Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Out of curiosity, did any of the naysayers actually see Fitzgerald on TV

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 04:16 PM
Original message
Out of curiosity, did any of the naysayers actually see Fitzgerald on TV
when he did his thing on live television last Friday?

I really can't understand how you'd be pessimistic if you had seen the way he handled that press conference. It's so much different seeing and hearing him than it is just reading the transcript of it. The guy was amazing, and the written transcript just doesn't do him the same justice as watching him live.

I'm just wondering that if you're one of the pessimistic ones (as to the Plame Case) and whether or not you saw the whole thing unfold on TV last Friday. If you didn't see the live coverage, I think you would've felt much better about the whole thing if you had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
vickie Donating Member (663 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. I couldn't agree more. He was stellar. Simply stellar.
It was like watching the hero of a 1940's movie. This son of a doorman (as the press likes to dub him), is going to clean the filth out of the White House. He's not going to do it overnight, but he's going to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. Yes - it was straight. And that is why it is so dangerous and the
freepers have to shoot him down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. I can only think they took a page out of Janet Paschall's book and


didn't remove their fingers until after it was over, lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mucifer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. totally blew the "Plame wasn't a secret agent idea" out of the water
AND he mentioned he won't look into whether this case is about why we went to war. Yet, he said it in such a way as to make us look like we are not a bunch of wingnuts. If someone in the press would get on the ball with this it would be helpful
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. kicking kuz I am kurious n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shugh514 Donating Member (274 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. I watched the whole press conference
Edited on Mon Oct-31-05 05:24 PM by shugh514
The one thing that caused me to be pessimistic is his baseball analogy of the wild pitch. He made it quite clear that even if he could determine who revealed the name, he would also have to determine "criminal intent" in order to indict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. I, for one, was very impressed by his demeanor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. It was so refreshing to see someone embracing the TRUTH again.
I believe in this man and his mission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. I can see the reasons why they are pessimistic
this administration has been like teflon, nothing seems to stick. But they have really cooked that pan with this, and the teflon is old and cracked. This will stick. I did not hear Fitz say that the investigation was over. I heard that the bulk of it is over. Now comes the time to shift through all the facts, and put it all together. This is where the meat is going to be found. It isn't over till Fitz says it's over.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. He said the bulk of the investigation was over which could mean 51%
People don't think about that.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. True that....or it could mean that Libby even with all his stonewalling
did not fool the Fritz-ster...just pissed him off. He now after indicting the liar and obstructionist, can now settle into the case and do his job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
10. Hoping to hear from more of the pessimists. I'm not trying to be uppity
Just wondering if you pessimists (again, not trying to be uppity or condescending) saw Fitzgerald on TV speak for well over an hour. I don't think I could've had the same positive affect, had I not actually seen and heard him. He was marvelous to watch, right from the way he handled the press to all of his personal mannerisms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. Reading some of the
eather curious "concerns" expressed by fellow DUers convinces me that they probably watch far to much tv. TV makes people think Karl Rove is more important than Libby; surely in the Plame case, anyone who is even mildly well-informed knows this simply isn't true. But even more than that, over-exposure to tv makes people passive, with an external locus of control. They see themselves as incapable of taking care of business; set up heroes in their tv-activated imaginations, who can never meet their needs in real life; and are generally the weak link when it comes to democratic actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnsnake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I watch little TV, but I watched last Friday & Fitz DID become my hero
I'm not sure what your point is, H2O Man. I don't think that if a DUer watches too much TV it has a bearing on whether or not he or she sets himself up for hero worship. In the case of Fitzgerald, I am so glad I stayed home that afternoon from work and got to see it. I might not feel as positive about our chances if I hadn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. They want Fitzgerald to slay The Boogeyman
And to them, Rove is The Boogeyman.

Although I suspect Rove will be getting indicted himself before long, it's Libby who is/has been more dangerous, if only w/ his ties to Cheney and the whole Iraq gang. He'll lead to the big fish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
14. Oh Ya dick on the stand under oath its coming folks!!!
I don't think people relaized when Scooter said he heard it from Cheney what that all meant!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
funflower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
15. My ticket for 08 if Fitzgerald/Jet Blue Pilot. Whaddya think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mandyky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-31-05 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
18. I think the disappoinment is only one indictment
But I agree with you, Fitz was awesome in the press conference. Not only that he showed a clear contrast with WH press briefings. Today when I was watching Scotty McClellan with the press and thought back to Fitz - Fitz gave credible reasons why he coouldn't answer questions, while Scotty's excuses were oh so lame...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC