DU Lou Dobbs Poll,as well :)

[w8liftinglady]

http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/lou.dobbs.tonight/

Do you believe Friday’s indictments justify the two-year investigation and millions of dollars spent by the special prosecutor?

right now-82% yes :)

[babylonsister]

1. Millions of dollars? I believe he has Fitz confused with Starr. nt

[Chiyo-chichi]

exactly what I was thinking.

Let's write Lou Dobbs. What is the figure that Fitz has spent?

[No Exit]

15. The figure was approx. $750,000. Definitely btw 700 and 800 thousand

[SoCalDemocrat]

24. Email Lou Dobbs and tell him what you think

$750k vs. $50 millon spent on a Clinton witch hunt

They need to spend $50 million on this investigation and leave no stone unturned.

Email Lou Dobbs directly and tell him what you think of his poll.

http://www.cnn.com/feedback/forms/form5.html?9

Why does Dobbs and CCN even question the $750K spent so far? The Clinton investigation ran longer and spent over $50 million dollars. This is poor journalism on the part of CNN.

[No Exit]

27. Well, Dobbs questions it because

he seems to have gotten his facts way wrong, and thinks it's in the millions!:)

It's worth ANY amount of money to ME.

[dae]

7. You're correct, but I still voted "Yes".

[No Exit]

14. Good point. Fitz's investigation has cost approx. $750,000.

Compared to what Ken Starr spent, that's chump change.

[Pam-Moby]

2. Done

Do you believe Friday’s indictments justify the two-year investigation and millions of dollars spent by the special prosecutor?

Yes 82% 6810 votes

No 18% 1532 votes
Total: 8342 votes

[obnoxiousdrunk]

3. The last figure

I heard was $725,000. What Million ???

[MuseRider]

6. That is the figure

I remember as well.

[fooj]

4. I fired him off a short e-mail...

Mr. Dobbs...

Mr. Fitzerald has spent under 850,000 dollars on the investigation. Your poll misrepresents the facts.

Peace.

[goclark]

5. Keep it kicked , still 82%

[QuettaKid]

8. Done...keep kickin'.

:dem: :dem: :dem: :dem:

[jeff30997]

9. Done!

Still 82%

[Canuckistanian]

10. 82-18, not bad

Someone should call him on the "$millions" part, though.

[PatriotMom]

11. kick and done, but I think more should have happened

I will not be happy until we have Bush and Cheney on a spit over a slow fire. These men need to go to JAIL.

[Little Star]

12. If Miss run a-muck

had cooperated, Fitz would have been done long ago. No she fought through all possible lower court appeals,then onto the USSC& a token jail stint. Lustful Lou loves Judas so much hes like a dog in heat. I like him on somethings and others his republican is showing.

[stop the bleeding]

13. Total: 8415 votes - still at 82% -too bad we can't send them a

comment, because even if it was Brazillion dollars it is still worth it to hold up the integrity of our National Security even while fighting the war on terra

[Sick_of_Rethuggery]

17. I did send him a comment too...

I told him it was less than 750k and asked him if he knew Ken Starr spent 70+ Million chasing after a blue dress ;)

[Tesibria]

18. me too! nt

[yellowcanine]

20. Heh. I just sent him a note on same subject. Check it out.

In your question re Fitzgerald and the Libby indictment you talk about "millions of dollars" spent. I think the number was more like $750, 000. Even I know that is less than a million dollars and I don't have a TV investment show. Maybe you were thinking of that other special prosecutor, Ken Starr?

[Supersedeas]

16. 82 still

[ContraBass Black]

19. It's a push poll!

The responses aren't the point.

[Jane Austin]

21. Did you know there was a link on CNN.com to correct errors or indications

of slant on their broadcasts?

Maybe I am the last to know, but I was glad to find it.

The link is on this page:

http://www.cnn.com/feedback/cnntv/

[carolinalady]

22. Not sure millions is a true estimate. n/t

[oregonindy]

23. I thought it was like 783,000 dollars spent.

[Radio_Lady]

25. Poll is still at 82%.

[Metta]

26. done. thanks.

[anitar1]

28. Dobbs is such a sly little piggy with his loaded questions, n/t

[Poiuyt]

29. The question has changed - look at this!

Are you surprised that a special prosecutor, after 667 days of investigation, could not indict anyone for an underlying crime in the White House CIA leak investigation?

[NNN0LHI]

30. Is that normal to change the question a couple of hours before his show?

I really don't know? Does anyone know?

Don