyond
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 02:49 PM
Response to Original message |
9. the man has integrity adn follows the law. wasnt going to talk |
|
about anyone that was not indicted and no info that was beyond the four corners of the indictment. period. he would be breaking the law.
gosh i liked this man
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:17 PM
Response to Original message |