Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How much did Bush want to be a war President?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
libertypirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:56 AM
Original message
How much did Bush want to be a war President?
Enough to lie?

Let's see?
6-30-03
Media Silent on Clark's 9/11 Comments
Gen. says White House pushed Saddam link without evidence
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=1842

The other Clark...

12 September 2001
Bush asked Richard A. Clark "See if Saddam did this"

According to Richard A. Clarke, a former National Security Council Official: "On September 12th, I left the video conferencing center and there, wandering alone around the situation room, was the president. He looked like he wanted something to do. He grabbed a few of us and closed the door to the conference room. "Look," he told us, "I know you have a lot to do and all, but I want you, as soon as you can, to go back over everything, everything. See if Saddam did this. See if he's linked in any way."
Richard A. Clarke, Chapter 1, Against All Enemies: Inside America’s War on Terror (2004).

Oh and Vader Himself
16 September 2001
Do we have any evidence linking ... Iraq to 9-11? No

Vice President Dick Cheney was interviewed by Tim Russert following the terrorist attacks on September 11.
MR. RUSSERT: Do we have any evidence linking Saddam Hussein or Iraqis to this operation?
VICE PRES. CHENEY: No.
Dick Cheney’s interview with Tim Russert. 16 September 2001.
Available at:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/vicepresident/news-speeches/speeches/vp20010916.html

I know there is a couple of more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. At least this much.
He didn't listen to his own intel.

WHY THE CIA THINKS BUSH IS WRONG
The president says the US has to act now against Iraq. The trouble is, his own security services don't agree.
13 October 2002
http://www.sundayherald.com/28384

CIA IN BLOW TO BUSH ATTACK PLANS
The letter also comes at a time when the CIA is competing with the more hawkish Pentagon, which is also supplying the White House with intelligence on the Iraqi threat.
October 10, 2002
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,808970,00.html

WHITE HOUSE 'EXAGGERATING IRAQI THREAT'
Bush's televised address attacked by US intelligence
October 9, 2002
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,807286,00.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Do we have any evidence leading Iraq to 9/11?
The Bush administration says no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. He told his biographer in 1999 that he wanted to invade Iraq
http://www.gnn.tv/articles/article.php?id=761

“He was thinking about invading Iraq in 1999,” said author and journalist Mickey Herskowitz. “It was on his mind. He said to me: ‘One of the keys to being seen as a great leader is to be seen as a commander-in-chief.’ And he said, ‘My father had all this political capital built up when he drove the Iraqis out of Kuwait and he wasted it.’ He said, ‘If I have a chance to invade….if I had that much capital, I’m not going to waste it. I’m going to get everything passed that I want to get passed and I’m going to have a successful presidency.”

more-

Did you get that? "If I have a chance to invade..." He was looking forward to it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. I think Bush was exploited by the PNAC'le Club.
I think they had the agenda to move into Iraq, control the oil, water, and be the strategic pivot to usher in the New American Century. Problem was, most sane people would think this nuts.

But in Bush, they had a neer-do-well, intellectually lazy puppet that could be easily manipulated.

And I'm sure he had something to prove to Poppy. He had the opportunity to show Dad how he could be the War pResident. Look at the baggge....Dad was a WW2 hero, Dimson was AWOL. So he could redeem himself by doing what Dad failed to do: take out Saddam. Ultimately, for Bush, I really think it boils down to a psychlogical issue to one up Pops....nothing else really matter. Cheney, Rummy, et al had the perfect dupe to do their bidding. He'd be the willing idiot to do execute the PNAC plan, 'cuz then he could show Dad what a war pResident he was. Failed spectacularly at this, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
5. He brought it up in the 2000 election
In one of the debates with Gore, he answered on of the questions in a very bloodthirsty way.
"The military is there to fight war!"
And he even mentioned Iraq.
I knew right then that if he got elected we would wind up in a war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ugarte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-08-05 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. Not as bad as he wants to be a 3-war President...nt
Edited on Tue Nov-08-05 01:50 AM by ugarte
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC