Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I think all this "they need new blood at the WH" talk is to ease Rove out

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 12:38 AM
Original message
I think all this "they need new blood at the WH" talk is to ease Rove out
http://www.swissinfo.org/sen/swissinfo.html?siteSect=143&sid=6176351&cKey=1130710832000

Calls for White House shakeup focus on Karl Rove

By Randall Mikkelsen

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President George W. Bush, whose top adviser Karl Rove remains in jeopardy in a CIA-leak probe, needs to shake up his White House staff if he hopes to revive a presidency reeling from multiple setbacks, Republican and Democratic lawmakers said on Sunday.

The lawmakers also urged Bush to investigate the office of Vice President Dick Cheney, whose chief of staff, Lewis Libby, resigned on Friday and was indicted on perjury and other charges in connection with the probe. snip

"I think Karl Rove should step down," Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid of Nevada said on ABC's "This Week."

Mississippi Republican Sen. Trent Lott said the Bush administration needed "new blood, new energy, qualified staff," and that he expected the president to address his problems.

"I'm not talking about wholesale changes, but you've got to reach out and bring in more advice and counsel," Lott said on "Fox News Sunday."

Rove remains under investigation in the probe into who leaked the identity of covert CIA operative Valerie Plame, whose diplomat husband is a prominent Iraq war critic. The White House's credibility has been hurt by disclosures that Rove and Libby leaked Plame's identity, despite earlier official denials attributed to the two men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. Is 10,000 quarts of blood enough??
Adults have approx 5 quarts x 2000 killed = 10,000 quarts:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fearnobush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. So Rove could resign claiming family issues a week or two before
he is quietly indicted?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Exactly.
They know he is going to be charged. They want it to look like * made him go BEFORE he was indicted. They think they are so fucking smart. They are so transparent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. That may have been the best deal he could come up with?
Edited on Mon Oct-31-05 12:47 AM by NNN0LHI
Bush could have asked for the delay for national security reasons or to finish up some important government business and Fitzgerald would have probably granted it.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 12:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. Will the puppet cry when the string is cut?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. There doesn't have to be any REAL termination--
Rove can be eased into some foundation job, but continue more or less the same duties, though at a somewhat greater distance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Unless he ends up living in a penitentiary n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatchWhatISay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
8. What I don't get is why all the Republicans want to start with Andrew Card
Everytime one of them starts talking about "new blood", his is the first name they raise. It seems like a talking point from above to me. What has Card done? Nobobdy ever asks them why not Cheney/Rove/etc., why is it that Andrew Card should go?

I'm not defending him. Just wondering what he's done to offend them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 01:02 AM
Response to Original message
9. I think it's to avoid impeachment...
The RW knows it could very well happen since they set the bar so low. If they get rid of a bunch of people at the WH, they want people to think they got rid of the troublemakers. :eyes:

Then bush can say, 'we're starting over from scratch'. He knows how much trouble they are in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
10. In that case, * needed new blood in Jan, 2000.
Leading from failure to failure (my use of the word leading here is very loose.) the neocons have accomplished nothing. They've tortured people in our name, and continue to do so. They've eroded our Constitutional rights, especially those in the Bill of Rights, in the name of "patriotism". They've waged war with no provocation and lied to the world, the public, and the Congress to achieve it. They've wasted vast sums of money on a privatisation mess that may take generations to unravel. They've adopted irresponsible positions on education, environment, science, and other academic areas which will haunt our country for years to come.

They have accomplished nothing.

The time for new blood in the White House was January, 2000. The new blood should have been the Albert Gore administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 01:31 AM
Response to Original message
11. They're trying to get rid of him for sure
Edited on Mon Oct-31-05 01:31 AM by FreedomAngel82
He's causing them bad press and Bush's poll raitings lower. I wonder how he feels about that eh? Would Bush sacrifice Rove and have him step down publically? Remember when he said he would fire him if anyone was caught involved? For whatever reason he isn't doing that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC