Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm not a lawyer, but when reading the counts listed in the indictments

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:33 PM
Original message
I'm not a lawyer, but when reading the counts listed in the indictments
Edited on Sat Oct-29-05 07:42 PM by stop the bleeding
I can not but help think that Fitz pretty much has open and shut case on Libby. There does not seem to be much grey area for debating.

So does Libby fight the counts. Which if he does looks like Fitz has him by the balls and he'll lose and get the maximum sentence, and who knows what other details would come out in the trial that Scooter or other WH officials would want to remain secret.

Pleads guilty to one of the counts and agrees to squeal and in return will serve a Martha Stewart sentence

or does he end up eating the bullet and serving a possible 20-30 years.

None of these seems like good news to me if I was Dick Cheney.

Is there something I am missing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Takes the rap, goes to prison & awaits his Presidential pardon.
The pardon could come at any time after Nov 2006.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. He can be pardoned? We are absolutely sure of this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. pardon power is absolute
for federal crimes. i'll be shocked if he doesn't get one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Pardon is absolute, and so is impeachment
Pardons prior to prosecution of these crimes should be followed by swift impeachment. If it doesn't that means that the WH is willing to use the pardon to escape its own criminal activity and the country is not willing to in turn hold a lawless WH accountable. In other words, our republic will cease to be one of laws, but one of anything goes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. it ceased long ago, as far as i can tell
as cover-ups get harder to pull off, pardons get easier to get. warren commissions don't grow on trees, ya know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Why couldn't he?
If Poppy could pardon Cap Weinberger even before a trial, why can't Junior spring Scooter? In fact, he could apparently pardon him preemptively, but I assumed he wouldn't do so before 2006 because that might prompt a political bloodbath in the midterm elections and subject him to increased risk of impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why does everyone at DU confuse lose and loose? This is the
third time in a week I've noticed this.

My guess is that Libby's lawyer already has a pardon signed by Bush in his safe deposit box.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Sorry - corrected. I type really fast and try to rely on the spell checker
but this time I am busted, please don't think I am a MORAN.:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. When I do it I blame keyboard stutter. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Re: Loose v. lose...
This is a common deliberate misspelling around here, like "moran," the infamous Paul Pot, hugh, etc., all of which were gleaned from the dyslexic trolls of Misspellheim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rzemanfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. That would be nice, but all three people I called out on this
Edited on Sat Oct-29-05 08:19 PM by rzemanfl
blamed typing errors, otherwise I would be making a hugh mistake. Pot Paul was my dealer in college, it was Paul's pot I smoked, subtle, but easily understood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. His case against Libby is very strong
I'd be shocked if Libby thought he could take this to court and get an acquittal. It's very close to obvious that Libby's statements to the federal investigators and to the grand jury were lies. Moreover, to successfully challenge the case in court, Libby would essentially have to call Ari Fleischer a liar, and Undersecretary at State (presumably Bolton) a liar, two CIA officials liars, and the Vice President a liar. The "I didn't remember" defense looks weak as hell, given the multitude of contacts and the three reporter witnesses. Libby's other defense would be that the grand jury miscontrued his discussions with Cooper and Miller as he described them, but he'd still be the one acusing numerous others of lies - at least seven people (and perhaps more) would have to be lying for Scooter to have been telling the truth.

He's fucked. Presumption of innocence, to be sure, but this is pretty strong as perjury cases go, and everybody knows it (including Scooter, and his current and future crimional defense attorneys). He will plead, but that leads to other problems. If he does plea, he will have to specifiy his reasons for lying to the court. He can, of course, make these up, but at this point he has to be wondering if future lies will also be discovered and charged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Someone was describing the criminal defense lawyers that Libby
Edited on Sat Oct-29-05 09:05 PM by hang a left
has retained, yesterday on MSNBC, as specializing in deal making. My gut feeling is still that he will plead guilty. Now that sense does not factor in events that transpire up to his trial date. ie Someone else gives up Cheney, then he just might be willing to hand Fitz * to retaliate. I want Rice and Rumsfeld too.



edit comma
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. The only other possibility is that bush will fall on his sword and
pardon Libby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meisje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-29-05 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
13. O.J.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC