SoCalDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-08-05 06:51 PM
Original message |
Ahhnold should have to reimburse the state |
|
for the cost of this stupid election.. There is NOTHING on this "ballot" that rises to the need of emergency must-vote-now status..
He did this because he "could" and he thought it would bolster his chances in 06.. This is a campaign "poll" paid for out of state coffers that are already lacking..
Arnold always says he's a rich man.. let him PAY for this dumb escapade..
Give us our money back Arnold..It;s MY money!!!
|
Sirveri
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-08-05 06:53 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I'll be hapy to vote Ahnold out of office next election. |
|
Good riddance, the posturing dumbass. At least our unions are strong enough and ballsy enough to fight back against him, even if the dems can't put up a decent candidate.
|
MsUnderstood
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-08-05 06:58 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Wish that was on the ballot |
|
Proposition 69--should we screw ahnold after he screwed us?
|
SoCalDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-09-05 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. It SHOULD be on the ballot.. Loser pays..just like in court |
|
Just because you can get a bunch ofsignatures is NO reason to be able to put a bunch of stupid issues on a ballot and force the state to pay for a special election..
Arnold OWES the state of Kelli-forn-ya a bunch of money..
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:17 AM
Response to Original message |