Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can someone make me feel better about all this please?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 03:12 PM
Original message
Can someone make me feel better about all this please?
Everyone seems to be spinning it all one way or the other. I'm trying to focus on what Fitzgerald said, and it sure seemed like he was giving the impression that this whole thing is going to be over soon. The "sand in the baseball umpire's eyes" analogy made me think that he just feels he can't prove anything one way or another. Is there any other way to read the umpire analogy?

I didn't get the impression that he's continuing the investigation, following new leads, going after the Niger doc forgeries.

Maybe I just didn't have enough coffee today. Can someone make me feel better about this? Tell me it was all a smokescreen and he is about to issue a bunch more indictments. !? Tell me there's a new GJ opening to continue the investigation (i've heard differing reports on this).

And what the heck happened with Rove? two days ago he was about to go down and so was Cheney. now he's showing up in public and smiling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. take a break, tune in to Big Eddie Schultz
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 03:19 PM by dweller
he's rockin and ranting right now.

dp

edit: he's live in Columbus OH, had Paul Hackett on earlier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NervousRex Donating Member (958 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. I hear you....
I got the impression that Libby's lies successfully effed up the leak investigation, so Fitzgerald is throwing the book at him. I hope this is not the case, but that baseball analogy sounded like that's what he was trying to say....time will tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That's what I got, also. Sounds like we won't know until Libby is found
guilty or innocent. If he's found guilty then we still might not know.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. I fear the p word. the saddest thing is the repukes just don't get it.
They are willing to expose life long dedicated cia agents to protect their PNAC agenda. He can throw the book at him, but without a fair court and the chance of pardons, I fear treasonous business as usual.

It appeared that MSM saw the light, but now seeing that the damage is not as bad as hyped, they appear to climb back in bed with the TREASONOUS THUGS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. I agree with your impression
I think Rove is off the hook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BikeWriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. IMO, we have two choices...
1. We can be upbeat about this, take the victory we got, and hope for more.
2. We can be defeatists, say Rove is off the hook, and some pressure is immediately off our enemies.
I choose the first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. I'm not being defeatist. I'm pretty pleased with Libby indictment.
I never expected such idiotic bold-faced lying to the grand jury! So I'm feeling pretty upbeat about it really. Certainly, I hope Rove is indicted. I also hope the US military pulls out of Iraq ASAP. But hope doesn't preclude realism about likelihood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BikeWriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. The thing I'm most realistic about is...
we have to defeat * and soon if America is to survive as anything but a third world country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleClarkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. Look at the words you're using
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 03:33 PM by LittleClarkie
"seemed like he was giving the impression"

No concrete words.

You are interpreting what YOU think is going on. Try to open your mind to other possibilities, and also realize that we will know more as we go along.

Fitz is one closed-mouth son of a bitch. Give it more of a wait and see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kralizec Donating Member (982 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. The sand analogy was in reference to what
Libby did. He threw sand in the Umps (Fitz) face, when Fitz was trying to figure out the right call. In other words, the Ump has cleared his eyes, charges the player with throwing sand in his face, and will now continue to figure out why the hell the pitcher hit the batter in the head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. That's what I got out of it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lannes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. A recap of what Ive posted earlier
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 03:46 PM by Lannes
Hope it helps.It was reported that Fitz was investigating the Italian Embassy/Niger forgery connection and its relation to the White House.

He made a point of saying that if he discovers a possible crime its his duty to prosecute regardless of whether it has anything to do with the original charge which is what happened with the indictments handed out today.

Maybe he has found something bigger and needs more time to check it out.

Its was also reported that he just leased a larger office across the street from where he is now.If things were wrapping up why does he need the extra room? I dont know if it will lead to anything but it shows that there is still a chance that it could go higher.

edited for clarity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. the story about the office lease has been dubunked
that's my worry. if we take him on his word alone, he is wrapping up the investigation and he's almost done. He did not say anything about "needing more time" to investigate more leads. At least I didn't hear him say anthing like that. Maybe I missed something. People keep saying here that he said he "needs more time." I didn't hear that at all. I think a lot of the rumors and leaks we've been reading over the last 2 weeks have turned out to be false, from the office lease to the 22 indictments. To me he really seemed like a man who was finishing up a 2-year investigation, and glad to be almost done.

one other thing that was bothersome - he said specifically that Libby's indictment is a good message to the world - that here in the US people are accountable to the law and we do have justice. To me, the Libby indictment alone is anything but that. The real criminals are still walking. If this is all that happens the message to the world is that we have some thugs running our country and there's nothing we can do about it.

sorry if I'm being negative. I hope I'm wrong. I hope he's got a dozen more indictments coming. But he really seems like a straight shooter and he was giving the message to all of us that there's going to be a trial for Libby's indictment, but not much more than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. the "sand in the eyes" analogy is used to justify the obstruction
charges and also to explain why no one has (yet) been charged under the Espionage Act or the IIPA. The "sand" has made intent difficult to discern. I did not get the impression that things are over. He would like for things to be over soon, but he made noise on more than one occasion that made it sound like he's still going to need to have a grand jury handy "just in case". You don't need that if all you're doing is finishing some paperwork.

As for Rove, I don't gauge his situation by his actions or his lawyer's words/actions. It's all for show. Ditto Cheney. They're still in deep shit, or somebody is. If not, Fitzgerald could have definitely said he was folding up his tent today and he did not say that. Today was a somewhat arbitrary deadline, dictated by how long he could hold the current grand jury, so I think Fitzgerald went for the most rock-solid indictments he had and intends to leverage off of those. I think he may have intended to indict Rove today as well, but has not. There must have been some last-minute plea deal-making and Rove is going to testify against others in the White House.

I won't believe it's over until Fitzgerald says he's completely done and he didn't say that today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
12. YES!!! From the transcript:
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 05:48 PM by meganmonkey
QUESTION: What can you say about what you're still working on then?


FITZGERALD: I can't. I don't mean that fliply, but the grand jury doesn't give an announcement about what they're doing, what they're looking at, unless they charge an indictment.FITZGERALD: I can tell you that no one wants this thing to be over as quickly as I do, as quickly as Mr. Eckenrode does. I'd like to wake up in my bed in Chicago, he'd like to wake up in his bed in Philadelphia, and we recognize that we want to get this thing done.


I will not end the investigation until I can look anyone in the eye and tell them that we have carried out our responsibility sufficiently to be sure that we've done what we could to make intelligent decisions about when to end the investigation. We hope to do that as soon as possible. I just hope that people will take a deep breath and just allow us to continue to do what we have to do.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I lean toward optimism. That last sentence says something, and we know this guy doesn't give up info. He is not saying one way or another, he is leaving all doors open. That's how I read it anyway. I guess we won't know for a while (yikes!!).

I just hope that people will take a deep breath and just allow us to continue to do what we have to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
garybeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. funny how two people can read the same thing and
have completely different impressions of the intent. I read that over and over and it really seems to me that he's wrapping it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. He clearly says it isn't done and he won't stop until it is
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 06:11 PM by meganmonkey
and he is one persistent dude. In one of his previous cases which grew in scope and indictments over time, he eventually got a former governor indicted:

"The investigation, dubbed Operation Safe Road, initially focused on bribes exchanged for licenses for unqualified truck drivers when Ryan was secretary of state. It expanded into a broader investigation of political corruption that snared several of his top aides and associates.

Ryan became the 66th person charged in the investigation; 59 people and his campaign committee have been convicted so far. "

http://www.nbc5.com/news/2710256/detail.html

He doesn't seem to give up easily. But really, only time will tell...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
17. That remark was ONLY in relation to motive ie. outing a CIA agent
deliberately. He didn't have the evidence to charge on that ONE issue.

Chill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlyvi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
18. Less than one year ago.....
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 06:21 PM by charlyvi
Shrub was re-elected and claiming a mandate. He was on the verge of screwing Social Security, at least half the nation felt he was an honest, moral, upright true Christian who would bring "integrity" back to the WH.

Today, his numbers are circling the bowl. His mandate is over (although we always knew how fictional that "mandate" crap really was); he can't even get his hand picked SC nominee in committee, let alone voted on. The chief of staff of his VP has been indicted; the war is groaning on and on--and people are in rebellion against it. His christofascists are showing their hand publically. Heating oil this winter will probably be exhorbitant costwise and his Senate just vetoed a help bill for the elderly and poor. People are definitely realizing this so called conservative movement is nothing but greed, selfishness and corporate welfare.

All of this in just 11 months. How could you not feel better?

on edit: and I've probably left out a shitload of other ways his administration is failing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BikeWriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. A great post! The bastid's have screwed themselves. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
European Socialist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
19. I feel the same way. Better than nothing, But won't bring Bush/Cheney down
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
20. Are you Hans Moleman?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
21. Here's how I interpret Fitzgerald's comments:
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 06:39 PM by Marr
Some of the additional charges that deal directly with the leaking of classified information speak to the motivations of the person who passed on the information, and what that person knew at the time the information was imparted. Those aspects would be very difficult to prove legally, however suspicious the situation seems.

What *is* provable is that Libby 'threw sand in the umpire's eyes', or tried to misdirect the investigation, and so he faces some very real legal consequences.

That's how I interpret Fitzgerald's comments. Now, Libby may offer up more information in an attempt to lighten his legal burden, and he may not. I suspect he won't, since the trial won't get underway for months, and will last for some time- even without any amazing stalling on the part of Libby's lawyer.

It's reasonable to think that Bush will simply pardon him on his way out of the WH. His own father did something similar for Reagan's criminals without even suffering much public criticism- and unlike the old man, Jr. will be leaving politics for good anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC