Fescue4u
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 06:07 PM
Original message |
So they "Martha'ed" him it seems |
|
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 06:10 PM by Fescue4u
They couldnt get him on the actual crime, so they got him for lying about the actual crime. Just like Martha Stewart
Capone'ish in a way.
|
Catch22Dem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 06:08 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Personally, I think the aim is on bigger fish for the actual crime |
|
Bring Libby down with what you got on him alone, save the actual treason for a higher official.
|
skids
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 06:09 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Except now Libby gets to bargain for leniency, rather than the charges.
Also the trial will establish the facts on record that may be needed in other matters.
|
Fescue4u
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
7. That'll be interesting |
|
Because he'll want avoid a trial at all costs (to avoid more information coming out).
But I suspect that during plea bargaining, any leniency will depend on what additional facts he gives up.
|
Kagemusha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 06:09 PM
Response to Original message |
3. No, that's not how it is.. |
|
They couldn't get him on the actual crime BECAUSE he lied about the actual crime, so they went after him for that.
They may still get him on the actual crime later though. Remember, they did charge Martha with the actual crime, but it got thrown out BECAUSE THE JUDGE THOUGHT IT WAS TOO THIN.
And Fitz doesn't like his charges being thrown out.
|
Fescue4u
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
And it makes me think that during sentencing, the sentence should be harder tougher than Marthas
|
bain_sidhe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 06:10 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Kay! Nice to see you here! |
Fescue4u
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 06:22 PM by Fescue4u
And why dont you want to see her?
|
xultar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 06:31 PM
Response to Original message |
applegrove
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-28-05 06:33 PM
Response to Original message |
9. The report on what the damage to "assets" of Brewster - Jennings will |
|
be presented to congress in an after-report... I don't know if we have to wait till Libby's trial is over or not.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:26 PM
Response to Original message |