Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Novak "It was NO partisan gunslinger..." LYING SACK OF SH*T

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 12:29 PM
Original message
Novak "It was NO partisan gunslinger..." LYING SACK OF SH*T
Novak is now a proven LIER per the revelation of Official A (Rove) being the source of his outing article of Valerie Plame.

Novak's comment that his source was "no partisan gunslinger" was a blatant attempt to throw the public (and maybe investigators) off of Rove's track and his complicity in this wide-ranging conspiracy of TREASON.

I hope Novak rots in a hell where he is forced to continuously give alms to the poor and perform alturistic acts for liberal causes...and each time he resists, he is jabbed up the ass with a hot poker.

B
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. so who does he work for now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe CNN could run ...
... that little fluff piece they produced about Novak's spiritual journey to becoming a Catholic. I know all about the conversion process to become a Catholic -- it's always amazed me that Novak was able to successfully get through that process without ever having learned ANYTHING about the teachings of Jesus Christ. He was probably on the 'accelerated' course, where a substantial financial donation makes even LYING SCUM acceptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Hmm...isn't lying (bearing false witness) a venal sin??
How many hail marys will Novak have to perform for being complicit in an act of TREASON??

B
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. And for your penance ...
... say three trillion Hail Marys, fourteen million Our Fathers, make seven hundred and fifty thousand novenas, and do the Stations of the Cross at least twice a day for the rest of your life ... OR make a generous donation to your local parish, and all will be forgiven!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Novak took the Opus Dei track -- self-flagellation
But Novak substituted masturbation for flagellation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hot poker...
I'd settle for a cattle prod.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. his day will come--karma and/or judgment day is upon you Nofacts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yep. Both Libby & Rove somehow negotiated "new identies"as sources
as they told reporters this information. Libby was an old capital hill staffer.

Does that not show "conscious intent"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. In my book, concocting a media cover is prima facie evidence...
Both Rove and Libby KNEW what they were doing was TREASON, that's why they worked so hard to cover their identities and then concocted a story that "reporters told them." They were counting on reporters' code of not revealing their sources to cover their tracks.

B
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. So i take it Novak only described one of his sources as non partisan.
Edited on Sun Oct-30-05 09:35 PM by applegrove
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. In reference to "who told him Plame's name," he said "no partisan gunsling
It is clear that Novak heard about Plame for the first time from Rove, who as we know is the O.K. Corral of partisan gunslingers. Novak lied, pure and simple.

B
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. Didn't we already know Rove was a second, "confirming" source?
I believe that's been out for discussion for some time.

We still don't know who was Novak's first original source. The "no partisan gunslinger" refers to Novak's original source, not the second source (Karl) who even Novak knows doesn't fit that description by any standard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Okay - if that is what Novak said - if he left it open for the second one
then that is not proof.

Dam!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC