Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge assigned to Libby case has links to Republican Right.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
DrBlix Donating Member (148 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 10:19 PM
Original message
Judge assigned to Libby case has links to Republican Right.
October 30, 2005 -- Judge assigned to Libby case has links to Republican Right.
.
US District Judge for DC Reggie Walton has been assigned the Lewis Libby case.
.
It is noteworthy to point out Walton's past and current links to the Republican Right and to elements in the Bush administration who have covered up important details about 911.
.
Walton was appointed to the DC Superior Court in 1981 by Ronald Reagan.
.
In 1989, he was appointed by George H. W. Bush as the deputy drug czar under Bill Bennett.
.
Walton was reappointed to the DC Superior Court by the senior Bush.
.
George W. Bush nominated Walton to the US District Court for DC in 2001.
.
Walton was the judge who, under pressure from the Justice Department, placed a gag order on former FBI translator and whistleblower __Sibel Edmonds and cleared his courtroom of the public and media in Edmonds' hearing in her case against the FBI. Edmonds brought to light important information about how the FBI failed to translate important wiretap intercepts before and after 911.
.
http://www.waynemadsenreport.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. On AAR, they were saying that he's "not a defendant's judge," however. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KaryninMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Guess we should have expected this. Now what?
Is there any recourse when a judge is clearly determined to be partisan? Obviously there are some who are partisan but most are not as outwardly partisan as this one appears to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm not worried about it. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtowngman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is a shocker, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. No.
Look at what happened in all of the Schiavo cases...People assumed that political partisanship would trump justice.

It did not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NanceGreggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well, there goes Tom DeLay's judge-shopping trip.
What's sauce for the goose ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Sounds like an anti-leaker judge to me.
Seems he takes exposure of secrets very seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. HFS!!!!!!! He's the one that put the gag order on Sibel Edmonds?!?!?
Fvck me to tears!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. Wayne Madsen...I don't know about this guy.
Seems that he publishes unsubstantiated stuff, pretty regularly. And, while this judge's connections may be fact, I've tended to take what Madsen has to say on any given subject with a grain of salt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skids Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I think of him as Michael Moore, but packing a gun.

Salt required. But no more than a couple of grains.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yeah if DeLay whines about having a democratic judge
it means it's all about politics, right? The right-wingers have politicized our court system and paralyzed it. They, in essence, have destroyed our judicial system through their partisanship. They have undermined the Constitution of which they proclaim to protect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cantstandbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
12. Isn't he the judge who dismissed Sibel Edmonds suit? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 12:22 AM
Response to Original message
13. Let me get this straight...
The judge sided with the government.

Fitzgerald represents the government and is a strictly by the book guy who goes for the sure thing.

Why are we supposed to be worried?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrBlix Donating Member (148 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 12:44 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Recusal of judge
Judge Reggie Walton assigned to Libby case: Recusal of judge appointed to the bench by two Bush ptresidents should have been sought by prosecutor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. He may have to recuse himself if * is implicated.
Which I fully expect to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
16. Libby will appeal to the SC, and they will overturn any conviction?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC