Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why does Andrea Mitchell protect the Administration despite the truth?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:16 PM
Original message
Why does Andrea Mitchell protect the Administration despite the truth?
What are her connections to the Administration?

Does she have a connection (complicity) in this investigation as well?

Very transparent she is trying to be perceived as objective and that's obviously quite a farce. She is trying to put the lid on the ongoing investigation and thats not journalism, thats paid propaganda that we are paying for. I don't care to hear her lies and push for an Administration that has killed so many innocent individuals.

Mitchell is an obvious propagandist and along with others, she needs to be removed from any coverage and replaced with valid journalists. I am growing tired of individuals like herself and Judith Miller and their highly questionable ties to this Administration.

Time to remove the accomplices disguised as journalists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LoKnLoD Donating Member (923 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think she is married to Greenspan ,nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush_Eats_Beef Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Yes she is, and that would be my guess...
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. She cheers with her husband
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtowngman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. you got it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hell, she testified before the grand jury....
Her livelihood is tied to her links to the administration. Just like Judy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Yes. It is so despicable that she is covering this when she's connected.
The definition of immorality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Exactly. It is immoral. It is just as immoral for Russert, for Tweety,
for Miller, for Hughes, for Matalin, for Frist, for anyone who has a self interest in what they are reporting on (if they are involved how can they possibly be objective?), or what they are voting on or cheerleading for. This media expresses perfectly the corruption of the B* administration. Truth makes no money unless its tied to some sort of sensationalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. They've been doing it for 2 years and it didn't stop Fitz.
Plus, she's really bad at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldtime dfl_er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. slightly off topic but
if she uses the empty filler phrase "if you will" one more time Im going to throw myself off a building.

http://www.cafepress.com/scarebaby/940882
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. This help?




She is fat and happy w/ the status quo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. Status quo?
I think she's "fat and happy" in her exclusionary world of elitism and over saturated white Anglo hedonism.

-written by white Anglo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. Maybe because she's tied to her husband's 20+ year plot to
make the rich richer, and screw the middle class.

Raise what people pay into Social Security, cut taxes on the rich, tell the middle class they wil have to accept Social Security benefit-cuts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. they are lucky they found each other i suppose
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. Cause she's a RW media WHORE.
Simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. She whored herself out years ago. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. So who was she "before"? A coal miner's daughter?
Or was she born with a silver spoon in her mouth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. beats me but my guess is silver spoon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
14. The Greenspans, Cheneys
and other right wingers regularly go out for dinner together...I read recently...and don't remember where.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Do you ever wonder what they talk about?
Like when is Lynn's next lesbian novel going to hit the shelves and what contracts does Cheney have signed for the upcoming Iranian seige and/or natural disaster?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefty48197 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
19. She's on the payroll
She's one of the ones team Bush is paying to help promote their lunatic agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fla Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
21. This Administration has learned to play the press like a fiddle. They
use the carrot and stick approach to the extreme. Just what has come out in this case is enough to convince you that the press has allowed itself to be used like a cheap whore. If you say something bad about us, then we don't call you with background info. You spread your legs for us and you will be on our priority list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
22. simple...
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 06:02 PM by Neecy
She's a mouthpiece for her withered, elderly Ayn-Randian husband.

Can you say "conflict of interest"? Apparently not at NBC/GE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. I think you're right Neecy. I think it's just about that simple.
G.R.E.E.D.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC