Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fitzgerald gave a lesson on how much Ken Starr broke the law.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:17 PM
Original message
Fitzgerald gave a lesson on how much Ken Starr broke the law.
Remember all the despicable leaks during the Ken Starr investigation?

I think the public just got a civics lesson on just how wrong Starr was in smearing people with leaks.

That part was indeed a breath of fresh air.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. The sanctimonious Starr?
Who always pretended to be cute, innocent, and pure as the driven snow?
Heaven forfend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ready4Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. A liberal version of Starr would have slimed 20 WH staffers on this. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Actually, different laws cover Fitzgerald than the law covering Starr
Starr was an Independent Prosecutor under the Independent Prosecutor law which is no longer in effect.

Fitzgerald is a Special Counsel covered under existing Justice Department statutes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Is that supposed to make some kind of difference in wrongfully
smearing people with leaks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eggman67 Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Legally, yes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I don't thnk Starr was under as much of an onus against leaking
unfortunately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC