smoogatz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-31-05 08:34 AM
Original message |
I realize that speculation is much of what we do here, but-- |
|
Edited on Mon Oct-31-05 08:35 AM by smoogatz
trying to guess where--if anywhere--Fitz's investigation will lead next is obviously futile. Fitz works in mysterious ways. We should all, as he says, take a deep breath and relax a bit. The Libby indictment is a victory--any additional indictments, should they come, would be gravy, IMO.
|
lse7581011
(948 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-31-05 08:34 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Friday was such an anticpated event, I feel the need to regroup!
|
whatever4
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-31-05 08:38 AM
Response to Original message |
2. I tend to want to agree with you on that |
|
because anything that truly matters, any juicy details of this event, won't be released by him until it's over. If he can, legally, release the details. We don't have anything to work off of righ now. We're pretty sure what they did, but know little about exactly how they did it. Apparently, the WH pulled a LOT of people into this mess, and made it a tangled mystery, I think intentionally.
Way TOO cool that Fitz likes that sort of stuff, complete with his special love for complicated puzzles. Still makes me giggle. TOO cool.
|
emulatorloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Oct-31-05 09:32 AM
Response to Original message |
3. From the horse's mouth -- Patrick Fitzgerald: |
|
I will not end the investigation until I can look anyone in the eye and tell them that we have carried out our responsibility sufficiently to be sure that we've done what we could to make intelligent decisions about when to end the investigation. We hope to do that as soon as possible. I just hope that people will take a deep breath and just allow us to continue to do what we have to do.http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/28/AR2005102801340.html
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 10th 2024, 07:21 AM
Response to Original message |