Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WAPO : Burglary, Forgery, Delivery :

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
tocqueville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 05:22 AM
Original message
WAPO : Burglary, Forgery, Delivery :
The chain of events that led to Friday's indictment can be traced as far back as 1991, when an unremarkable burglary took place at the embassy of Niger in Rome. All that turned up missing was a quantity of official letterhead with "Republique du Niger" at its top.

More than 10 years later, according to a retired high-ranking U.S. intelligence official, a businessman named Rocco Martino approached the CIA station chief in Rome. An occasional informant for U.S., British, French and Italian intelligence services, Martino brought documents on Niger government letterhead describing secret plans for the sale of uranium to Iraq.

The station chief "saw they were fakes and threw out," the former CIA official said. But Italy shared a similar report with the Americans in October 2001, he said, and the CIA gave it circulation because it did not know the Italians relied on the same source.

On Feb. 12, 2002, Cheney received an expanded version of the unconfirmed Italian report. It said Iraq's then-ambassador to the Vatican had led a mission to Niger in 1999 and sealed a deal for the purchase of 500 tons of uranium in July 2000. Cheney asked for more information.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/29/AR2005102901478.html?sub=AR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 05:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. It started with a two-bit burglary, did it? Shades of Nixon
Hekate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. The CIA station chief, with one glance, could tell they were fakes.
Yet when this already discredited document somehow :eyes: got reintroduced as solid evidence to the Vice President, it became the cornerstone of the bush march to war.
How anyone cannot say that intelligence was cherry-picked to support the bushista's thirst for war is beyond me. Only people without a trace of critical thinking skills (freeps and other neo-con-men) could believe the bushies were totally above board on this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamesinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 06:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. And in '91 we were just getting done with a war in Iraq
Bush I was in office and he was trying to piss of the Middle East in his own way. He lost the election to Clinton so they kept this stuff on ice for 8 years. Bush II comes along and they bring out the unfinished work of '91. BushII has stated that he would not waste the political capital that his dad had at the time, he would have finished Hussein.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bernardo de La Paz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. Ultimately shows how ideologues even bigger suckers than their followers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC