Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Libby is only the first???

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
tedzbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:43 PM
Original message
Libby is only the first???
"Mr. Libby's story that he was at the tail end of a chain of phone calls, passing on from one reporter what he heard from another, was not true. It was false," the prosecutor said. "He was at the beginning of the chain of the phone calls, the FIRST official to disclose this information outside the government to a reporter. And he lied about it afterward, under oath, repeatedly."


I find this paragraph very interesting. Sounds like Fitzgerald has evidence of a leak from at least one other top administration official. More will be revealed...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, "FIRST" parses very differently than "ONLY"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LunaC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. The co-conspirators
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 04:50 PM by LunaC
From Fitz's news conference:

"But in early June, Mr. Libby learned about Valerie Wilson and the role she was believed to play in having sent Mr. Wilson on a trip overseas from a senior CIA officer on or around June 11th, from an undersecretary of state on or around June 11th, and from the vice president on or about June 12th.

"It's also clear, as set forth in the indictment, that some time prior to July 8th he also learned it from somebody else working in the Vice President's Office."

With the exception of Tenet, the spotlight is on the WH/PNAC Glee Club of Bolton, Cheney, and Wurmser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Cooper's already published that on July 11 Rover told him Wilson's wife
worked at the Agency and was responsible for his trip. This was the story they were peddling. Cooper's article on what he told the grand jury appeared in Time shortly after he testified, so no secret.

Still want to know, who was Novak's original source? He did talk to Rove but supposedly after someone already told him about Plame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedzbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. CNN legal experts are spinning bullshit!!!
They say Fitzgerald will keep his case strictly focused on Libby's lies, while the defense will try to confuse and overwhelm the jury by bringing in a shit load of political evidence surrounding the case.

This doesn't make sense to me. Cheney must hide the deceit he peddled to Congress while selling his war. If Libby's lawyers intentionally widen the scope of this trial by admitting "behind the scenes" evidence, Fitzgerald can use this to probe deeper into the possible motives behind Libby's lies. He will be able to cross-examine Cheney/Rove/Bush with even more freedom than otherwise.

These CNN experts forget that this is no ordinary criminal trial. There will be mind boggling political ramifications if Fitzgerald himself gets to the bottom of this Cheney orchestrated illegal war. The only way Cheney will be able to hide the deceit behind his war is by lying under oath repeatedly. Eventually, like all liars, he will trip himself up when his lies start to contradict themselves.

Cheney and Libby could potentially be charged with high treason for intentionally selling Congress their phony case for war. That prospect must chill the bones of every Republican in office.

:woohoo:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC