The Whiskey Priest
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-21-05 05:01 PM
Original message |
| This Bothers Me about This Fight to the Death against Terrorism |
|
Edited on Mon Nov-21-05 05:01 PM by The Whiskey Priest
This point: If we are so threatened that we must fight to the death for decades and decades; then why hasn’t the Republican Government required increased security at all of the chemical, nuclear, natural gas storage plants?
It would seem to be a logical first step towards defending the country. That is if they are sincere. Otherwise, it is sort of boogey man story?
|
| sarcasmo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-21-05 05:02 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Exactly the reason some of us here us the term. Al-CIA-DUH. |
| NanceGreggs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-21-05 05:03 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. "That is if they are sincere." |
|
That says it all, doesn't it?
|
| Burried News
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-21-05 05:06 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. Well despite record profits they just don't have the money. nt |
| izzie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-21-05 05:12 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. Because they also know you can not make it safe. |
|
Look at the Czar times. That was a police state with every one watching some one and still they had terrorists. Look at Bush in his bubble. It is silly
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:22 AM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
