FORCED INOCULATIONS BIRD FLU PLAN

[G2099]

"Authority -- As provided in subsection (b), and subject to subsection (b) (1) C, a manufacturer, distributor, or administrator of a security countermeasure, or a qualified pandemic and epidemic product, or a health care provider shall be immune from suit or liability caused by or arising out of the design, development, clinical testing and investigation, manufacture, labeling, distribution, sale, purchase, donation, dispensing, prescribing, administration, or use of a countermeasure, or a qualified pandemic and epidemic product, described in subsection (b) (1) (a)."

That just about covers the waterfront, as they say. The only avenue of relief an injured vaccine or medicine recipient or survivor could follow is requesting an investigation of their allegation by the Secretary of Health and Human Services -- who would have to find "clear and convincing evidence" of "willful misconduct" that "caused the product to present a significant or unreasonable risk to human health and proximately caused the injury alleged by the party."

http://www.niagarafallsreporter.com/hanchette179.html

[aquart]

1. Unacceptable.

[babylonsister]

2. Nom. for all to see. I find the notion

that they'll try to force us to have an inoculation a bit absurd. This bunch of thugs is so inept I doubt they even have a plan much less a way to carry one out.. Perhaps this is another distraction?

[leveymg]

3. This bill doesn't force anyone to get innoculated. It does give pharma

a free pass, even if they screw up big time and thousands of people die due to negligent design or handling of their product.

Kind of removes the incentive to being really careful about their vaccines. I'll pass on this, as I have on flu shots in the past.

[beam me up scottie]

4. POINT OUT WHERE IT SAYS ANYTHING ABOUT FORCED INOCULATIONS IN S. 1873

Did you even read this before posting it?