Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AOL Poll: Katie Couric is considering CBS Nightly News to replace Rather

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 03:19 PM
Original message
AOL Poll: Katie Couric is considering CBS Nightly News to replace Rather
Edited on Sat Dec-03-05 03:20 PM by WiseButAngrySara
http://aolsvc.news.aol.com/tv/article.adp?id=20051202164609990017&ncid=NWS00010000000001

Would you be more likely to watch CBS Evening News if Katie Couric is the anchor?

No 72%
Yes 28%

Which are you more likely to watch?

Evening news 66%
Morning talk shows 34%

Total Votes: 80,500

edit typo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm happy with Bob Schieffer, he is somewhat Cronkite-esque
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. He's ancient
but I find him fair, with a good sense of humor.

Couric? Too "cute." Just can't take her seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. I don't watch the evening propaganda hour
but I've seen Schieffer a couple of times when I've clicked on the set to get the local weather and it's been on CBS. Schieffer seems to read the howlers he's told to read, but he gives every indication that they don't taste very good.

I guess that's better than some perky talking head who doesn't give a shit as long as the paycheck is regular.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. He is Friends With Bush - Check This Out
Schieffer on the Bush administration's prewar claims: "I still give them the benefit of the doubt

http://mediamatters.org/items/200512030003

Schieffer has a history of accepting false or misleading Republican claims about prewar intelligence. On the November 6 broadcast of Face the Nation, Schieffer interviewed Senate Intelligence Committee chairman Pat Roberts (R-KS). As Media Matters has noted, during a discussion on the program of Senate Democrats' demand for an investigation into how policymakers used intelligence in the buildup to war, Roberts claimed that for the "Report on the U.S. Intelligence Community's Prewar Intelligence Assessments on Iraq," which the committee released in 2004, "we interviewed over 250 analysts, and we specifically asked them, 'Was there any political manipulation or pressure?' Answer, 'No.' " Roberts then claimed that the March report of the Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United States Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction (i.e. the Robb-Silberman Commission) and the Butler report on British intelligence came to the "same conclusion." Whether Roberts was referring to the Bush administration's "manipulation" in the use of intelligence, as The New York Times interpreted his statement, or as part of the alleged "pressure" on analysts is unclear. If Roberts meant the former, his assertion is simply false -- none of the investigations addressed the issue of the administration's use or misuse of intelligence. If instead Roberts meant "manipulation" as interchangeable with "pressure" on analysts, his assertion was irrelevant to the issue on which Senate Democrats have demanded an investigation and was, therefore, highly misleading. At no point did Schieffer note that Roberts was either misrepresenting or simply avoiding the issue in question.

http://mediamatters.org/items/200512030003
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
begin_within Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Oh, ok thanks. Well then, I guess, poop on him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. I heard Bob on Imus saying how much he likes Gw

that did it for me and CBS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BJW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Save us Lord--eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. News... "LITE"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah, right--Katie Couric is talking to CBS to get a PAY RAISE from NBC
She doesn't want that job--it's too HARD. Sure, the on-air time is shorter, but the work that goes into preparing the broadcast is brutal...unless she doesn't want to involve herself in all that researching, writing, editing, fact-checking...and just wants to be a perky newsreader...

Bad move for CBS. Katie is like Harriet Miers, good at what she does, but she is not a hard news type. If they want a good woman in the anchor slot (and it is past time for that), get this fine lady:




Carole Simpson is anchor of "World News Tonight Sunday" and an Emmy Award-winning senior correspondent for ABC News. She reports most frequently on family and social issues for "World News Tonight With Peter Jennings." Her reports have also appeared on "20/20," "Nightline," and other ABC news broadcasts and specials. She is an occasional contributor to "This Week," and she has substituted for Peter Jennings on "World News Tonight." Ms. Simpson joined ABC News from NBC News in 1982. http://www.wchstv.com/abc/wntss/simpson.shtml

Brains, great judgment, a sense of humor, and easy to look at. What more could anyone want???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrueAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Wasn't she on Bill Mahar
And sticking up for big media. She sounded like a republican to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Well, the richer they get, the more "Greedy Old Party" they get n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benny05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. She moderated a debate once
And didn't do a very good job. I think it was during Clinton-Dole campaign or Gore-Bush one, but not entirely certain.

This is a tough one. I like Scott Pelley to get it but I think he won't; thus, I'd like to see a woman in the chair. Katie is not the person to do it, although I think she is trying to look more serious with her "glam" glasses. Another good person would be Charles Gibson, but I cannot see ABC losing him.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aimah Donating Member (598 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. Done
Would you be more likely to watch CBS Evening News if Katie Couric is the anchor?
No 72%
Yes 28%
Which are you more likely to watch?
Evening news 66%
Morning talk shows 34%
Total Votes: 86,024
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
andlor Donating Member (300 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. done
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
melody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. Are they considering Mickey Mouse as ambassador to China, too?
Sorry, Katie reminds me of a gerbil with a sugar fix.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalnurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. I sent a subliminal message with my vote.
I voted yes for Couric with the Evening News and told them I watch the Morning Shows........thus I do not want to watch that slut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justjones Donating Member (596 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. If bobble-head journalism is what they are going for....
then Katie Couric is the perfect choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
13. Colon issues=Republican.
Just sayin! :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adarling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
14. boo boo
i use to like watching her, but these past couple of years have started to sound just as annoying as listening to crappy morning talk radio. There is not enough news on it...too much let see what this celebrity is cooking for the holidays and stupid fashion tips. She use to be very good interviewing big political names and such, especially during Sept. 11. Such a shame
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greiner3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
16. Remember Murphy Brown?
I can't remember the character's name, but the co-anchor with Candice Brown was supposedly modeled after Katie Couric. She's all fluff and no substance. Maybe what CBS needs to get back on top of the news, but a bad choice in the long run. IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catchawave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Corky Sherwood !
and wasn't her character an ex-Miss America too? :rofl: I think you nailed it :)

Katie should stick to daytime fluff, spend quality time with her girls, AND a newsreader she's not!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
19. Oh, please...
Katie Couric doesn't have anywhere near the gravitas (love that word) to do the evening news. Much, much too perky.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
23. I have a hard time caring, actually.
News anchors are nothing like the days of Walter Cronkite nowadays. They just sit and read off a teleprompter. You could get Playgirl's "Man of the Year" or Playboy's "Pet of the Year" to read the news nowadays. News anchors have next to nothing to do with journalism anymore.

Katie Couric is just a pretty face and a nice personality. Nothing more, nothing less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
24. Trick question.
If Couric does evening news, evening news becomes morning talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
25. Done
Would you be more likely to watch CBS Evening News if Katie Couric is the anchor?
No 72%**
Yes 28%

Which are you more likely to watch?
Evening news 66%**
Morning talk shows 34%
Total Votes: 105,071
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC