|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
ButterflyBlood (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-12-05 02:33 PM Original message |
If Roe v. Wade were overturned, what states would outlaw abortion? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNadir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-12-05 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
1. You are assuming that the supreme court will NOT declare a fetus a person, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orangepeel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-12-05 02:47 PM Response to Reply #1 |
5. exactly. who says states wil be able to allow it at all? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-12-05 02:59 PM Response to Reply #1 |
13. Watch the GOP go down in Flames VERY NEXT ELECTION. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bloodblister Bob (269 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-12-05 03:17 PM Response to Reply #1 |
16. If they do declare that a fetus has rights... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNadir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-12-05 06:07 PM Response to Reply #16 |
24. Personally I wouldn't find this inconsistent at all with how they think. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-12-05 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
2. Here is my list |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fishwax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-12-05 02:48 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. I'm not sure about all those, particularly some of the mountain states |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yupster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-12-05 06:08 PM Response to Reply #6 |
25. Utah and Idaho would be my two |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-12-05 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
3. ohio would outlaw it....then I would leave the state...most of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flying_wahini (856 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-12-05 02:54 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. ooooohhhhhh, North Texas????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-12-05 05:41 PM Response to Reply #10 |
22. Didn't mean to insult all the Texans...it's just that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coastie for Truth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-12-05 03:22 PM Response to Reply #3 |
18. Sounds like your neighbor to the East - Pennsylvania |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-12-05 02:40 PM Response to Original message |
4. Recent polls say "pro lifers" outnumber "pro choicers" in only 13 states. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WritingIsMyReligion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-12-05 02:48 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Thank fuck Maine's not on there. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostInAnomie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-12-05 02:55 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. The problem with that is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jefferson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-12-05 03:00 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. True for now. But you want to see one mammoth sleeping giant awake?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
enlightenment (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-12-05 02:49 PM Response to Original message |
8. Try this website |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flowomo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-12-05 02:51 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. thanks for the link.... very interesting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flowomo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-12-05 02:55 PM Response to Original message |
12. here is the breakdown based on the study referenced above: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UrbScotty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-12-05 03:07 PM Response to Original message |
15. Michigan: as long as Granholm's in office, things arer okay. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
longship (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-12-05 03:19 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Granholm is a pleasure on so many levels. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coastie for Truth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-12-05 03:27 PM Response to Original message |
19. If They even try in California-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solo_in_MD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-12-05 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
20. The underlying cause of much of this is that Roe was a poorly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-12-05 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
21. if roe v wade were overturned it would be a political disaster for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-12-05 05:43 PM Response to Original message |
23. KANSAS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ourbluenation (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-12-05 06:13 PM Response to Original message |
26. It will never be overturned because it is irrelavant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ourbluenation (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-12-05 06:15 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. oh - and in the meantime the righties will keep "fighting" to have it over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:09 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC