Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

("Official A") - This ain't over folks!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
KerryOn Donating Member (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:33 PM
Original message
("Official A") - This ain't over folks!
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 06:14 PM by KerryOn
On Edit>Page 8< of the indictment text:

>>21. On or about July 10 or July 11, 2003, LIBBY spoke to a senior official in the White House (“Official A”) who advised LIBBY of a conversation Official A had earlier that week with columnist Robert Novak in which Wilson’s wife was discussed as a CIA employee involved in Wilson’s trip. LIBBY was advised by Official A that Novak would be writing a story about Wilson’s wife.

22. Onb or about July 13, 2003 LIBBY flew with the Vice President and others to and from Norfolk, Virginia, on Air Force Two. On his return trip, LIBBY discussed with other officials aboard what LIBBY should say in response to certain pending media inquiries, including questions from Time reporter Matthew Cooper.<<

Official A must be Novac's source unless I missed something in the media reports.

The grand jury knows who "Official A" is, and Libby knows who that is as well. And my bet is that it is Vice President Cheney.

Cheers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redacted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not Rove? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. You're not paying attention.

Official A is Rove.

Cheney doesn't talk to journalists.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KerryOn Donating Member (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Just speculation and hoping. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kikiek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. The president and vp should be forced to testify under oath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I agree!
I don't know why they weren't asked to
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4MoreYearsOfHell Donating Member (943 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Them testify under oath? Are you joking?
That's reserved only for sitting Democratic presidents involved in consensual relations!!!

And if they do, don't you think they will be allowed to go together so they can hold hands and use their 'body language' (a la 911 commission) so they can get their story straight?

All off the record, of course.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Will Cheney be allowed to have his arm up shiznit's ass
like he was a sock puppet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KerryOn Donating Member (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. The Vice President will...
...testify under oath if this goes to trial. There is no doubt in my mind.

And if it doesn't go to trial, then I think Libby will reveal bigger players, and Cheney may have to testify anyway. I don't think Libb is the one the outed Plame. The guilty one is Official A, which is Novac's source.

Again, this is just the beggining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesibria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. Official A is Rove...
i'd bet a beer on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodhue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. But where is evidence Official A committed a crime?
As far as we know Official A unlike Libby came clean and told investigators and grand jury the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KerryOn Donating Member (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Then why are they not letting us know the identity..
of Offical A.

I think Official A outed Valarie. Official A spoke to Novac, not Libby. Official A is Novac's source, not Libby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fla Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. As Fitzgerald said; if they are not bringing charges against someone
they will not release their testimony or names.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KerryOn Donating Member (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Not bring charges now...
Charges may be filed on Official A in the future and that could also be why they will not release the name of Official A.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. would not be called "Official A" if was not in legal jeopardy
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 05:56 PM by emulatorloo
others (who are not in legal jeopardy) are identified by title. ON EDIT I think it is Rove
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KerryOn Donating Member (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. Good someone besides me gets it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
11. can we drug Novak with truth serum?
The source will be known someday...I just hope we find out sooner rather than later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
16. It's obviously Rove but ...
the only thing he seems to have on Rove is that he revealed the info to a reporter.

He explained that it is very difficult to get a conviction on this charge.

It sounds like he will tie up a few loose ends but if some new info doesn't emerge, he won't charge Rove and this chapter if finished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KerryOn Donating Member (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. And that reporter of course is Novak.
Based on the dates and times in the indictment and the fact that they did not reveal the identity of Official A, tells me that this is not over by a long shot.

Five indictments is a lot. This was just not one simple indictment based on a conversation that was forgotten. And this whole mess is no laughing matter.

Since a CIA operative was exposed, what does that do to the national security of our country? Why would our allies trust use with secrete information on terrorism or issues that involve our national security and their security?

This has made the US weaker! We are a super power and some of that power has now been lost because our allies can no longer trust us.

Those responsible should be brought to justice, and I don't care if takes twenty friggin years. If it does take twenty years it will probably only cost 1% of what President Bush has wasted on Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Halliburton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
18. Rawstory: Major papers and AP will report Official A is Rove
I know it's Rawstory, but they have good sources at major papers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KerryOn Donating Member (899 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. I kind of like Raw Story, I just use a little caution....
Actually the identity of Official A is anyone guess. The news media, no matter who they are, knows no more than we do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Halliburton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. ap just reported it's rove
<snip>
Prosecutors identified Rove in the Libby indictment only as "Official A," recounting a conversation he had with Libby about Plame and Wilson in the days just before the CIA operative's identity was revealed. The mention could make Rove a witness at any Libby trial.
<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
21. Official A
Needn't refer to an individual, it can be a term to designate a group. I think it goes to Bolton and the office of the INR. Also, official A is supposedly used when the designee is the target or subject of an investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. A = Rover per AP - now known fact
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC