Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNN commentary on the motions filed along with Libby's indictment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Halliburton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 03:47 PM
Original message
CNN commentary on the motions filed along with Libby's indictment
<snip>
KATHLEEN KOCH, CNN CORRESPONDENT: I was just in the courtroom, Wolf, and what happened is a magistrate Judge Deborah Robertson (ph) entered at 12:37, and grand jury members entered, 18 of them, and then the foreperson. The judge asked if they had materials to present to the court. They said yes. The foreperson took that up to the clerk, and then she said, are there are motions? They said, yes. And then she said, the materials will be tendered to the deputy clerk for filing. So there was no reading of what these motions. There was no reading of anyone's name. So now everyone is lined up outside the deputy clerk's office waiting to get that materials.

BLITZER: So we'll get the documents, but what -- talk to us in English, Kathleen, what this might mean.

KOCH: That's what I don't know, Wolf. We're waiting really to find out when this material comes in, whether it will have names. We assume, again, that because there was -- there were materials to be presented to the court, there were motions, that those motions consist of something relatively important.

Hang on, Wolf. I'll put my microphone on.

But we're not really sure at this point what they will include. Again, the special counsel, Patrick Fitzgerald, was there, came into the courtroom, sat at the table, as did the members of the grand jury. They sat, some again, 18 of them.

But, Wolf, we're really not sure what that means, and I've just lost my earpiece. Why don't we go to Bob Franken.

BLITZER: Hold on, bob. We'll get back to you. We'll let both of you hook up.

Joe Digenova was listening to this, Jeff Toobin was listening to this, both excellent lawyers, both former prosecutors.

Joe, first you, what did you understand from that?

DIGENOVA: Well, sometimes -- well, obviously, the indictment is handed up. It's always handed up in a package, and it could be that the motions have something to do with the manner in which the case is going to be assigned. There may have been a discussion with Judge Hogan about that the other day during that 45-minute meeting, if it had something to do with keeping certain things under seal. It's hard to tell at this point.

BLITZER: Jeff Toobin, what about you it?

JEFFREY TOOBIN, CNN SR. LEGAL ANALYST: That's the word that Kathleen used that jumped out at me, motions, because this is actually -- I mean, it's funny to see all this sort of attention what in on an ordinary day in a U.S. attorney's office is totally routine and boring process, which is walking the indictment from the grand jury room over to the magistrate, who's on duty, and literally handing it up. I mean, that's what they call handing it up. You hand it to the judge who is sitting on the bench. They call it handing up, and that's essentially the end of it, and the document become public.

I don't know anything about motions that would be presented there. And maybe Joe could help us, because every office is a little different, and he used to be the boss there. But I'm a little puzzled by the reference to motions.

DIGENOVA: Well, when I was U.S. attorney in that very courthouse, I never presented a single indictment that had a motion attached at the time and handed up to the magistrate. So it could have something to do with classified information, it could have something to do with specially assigning the cases, not putting it on the wheel, where the judges get cases by random, or it could have something to do with keeping it sealed, although that seems unlikely since Patrick Fitzgerald is holding a news conference at 2:00 p.m.

TOOBIN: That certainly doesn't seem -- I mean, that occurred to me. But Patrick Fitzgerald just scheduled a news conference. So I don't see how he could have at the same time claim that an indictment needs to be sealed.
<snip>

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0510/28/bn.02.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow! What a world class news-gathering organization!
Edited on Mon Oct-31-05 03:54 PM by Richardo
Koch: "Something's happening, and I don't know what it is! Back to you, Jeff!"

Toobin: "You're all a bunch of ignorant dweebs. Wolf?"

Blitzer: "Thanks Jeff - that we are." :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wonder if this means there are sealed indictments? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. I was watching that coverage live, and I immediately thought that might
have had something to do with sealed indictments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
because this is new info to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thanks for this! I had missed this on CNN and very much wanted
to find out about it. It seems to me that Toobin and DiGenova, supposedly CNN legal EXPERTS don't know very much if they don't seem to know anything about motions. All one has to do is google it, takes seconds yet these experts who go on about their expert opinion re Fitz being finished his investigation, etc, but don't know about motions.

Typical 'in the beltway' talking heads, all gas, no brains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faithnotgreed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. and considering toobin just said friday afternoon that the case was over
and fitzgerald is only mopping up at this point
and body language
blahblahblah

legal eagles they are
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spindrifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. But the best of all:


"...talk to us in English, Kathleen, what this might mean." Check the paragraph, Wolf. It's not too arcane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. A motion is a formal request of the parties to the court.
(4) Sealed Indictment. The magistrate judge to whom an indictment is returned may direct that the indictment be kept secret until the defendant is in custody or has been released pending trial. The clerk must then seal the indictment, and no person may disclose the indictment's existence except as necessary to issue or execute a warrant or summons.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. K & R! Just logged back on. What is this about a Fitz news conference??
Ambass. Wilson coming up. He was WONDERFUL earlier today on C-Span.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. the commentary is from the other day
not new news:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I'm confused. Why is it being posted now? ....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. thanks, I have a diary at DKOS with the same info
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC