Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cheney-Staffer-Turned-Reporter Now Covering Libby Indictment for NBC

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 01:52 PM
Original message
Cheney-Staffer-Turned-Reporter Now Covering Libby Indictment for NBC
http://www.workingforchange.com/blog/index.cfm?mode=entry&entry=42CA4708-D0AB-EDCC-7A5F370C730B573A

Cheney-Staffer-Turned-Reporter Now Covering Libby Indictment for NBC
News by David Sirota

Over at the Huffington Post, Dan Carol asks a great question: how can
NBC's Pete Williams be allowed to cover the Scooter Libby story for
the network, considering Williams was a longtime former staffer for
Dick Cheney?

That's right – according to Williams' biography on NBC's website,
Williams is "a native of Casper, Wyoming" – where Cheney is from. In
1986, Williams "joined the Washington, DC staff of then Congressman
Dick Cheney as press secretary and a legislative assistant. In 1989,
when Cheney was named Assistant Secretary of Defense, Williams was
appointed Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs."

Now Williams is being allowed to report on the indictment of Cheney's
chief of staff for NBC News, as if he was just a regular old
nonpartisan objective journalist. And, as Carol points out, Williams
seems to be using his position on TV in some pretty questionable ways
when it comes to the case.

Sources: Dan Carol's post:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dan-carol/reassign-nbcs-pete-willi_b_9814.html

Pete Williams' NBC biography: http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3689493/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Free press in the US? Hardly. WIliams is another shill and he
made sure to sound the part on Russert's CNBC program last night. These guys are the epitome of oily snakeoil salesmen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. All of them act like they work for Cheney


After looking at the Sunday news shows, it looked like a Party for Scooter and an Indictment for Wilson.


Rove must have really scared them again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. Interest (of any kind) is NEVER seen as a 'conflict' in today's media.
The media doesn't even attempt the charade of objectivity. They're only interested in pandering and pimping - it's all about the money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. And that carries over to Washington Journal and C-Span's
non-stop coverage of events and experts of all AEI, Heritage Foundation, and other right wing organization and think tank the right wing puts out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. The media BUSINESS reduces cost and increases net revenue ...
... by using the whole stable of highly-compensated P/R flacks whose appearances on every 'infortainment' program are encouraged. The media get 'free' spewage -- easy to schedule, always available people to fill the time between commercials. For CSPAN, it reduces the cost for production staff - they can use unpaid interns with a small Rolodex of right-wing propaganda outfits that can provide a talking head at any time.

The left wing has absolutely no equivalent operation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think it goes deeper than that. How can we expect Russert to
be able to be objective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. He can't be. But he better be careful because I don't think...
...Fitzgerald would hesitate to lock his ass up if he breaks the law.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. And I don't think anyone but Judy would deserve it more. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. thanks for pointing this out
Williams' bias was evident in Saturday's "Tim Russert" show on NBC. David Gregory, Mrs. Greenspan, Williams, and G.E. Russert. Quite a panel. Russert is a bit muted because of his assigned role in the leak case. But Williams came through for Cheney when it counted, cleverly insinuating that Joe Wilson was a partisan and actually accusing Wilson of lying about the yellowcake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Same lie Snow told on Maher.
No one asks them what lie he told. 9-11 commision did not say Wilson lied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. They've already begun
getting their next Armstrong Williams.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. Another destined to burn in hell.
It's gonna be a happening place before long. Hell, that is :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. another mediawhore working for the Neocons... shocking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. Wow. What a surprise. Not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countingbluecars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. Williams was already spouting talking
points at Fitzgerald's conference on Friday. He asked if it would be difficult to proceed at trial with memories of what happened long ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
32. And pointedly asked "the word of three reporters over...
our Vice Prez's Chief of Staff's word?" He made sure that the right wing scored that vital talking-point, into the minds of everyone listening to the press conference on Friday. I was surprised that he didn't qualify that by using their favorite old term "liberal media" reporters!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
14. while we are on the subject of media...please allow me to plug IWT
Independent World Television is building the world’s first global independent news network. Online and on TV, IWTnews will deliver independent news and real debate from professional and citizen journalists -– without funding from governments, corporations or commercial advertising.


http://www.iwtnews.com/


http://www.iwtnews.com/

SPREAD THE WORD!!

http://www.iwtnews.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
16. Not just a regular whore. An incestuous whore. And that goes for whomever
hired him as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
17. From the Huffington Post: Reassign NBC's Pete Williams

Reassign NBC's Pete Williams


11:53am today Dan Carol

Ok, so it's weird enough to see Tim Russert acting as prosecutor and witness-in-waiting in the CIA Leak case, but I think it's time to ask former Bush 41 DOD chief press flack Pete Williams to take a bow out from actively covering the story which involves his old boss Dick Cheney and former DOD colleague Scooter Libby. It is past absurd isn't it -- to see him grilling Patrick Fitgerald on Friday wondering...

Link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/theblog/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
18. the never-ending story of the Bush administration cesspool ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoodleyAppendage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
19. Well, that explains why he was a complete Cheney whore last night on CNBC
Must be nice having a cheerleader in on the inside when one's in trouble...the duplicity and tentacles of the BFEE never cease to amaze me.

B
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
20. Just like Carl Cameron and FOX
He was allowed to work as a reporter assigned to the Kerry campaign while his wife worked for bush's campaign.

You expect this kind of nonsense from Faux. It is disappointing to see that NBC does it as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
22. Anti-gay party with all these Stonewall-HS '69 era guys.
Rove and Libby both unmarried. Pete Williams was out/outed a few years back. Rush with his muliple-marriages after being outed as Jeff Christie. Condi all alone. Drudge. I'm sure there's more. It's like they have a bed-post underground. Gannon.

Are all these guys High School grads just as Stonewall happens? Or, right there at that time.

(Stonewall, as I understand it, was a bar in NY where gay men met, and when raided by police one time too many revolted and won respect. In about '69. Pardon me if I've stated this wrongly, I just hope I'm close.)

Maybe it's not the gays these CONS hate, they hate marriage, for themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gildor Inglorion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. What? "It's like they have a bed-post underground."
Being unmarried does not mean one hates marriage. I wouldn't dream of defending any of these maggots, but being gay does not INTENSIFY the evil that is present within them. I hope and pray NONE of them are gay, but if they are, they're evil DESPITE being gay, not because of it. I hope, too, that I misunderstood your meaning completely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. I agree, but being hypocritical might intensify evil.
For the record, I said nothing against gays, nor anything that deserves your summary of my post. The subject of the last sentence was CONs for Conservatives. CONs hate. CONs hate gays. Not all CONs hate, but the party they support shows hatred in my view. The CONs I listed were suggested, by me, to hate marriage. In no way, at no time did I indicate that their situation or implied attitude should in any manner be representative of unmarried people either in part or in general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catfight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. Rove is married. The other's I'm not sure about but I've always
contested Condi is a lesbian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. It's that turdblossom in WH with a pee-for-pay Gannon..
That makes me question it. Rove has a powerful chip on his shoulder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Palladin Donating Member (174 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. Williams' tendencies - and Rove's
Edited on Sun Oct-30-05 06:32 PM by Palladin
Interesting. It is a fact that Richard Cheney and Lynn (nee' Vincent) Cheney graduated from Natrona County High School, Casper, Wyoming, in 1959. Cheney got a leg up to go to Yale from Tom Stroock, a Yale alumnus and oil landman who had moved into Casper in the 50's, with the intention of establishing himself as a Republican kingmaker and the eventual goal of getting elected to Wyoming office himself. Stroock was always seen as an EastCoast carpetbagger, and never succeeded in getting elected to anything in Wyoming, but he did eventually get appointed Ambassador to Guatemala in the 80's. Cheney dropped out of Yale after one year, but while he was there he met many prominent influential EastCoast Republican pols through Stroock's introductions. He came back to Casper, where Stroock helped him to get into Wyoming Republican politics.

Pete Williams graduated from Natrona County High School in 1970. He was a forensics and debating whiz. Influential politicians, whether it was Stroock or not I don't know, helped him to get into Stanford. It might even have been the local Democratic bigwigs. He came back to work as news director for KTWO, the (only) local TV station, from 1974 to 1985. Casper is a bleak, even dangerous, place for homosexuals. By the mid-eighties, Cheney was well established as Wyoming's sole Congressman. It was an easy connection for the two NCHS grads, and Williams was probably glad to get out of Casper to more hospitable Washington, D.C.

Eventually Pete Williams became the voice of Gulf War I, as press secretary to Defense Secretary Cheney in that conflict. With Bush I's defeat in 1992, Williams moved on to become a regular newsman, taking some time off after being outed. Cheney went on to roost at the American Enterprise Institute, and through that connection, Halliburton. He never was an oilman himself, nor did he know anything about oilfield equipment and drilling, which are Halliburton's lines of business.

Since all these facts are well known, it's doubtful that Williams can do much good for Cheney in his present role as a talking head. There are going to be many other reporters who will be taking Cheney apart, and Pete Williams can't do much about that. He can only stir up memories of the past, and the past glories of these two are that, definitely past. Nowhere to go but downhill, right to Hades.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #29
40. Oh, Pete can do good for Cheney.
The CONs alter perception by getting their memes out early. Pete could be helpful for inciting the right perceptions as are Rush, Hannity, anyone at Fox, et. al.

Thanks for the info on Pete and Dick. Makes Dick sound worse than I first thought. Pete seemed a decent guy for a while. He impressed me as smart enough. He doesn't seem to fit the CON overlord routine.

I understand Rove left college early. Cheney too!? Interesting.

They're in hades, and the heat's just starting to climb.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #22
38. Rove's on his second wife (she looks like his twin sister) & has kids.
Libby's married with kids. Just a couple factoids since you said they aren't married. They are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Somewhere, I gathered bad information.
I just hope those factoids weren't special gifts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
23. Darn 'liberal' media (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happydreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
24. This goes into the Censorship file w Gannon, the other Williams, et.al
Excellent topic. recommended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
27. The Office of Strategic Influence...strikes again............
Edited on Sun Oct-30-05 05:51 PM by Hubert Flottz
The Office of Strategic Influence, or OSI, was a department set up in the United States Department of Defense in late 2001 or early 2002, to support the War on Terrorism through psychological operations in targeted countries. The closure of the office was announced by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld soon after its existence became publicly known.

The OSI would have been a center for the creation of propaganda materials, for the stated purpose of misleading enemy forces or their civilian populations. After information on the office spread through US and foreign media in mid February 2002, intense discussions on purpose and scope of the office were reported. The discussions culminated in a public statement by Rumsfeld in late February that the office has been closed down.

Some argue that due to its nature and stated purpose, the (non-)existence of such an agency would be hard to determine. In fact, in November 2002, Rumsfeld stated in an interview that only the name of the office was abolished, that it further exists and that it fulfills its original purpose. MORE...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_Strategic_Influence

Edit: to add link below.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x5224341



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neil Lisst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
31. And Pete Williams has been pushing "nothing else is coming"
He has been a talking point for Cheney and Bush the past 3 days. EVERY time I've seen him, he's selling it hard that this is over, that this is only about the narrow issues defined, and that none of this touches Cheney.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
33. Don't they all work for this administration? N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Bingo, They are work for BushCo anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
35. Thanks for posting this. I have forwarded all the above info to all
on my email list...hopefully they will forward it...and so on and so on and so on. In this way we can try to get the truth out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
36. Call NBC and demand full disclosure!!
NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ginnyinWI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
37. Well I saw him on CNBC's Tim Russert hour long program
He was discussing the CIA Leak case with Russert, David Gregory, and Andrea Mitchell. I didn't see anything wrong with what he said. :shrug: It seemed like they were all on the same page, and that page was not sympathetic to the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. I caught his bias IMMEDIATELY three days ago.
Edited on Mon Oct-31-05 08:07 PM by Carolab
Right before and right after the indictment he was trying to spin it as no big thing that Cheney and Libby were discussing this and trying to say it would essentially lead nowhere. I said to my boyfriend: "who is THIS shill?" He couldn't be MORE obvious.

He should be taken off this beat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC