Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why aren't they really going after Fitz?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:15 PM
Original message
Why aren't they really going after Fitz?
I know, I know, he's objective, fair and balanced. We know that. But that's ot enough to stop the freepers and neocons. The last thing they care about is the truth. They can and WILL trash anything or anyone that gets in their way. Remember the term "swiftboating?"
These "people" are so vile that they will lie about a decorated war hero to prop up a disgrace like *.

Sure, they're afraid that he will come after them. He has power. But did you notice how Delay didn't let a little thing like that stop him when he smeared Judge Earle? The judge certainly has power over Delay, and there is the threat of serious jail time, but Delay still smeared him publicly. He didn't even use a surrogate.

I am somewhat surprised by their response so far. Is anyone else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wookie294 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think BushCo is basically happy with the indictment
It's the best they could have hoped for.

Fitzgerald rolled over. The indictment is lame. It doesn't charge conspiracy and only one person is named. I'm starting to think that Fitz was bought-off by Bush and Company. Seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Jesus Christ, I'm so sick of that
Have you not read that Fitzgerald is continuing the investigation? Once the investigation is over with and it's just Libby on these 5 counts, then fine, complain, but until then, what the hell? Nobody has any clue what might go down next week or the week after that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wookie294 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Fitz said he completed the "bulk" of the investigation
Sorry, I really do hope I'm wrong. I was not impressed by his news conference yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seen the light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Of course he's done the bulk of the investigation
Edited on Sat Oct-29-05 07:38 PM by Seen the light
Have you not heard people speculate that he was close to indicting Rove but wanted a bit more time to get a clearer case and working out deals to present to the grand jury. When the new grand jury starts, how do you know he won't hit Rove very hard?

I mean, I can understand trying to be realistic, but the people that would've complained no matter what happened yesterday that wasn't up to the level of Bush and Cheney being arrested are driving me crazy. It sounds more pessimistic to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wookie294 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I'm more interested in Cheney, not Rove
I thought it was certain that Cheney would be indicted and that a conspiracy would be charged. I hope Rove's new "information" disclosed to Fitz this week will implicate Cheney in the crime. But I agree with Air America's founder who said last night that this thing is OVER. If I'm wrong, I will eat crow on DU and announce my apology! Seriously! I really do hope I eat crow and this thing blows up into a circus!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Who told you that Cheney would be indicted at this time?....
...and if this thing were "over", Fitzgerald would not be putting together a new grand jury.

You'll be eating crow along with one or both of your feet when the smoke clears...this is very far from being over.

Do yourself a favor and do some reading about Watergate from from the time the first arrests were made until Nixon resigned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wookie294 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. I don't trust Fitz
A "new grand jury" is always on stand-by during prosecutions. Don't read too much into it. Here's what Fitz said yesterday....

"I can tell you, the substantial bulk of the work in this investigation is concluded.

"This grand jury's term has expired by statute; it could not be extended. But it's in ordinary course to keep a grand jury open to consider other matters, and that's what we will be doing."

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/28/politics/28text-fitz.html?pagewanted=all

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Whatever. He's proven that he doesn't care what party you come from....
...if you commit a crime, Fitz is going to put you away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. "substantial bulk of the WORK in this investigation"
Meaning, they've gathered most of the info that they need. Now they will be piecing together the evidence that they have collected over the past 2 years to make the case for further indictments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #13
32. Go watch the video
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayctravis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #13
33. The "bulk" of the investigation of the CIA leak.
Scooter kept Fitz from the true information, therefore Libby goes down, schwap, obstructing justice et. al.

That's not to say Fitzgerald couldn't already be on a new investigation. The CIA leak is a corner of the puzzle of something way worse than perjury...(which for you people in the back, has already progressed past what happened to Clinton; he was not indicted).

That's why the WH doesn't come at him. They know he's got their names and they don't know what he's got. Quoth Kenny Rogers; "You've got to know when to hold 'em."

Fitz has a lot of support and won major respect with how he works. That crisp press conference was a marvel. If anything, WHIG got to notice that he doesn't leak information. As anal and secretive as this government has been about covering their shit, you'd think they'd worry a tad about losing a CIA agent and an entire edifice of cover.

Apparently Cheney went messing over there at the CIA in the past couple of years. I can imagine looking over people's shoulder and using his authority to see what was up. That's not the way it's supposed to work. Those times we'd all look up and go "Where's Cheney? Did he die again?" No, he was probably doing stuff and making sure the details weren't publicly known. He got the occasional, "Going in to operate on some blood vessels, but thank goodness he has Health Insurance!" But often it wasn't even announced he was taking a break. I mean, if you want to operate pretty much with Presidential authority and not be under a microscope, freaking VP is the office to have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. The indictment is not lame
And it's just the beginning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
31. The investigation isn't finished
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Their scared..
Edited on Sat Oct-29-05 07:19 PM by Skink
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Hey that was my answer n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. They're happy it's just Libby so far.
Edited on Sat Oct-29-05 07:19 PM by Eric J in MN
If Rove or Cheney are indicted, then TV and blogs will be full of right-wingers trashing Fitzgerald.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. They will and have started already, but his investigation isn't completely
done. Perhaps more shoes to drop.

It's such a "secret" plan to go after him and any indictments, that the planning has already been reported in the media. LOL. Don't have a link at the moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think a guy like Fitz can not be attacked right away via knee jerk
comments. I believe the neocons are plotting something but when you are dealing with an individual such as Fitz then you better do your homework before you start taking pop shots out there. I do think that swiftboating will come but it will take more time since the neocons will want to make sure they have all of their snakes in a row.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm not surprised because bush liked him
and approved of him and now Fitz is going to blow them out of the water and there is nothing they can do unless they suicide him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. No. It's pretty much what I expected.
He's done what he's supposed to do. They can dispute the usefulness or importance of the indictments, but that's about all I'd expect from most of them.

Some freepers are idiots; the odd pundit may go out on a branch. But so far he's treated the investigation with dignity and hasn't done things he shouldn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. This is a poker game. They don't know what Fitzgerald has on
Edited on Sat Oct-29-05 07:26 PM by rzemanfl
them and are genuinely afraid. They could attack him and end up with the proverbial hot poker up their collective asses. They are also relying heavily on their designated fall guy, Scooter, and are not entirely sure he can be trusted to take one for the team.

I am reminded of an old ethic joke. A platoon of the (insert country you want to insult here) Army is assigned to take out a German foxhole. They approach their target stealthily and then begin running back yelling "It's a trap, there's two of them!"

Like the hapless pick your country soldiers the BFEE doesn't know what's in store for them. I think it is clear that Bush, Rove and Cheney were in on this from the get go. They are relying solely on loyalty and lies to save their asses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
26. Yes, they are definitely "off their game", aren't they?
I think they only have one game, though: attack. When that fails, they flounder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
10. Bush will say he selected Fitz to clean house and he thanks him for a job
well-done thereby washing his hands clean just like Pontius Pilate.

Bush is to petty and vindictive to accept the blame for anything.

Unlike Truman, Bush's motto is "The Buck Stops There".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
14. My read is that the charges against Libby are a lock.
Edited on Sat Oct-29-05 07:35 PM by Zen Democrat
The reporters are connected and they turned. They didn't keep the secrets that Bush assumed they would. Remember early on when he said that he didn't think the leaker would ever be identified? He said to the reporters "you guys are good at keeping secrets."

Their story fell apart and they are all culpable at this point. I think Fitzgerald is right, the bulk of the work is done. Now he's just got to get a couple more under oath ... Bush and Cheney. He couldn't get their agreement to testify without an indictment under his belt to use as extreme pressure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. All the more reason for them to attack him, right?
Or am I missing something? Obviously, it would be unwise to do so, but when have they ever been wise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
15. Same reason Mayor Daley in Chicago doesn't.
Anyone who puts himself out there in trying to smear Fitzgerald will find themselves under the same microscope Bush, Cheney, and Rove are all under.

Those in glass houses better not throw stones. Fitz will smash their glass houses to bits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
21. I don't think there is anything bad to say. Bush* praised him earlier.
They're kinda screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
24. Because the NeoCons understand who's backing Fitzgerald....
...they also realize that Fitz's backers are already pissed off, and growing in numbers on a daily basis.

Additionally, IMHO, Delay did a VERY stupid thing to attack the Judge in public. He doesn't understand that the tide has turned, and he's about to be washed out to sea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
28. Give it time. As David Gergen says...it's coming.
Gergen knows. He's a republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mbee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
29. They don't know if additional indictments are forthcoming so I do
believe it is in their best interest to keep quiet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
30. Bush has already praised him
Tucker Carlson talked about this on some show. I can't remember if it was Maher or something else, but he was saying how Bush shouldn't have praised him so they can smear him. I was so disgusted by that. Ugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 05:30 AM
Response to Original message
34. It's harder when it's not an actual election, is my guess.
Fitzgerald's job is not up to the voters; therefore a media blitz to smear him isn't really going to do so much to hurt him. Not that they won't try--they've already sent some volleys in his direction--but it seems to me that that's more about protecting the unindicted R's jobs (and the pundits who enable them) than about any hope of throwing off Fitzgerald, per se. then again, who the hell knows.

As for Delay, I think it's partly the same thing--he's trying to make sure his base doesn't abandon him in the event that this gets dragged on past '06, and/or he gets off but is tarnished by the accusations. I also think that he's being stupid in this case, as it appears to be backfiring if anything (his popularity is way way down in the polls, and I can't think his whining/blustering all over the airwaves is helping him in that regard), but he just can't help himself. some people are like sharks: they have to attack or they die...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. Good points
Delay is really, really brazen. It's almost like he knows the fix is in or something. Either that, or he's just desperate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC