Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fitzgerald expands probe, believes he can get Rove on more serious charges

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 03:52 PM
Original message
Fitzgerald expands probe, believes he can get Rove on more serious charges
http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Fitzgerald_expands_probe_believes_he_can_1028.html

In one of the boldest moves yet in the 22-month investigation into the outing of a covert CIA agent to a handful of top reporters covering the White House, Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald is extending his probe and pursuing much more serious charges against senior White House officials, specifically President Bush’s Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove, lawyers directly involved in the case told RAW STORY Friday.

While many people were left confused by news reports that said Rove wouldn't be indicted Friday, the lawyers said that Rove remains under intense scrutiny and added that Fitzgerald is betting on the fact that he can secure an indictment against Rove on charges of perjury, obstruction of justice, the misuse of classified information, and possibly other charges, as early as next week.

“This investigation is not yet over,” one of the lawyers in the case said. “You must keep in mind that people like Mr. Rove are still under investigation. Rather than securing an indictment on perjury charges against Mr. Rove Mr. Fitzgerald strongly believes he can convince the grand jury that he broke other laws.”

The lawyers said that in the past month Fitzgerald has obtained explosive information in the case that has enabled him to pursue broader charges such as conspiracy, and civil rights violations against targets like Rove. Specifically, the lawyers said Fitzgerald is focusing on phony intelligence documents that led to the outing of Valerie Plame Wilson’s identity: the documents that claimed Iraq was attempting to purchase yellow-cake uranium from Niger.



http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Fitzgerald_expands_probe_believes_he_can_1028.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Don't believe Raw Story.
They have gotten nothing right. They way over-promised and look at what we got. One indictment, nothing on the leak. No 22 indictments, no conspiracy, no shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. From Raw Story's lips to God's ears!
Oh pleez let it be true.

Rove is the scummiest of the scum.

Sue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hvn_nbr_2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. "he can secure an indictment against Rove...as early as next week"
That doesn't make any sense at all. This grand jury is finished today. He couldn't even empanel a new one by next week, much less present evidence and get an indictment. I think they got that old aphorism backwards and thought it said "A good prosecutor can get a ham sandwich to indict anyone."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaniqua6392 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. I do not believe Raw Story......
They seemed like the "National Enquirer" of the political world lately. If you go back and look at what they reported over the last week, very little of it was true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. There is a curious thing, though
It was reported that Fitz' went to Rove's lawyers offices (I think this was Tuesday, but it could have been Wednesday) and tried negotiating a deal.

Rove's reps didn't accept it. Which I would think would mean Fitz' asked for something too painful for Rove to accept.

Do you think Fitz' would have offered something tough if he didn't think he had the leverage to get something close to it? I don't.

Rove, didn't get indicted today. The reasons could be what?

1) Fitz' couldn't prove anything against Rove
2) Rove cut a deal and it proved satisfactory to Fitz'
3) Rove is trying to cut a deal, and Fitz' is checking out the value of what Rove offered.

Because of the intensity of negotiation I sort of doubt 1 and 2.
Which leaves me waiting for next week.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. your thinking is the same as mine . . . Official A apparently still in
legal jeopardy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
6. Just wondering... how often is rawstory right? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC