Physics professor entertains "controlled demolition" in all 3

[DemInDistress]

world trade collapses.Great article
Y. professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/1%2C1249%2C635160132%2C00.html

[lvx35]

1. You know I can never quite buy this stuff anymore.

The whole thing smells fishy, but I've seen a lot of 'facts' the 9/11 conspiracy theories are based on turn out to be not true. Things like fires burning as hot as the material they are burning. For instance, paper/wood burn around 451 f, but I later found out just from fire safety tapes at work that common fires in houses reach tempuratures vastly hotter than that, when they are in an enclosed space.

[Wilms]

3. Does the official story add up?

Yes., I've seen plenty of wacky theories about what happened. The 9/11 Commission most notably.

[lvx35]

6. Agreed.

There are a lot of very confirmed bits of fishiness. Nobody doubts the government was lying about some of it. The question is why...were they trying to conceal from a legitimate Al Queda enemy how much they knew? Or something worse.

The thing about these stories is that you catch problems. Like when he stated that all three buildings fell symmetrically...But if you watched it, only one tower fell that way. The other didn't. So this guy has fundamental facts wrong.

(edit: and yes, WTC7 is fishy.)

Can you imagine if the Bush DID plan it, and now his people are being indicted, public opinion is openly against him and he is presiding over the worst deficit in history and failed war? As far as totalitarian control, he'd be the worst dictator EVER. ;)

[texpatriot2004]

2. I think he's on to something. n.t

[aquart]

4. No, he's not.

But being distracted by this type of disinformation denigrates all investigation into what happened.

God, it's such a STUPID theory and it just keeps circulating.

It's also a fucking racist theory because some of us can't admit the brown guys wiped the floor with us. It HAD to be a white guy plot so somewhere in some tiny minds we'd still be in control. Tiny, tiny, tiny minds.

[texpatriot2004]

5. Uh, beg your pardon sir, but in your opinion he's not. Thank you.

[DemInDistress]

8. thanks tex..again you come to my rescue

the article was fascinating and more plausible coming from a professional person.I didn't realize govt had over 6k pics,video's and other facts .I say turn over and make public all materials concerning 911 to independent guys like the professor..

[texpatriot2004]

9. I agree. I like what this Prof. said, he doesn't speculate about

who...rather he just wants an independent, scientific study of the evidence. I think that makes sense.

[DemInDistress]

7. world trade 7 was not bought down by fire alone...

in video, evidence of wiffs squibbs and puffs emanating from the upper
floors is compelling,linear charges will cut steel in 30' sections
larry silverstein admits to "pullimg the building" but how?

[texpatriot2004]

10. I personally don't think fire alone could do it - NO not even with

fuel and the heat being so hot, blah blah blah.

[Caesarmajestic]

12. deleted

deleted

[ROH]

14. The last paragraph reflects...

a very unusual opinion to hold.

[Caesarmajestic]

11. For when you realize you are really a freeper, too . . .

No this is a summary by Deseret News --> Instead go straight to the article by the Brigham Young physics professor.

http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html

-------------------

I always did wonder why the very top floor (#110) of the North Tower collapsed before the one under the plane wreck collapsed. Watch the sequence of the floor collapses.

I always did wonder why the South Tower started to fall like a tree, then instead of following the path of least resistance, it changed and for some reason chose to follow the path of most resistance, which was straight down into it's own core. We all saw it.

It fell like a tree for several seconds, so unless you can tell me what force it was that can stop 1/3 of a 500,000 ton skyscraper from tilting once it has tilted nearly 20 degrees, then you must admit a violation of Newton's First Law of Inertia. Or go off into Alice and Wonderland with the freepers.

If you do not know about World Trade Center 7, then see if this makes any big-brother alarms go off in your head: It was a 570 foot tall building that fell down in the middle of New York City on September 11, 2001. Meanwhile, most people think only the two big buildings fell.

FEMA, NIST, and the 911 Commission all said that WTC7 fell due to fire. You may feel differently about tin foil hats after you have viewed the video of the buildings collapse yourself. I highly suggest the blue pill at this time for all Americans, especially in light of the article that just got leaked (Nov 11, 2005) saying how great it would be for Bush if another major terrorist attack occurred on American soil.
--------------
I would like to point out a very sad thing, and it is a very sad thing, indeed. It is sad for all Americans.

Because there is a fundamental problem with any story that the media could concoct to explain these 3 demolitions. (Especially after all these years)

For instance, they Bush administration could try to say, "Well, we couldn't really say this in the news, but after the 1993 bombing attempt, we decided to wire these buildings for a quick demolition should they ever be successful"

However, once the North and South tower are proven to have been demolished, there is the little matter of the demolitions starting on the same floors that the planes hit.

Are you going to tell me that the Hijackers woke up early Tuesday morning, wired two 110 floor skyscrapers for demolition, took a cab back to the airport, hijacked 4 planes with some box knives then somehow navigated back over several states to NYC (with no help from Air Traffic Control), meanwhile eluding what was supposed to be a whole lot of what I think Payne Stewart would agree is some pretty good fighter coverage.

Then they crashed their planes into these buildings and an hour later they pressed the button to blow them up? If Arab terrorists already had these buildings wired, couldn't they have used the extra planes on the Empire State building or Indian Point?

It took a respectable but small-sized group to pull off this attack. But it took a very, very large group to cover it up. This group is called the mainstream media.

Welcome to America 2005, a military dictatorship with thought control.

[patricia92243]

13. At the time, I told my sister that it looked like the building imploded

from within. When others said the iron had just melted from the heat, etc. I just thought I was mistaken and never thought about it again. Seems like I knew more than I thought I knew.

[Monkey see Monkey Do]

15. Aside from the fact that this is guff

you should know that the eminent professor cites an article by Chrisopher Bollyn in the "American Free Press". Aside from his controversy within the 9-11 conspiracy movement & his sloppy (or more so, invented) research Bollyn is a Holocaust denier & AFP is run by Willis Carto

[aquart]

17. Yah. This garbage is racist in essence.

It denies that anybody who isn't white could have had the smarts to bring down those big tall phalluses. So it had to be a brilliant scheme by white guys.

Of course, they still haven't figured out how anybody could PLANT those pre-positioned explosives which would have had to be in multiple trucks or, what? Shipped UPS to one of the offices? In lots and lots and lots of boxes?

Oh, wait, maybe it was just a tiny amount of nuclear material that made the big, big boom. Except the place isn't radioactive.

And they also forget that when a bomb in the basement was tried: IT DIDN'T WORK. Made a big smoky hole but the towers stood.

None of the logic stands up. Just the painful desire that OTHERS couldn't do this to us. So it had to be some of US, and if we just take care of US, we can control our world.

It's disinformation which poisons and discredits all investigation into 9/11. Which may well be a plot.

[jim3775]

16. We have a forum for stuff like this

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topics&forum=125