AOL Poll on Fitzgerald's New Grand Jury

[biscotti]

Would it be the right move for Fitzgerald to involve a new grand jury in the leak case?
Yes, there are unanswered questions 80%
No, that would be going too far 16%
I'm not sure 4%
Total Votes: 3,821

http://aolsvc.news.aol.com/news/article.adp?id=20051118121109990006

[Nitrogenica]

1. Link?

pleeeze

[Window]

2. Done.

81% yes

[skipos]

3. 81 nt

[kevinmc]

4. Done.........

Would it be the right move for Fitzgerald to involve a new grand jury in the leak case?

Yes, there are unanswered questions 81%

No, that would be going too far 16%

I'm not sure 4%

Total Votes: 4,147

[stillcool]

5. done...

Yes, there are unanswered questions 81%
No, that would be going too far 16%
I'm not sure 4%
Total Votes: 4,202

[OPERATIONMINDCRIME]

6. Fuck that. That's The Most Pathetic Poll I've Ever Seen

What kind of fucking question is that? They are politicizing a federal criminal inquiry. How can you ask should he? That on its face turns it political. There is no should or not, if the investigation is not closed, then there needs to be a grand jury. CNN, as usual, should fucking be ashamed of themselves for the wording of that question. (It's like asking "Should Lee Boyd Malvo Have to have a trial too since John Muhammad already had one?" On its face it's just fucking stupid.)

[Sydnie]

7. 81% - Total Votes: 4,173 n/t

[FreedomAngel82]

8. Done

Go Fitzgerald!

Would it be the right move for Fitzgerald to involve a new grand jury in the leak case?
Yes, there are unanswered questions 81%
No, that would be going too far 15%
I'm not sure 4%
Total Votes: 4,270

at 7:36pm est

[BuyingThyme]

9. enod Y-81 N-15 NS-4 Total: 4289

[DemonFighterLives]

10. Done

81 and Go!

[Metta]

11. Done. Thanks.

nt