Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NO CRIME (spin) NO CRIME (spin) NO CRIME (spin)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 11:15 PM
Original message
NO CRIME (spin) NO CRIME (spin) NO CRIME (spin)
For CRYING OUT LOUD, every Sunday talk show I turned on, no matter WHERE IN THE PROGRAM, had some SPINSTER trying to spin this thing for the WHITE HOUSE!

I couldn't watch a single one more than 2 minutes before becoming so DISGUSTED with the completely BLATANT attempts to brush this off as a NON-CRIME!

Many talk show guests were saying, "Libby should not be charged because the original crime was not found to have happened."

I KEPT SCREAMING AT MY T.V.: "JUST BECAUSE FITZGERALD DIDN'T CHARGE ANYONE WITH THE LEAK DOESN'T MEAN THE CRIME WASN'T COMMITTED! WHAT A BUNCH OF #%$#@ ASSHOLES!"

I am completely frustrated and I hope the average person sees this CRAP for what it is!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Like a damn DJ in the 1980's they spin so much. n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is a blowjob a crime?
What do they say about the fact that some of them voted against Clinton? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
15. In some states...probably...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. They are given their talking points, and their job is to repeat them.
And yes, I think people will see beyond it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ayup...and no one's calling them on it despite Fitz's own statement >>>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Perjury is an underlying crime as is obstruction of justice
and lying to a federal agent. Cisneros' ex-mistress was prosecuted for lying on a loan application I believe (could be wrong, but that is my understanding).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Not even UNDERLYING--perjury and obstruction are CRIMES
CRIMES. In and of themselves, CRIMES. Plain and simple, CRIMES. No factors in mitigation need apply.

You do not lie to the Feds. You do not lie to a Grand Jury.

Trying to spin this shit out like it ain't really important is horseshit. And ya know what? It ain't working, either.

They outed a covert agent. They compromised national security. They committed a CRIME.

There's no way to minimize it. They can try, but it does not cut it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Yeah... and thank GOD...
No one got a blow job!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. I personally like the theory
that Irving L. "Loose Scooter" Libbey was lying to the grand jury about his involvement in order to protect himself from no crime at all, and that, most importantly, absolutely nobody else in the administration was involved. "Loose Scooter" Libbey put himself in jeopardy for 30 years in the slammer over nothing and nobody. Got it. Good theory.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Child_Of_Isis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. That was a good one!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. It would be funny if ROVE was indicted on Tuesday!
my oh my they would have egg on their faces. Besies someone sai there were more sealed indictments at least another 2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-30-05 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. Anyone who doesn't know, I just tell them
"Well, before someone leaked the identity of a CIA operative, we had a national security asset which tracked which countries were buying WsMD equipment. After her cover was blown, we lost that asset. You are not safer now. But I say we let the guy who did it go free, don't you agree?"

Most people's minds freeze.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
12. what about Martha Stewart?
Are Republicans apologizing for their attacks on her and Bill Clinton?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. The Hypocrisy is UNBELIEVABLE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 08:02 AM
Response to Original message
14. They're playing the tempest in the teapot card
They say; Joseph Wilson lied about Niger, Valerie was a secretary and Rove is still there with the pretzeldunce out of the loop.
I sure hope that Rover gets his due and all these spinmeisters get put out. They can not be that ignorant or can they?

Libby lied to the Grand Jury and should have known better. This means he was shielding something.
The Truth Is Not In Them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
16. I think it's a good thing.
I've watched a number of the same shows, and I think it is a giggle that they are taking a weak stance. It might help to use the campaign model, where there are three groups: 1- those who agree with you; 2- those who disagree with you; and 3- the undecided. The talk shows are not likely to change the opinions of anyone on DU, or from the White House fan club. So let's think in terms of "mainstream America." Pretend they are a jury of sorts .... the jury of public opinion. Who are they going to be more impressed with: Patrick Fitzgerald or Sean Hannity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC