aldian159
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 09:39 PM
Original message |
should the Dems write off the South? |
|
We're not gonna have the money/resources to fight Rove and co. on all fronts, so to speak. The South is solidly Republican, obviously. Should we just forgo the South and concentrate on states we can win, given our limited resources available in 2004? Or should we try to win southern voters and even snatch a state or two (beside FL, which is winnable either way)?
|
Closer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 09:40 PM
Response to Original message |
ShaneGR
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 09:40 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Nope... not if our nominee is Clark or Edwards |
blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 09:41 PM
Response to Original message |
3. No...we fight in all the states with veterans and military families. |
|
Bush isn't doing as well with them as the media is spinning. Alot of those states are in the South and a strong network has been built over the last year to reach out to them.
|
GR
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 09:42 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I Think Yes...We Don't Need Them And They Are Anathama... |
|
to my beliefs for one on just about every issue, race, religion, war, abortion....you name it....I don't see a way to bring them into the tent with those views.
HOWEVER...we should not SAY OUT LOUD that we are writing them off...
|
Warpy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
20. how about meeting halfway? |
|
Spend the most money where races are close. Don't count any state a sure thing and ignore it completely. Don't count the south out completely just because they're largely reactionary there.
People are furious at Bush all over the country. Let's tell them they do have a choice.
|
asjr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 09:42 PM
Response to Original message |
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 09:43 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Don't write off anybody |
|
Edited on Wed Nov-05-03 10:02 PM by mmonk
you can't chance a Bush re-election (besides, I don't want to be written off). Clinton won because he won some southern states.
|
aldian159
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. why did clinton appeal to you mmonk and your brethren? |
|
I'm intrested in the views of a Southerner (I live in Chicago, Democrat stronghold since WWII).
|
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
13. He seemed to have vision |
|
especially when he talked about the 21st century. Hope for a better future for every American. He also said that some of the things you might like about republicans such as tax credits, tax cuts for the middle class, he could give but also more with a progressive agenda.
|
Zynx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 09:47 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Don't write it off, but refine our strategy. |
|
We should focus mainly on states like Missouri(kind of a southern state), Arkansas, Louisiana, Tennessee, and possibly(I do mean possibly) Virginia. To win these states you need to be pro-gun and somewhat moderate on environmental issues. If there's one thing these states hate, it's a hippie.
Personally, I like a western strategy to compliment this because these states hinge on similar issues. We can win states like Colorado, Arizona, and Nevada on similar issues. The same goes for Ohio and West Virginia.
|
aldian159
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
the only reason we lost it in 2000 was Gore, Mr. Enviroment, was running. The WV coal miners hated that
|
Wellong
(219 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 10:15 PM
Original message |
|
but gun control cost him a lot of votes in WV as well.
|
PROGRESSIVE1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 09:47 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Southern States that we should fight in: |
|
Virginia, South Carolina, Louisiana, Arkansas, Florida, and Tennessee!
These are states that lean to the right or in the case of Louisiana, it is a swing state! If Clark is the nomminee, which I hope he is, then South Carolina will be in play too!
Forget Georgia and Mississippi, they've gone down the toilet!
|
Zynx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
14. South Carolina in play? Don't make me laugh. |
|
Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Kentucky, North Carolina, and South Carolina are all lost causes. Don't even bother with any of them.
|
PROGRESSIVE1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
19. The military families may like Clark!!!! |
|
But that's a maybe! We would do better campaigning in Kansas and North Dakota!
|
blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
25. Wrong...those are big military states |
|
with military families and veteran's organizations that aren't too happy with Bush.
|
Zynx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
28. Still, it would take an act of God to overcome those margins in those |
blm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
34. Read this from Joe Klein's New Yorker piece |
|
>>>>>>> The real business of the day was transacted afterward. Kerry mingled easily with the vets, who were mostly African-American; he cussed and joked and talked about places like Da Nang and Da Lat. A pink-faced overweight man approached. "I'm Jim Gunn," he said to Kerry. "Do you remember me?"
Kerry nodded warily. Gunn was the leader of the Coalition of Retired Military Veterans and had attacked Senator John McCain during the 2000 Republican Presidential primary in South Carolina. Kerry had written a letter protesting the charges that another veterans' group had made against McCain-essentially, that McCain was "anti-veteran"-and he had got the other Vietnam combat veterans in the Senate to sign it. Now Jim Gunn said to him, "I just want you to know, Senator, that you were right about McCain and I was wrong. Bush lied to my face, and I'll never support him again." Gunn proceeded to file a bill of particulars against the President on veterans' issues. Then he sighed and said, "I wish there was a machine that could really say when someone is telling the truth, but you sound sincere when you talk about our issues. I represent seventeen thousand vets in South Carolina-I'm like their union boss-and if you run for President next time we're with you." ........
|
Wellong
(219 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #28 |
|
my state, has a Dem Governor, Dem state senate and 1 seat minority in the state house. Sure the state went for Bush, Dole, Bush the last 3 elections, but that doesnt mean it is not winnable.
|
bluestateguy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 09:48 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Wed Nov-05-03 09:59 PM by bluestateguy
All that does is free up campaign resources for the other side to go trolling for votes in Minnesota, Pennslyvania or even California. All giving the South to Bush for free does is make us have to work all that much harder for states that we should be able to win comfortably.
On edit: I would play hard in Florida, Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee and Louisiana. I would make a 50% effort in Georgia and North Carolina and let Bush have Texas, Mississippi, Alabama and South Carolina.
|
QC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 09:48 PM
Response to Original message |
11. A monumentally bad strategy, for several reasons. |
|
1. The Congress. "Write off the South" and we can forget about ever having control of the Congress again. If the Clinton years taught us anything, it should be that there's more to political power than the White House.
2. There are states in the South that are winnable, and others that are trending our way. Why write them off?
3. The Southern and border states contain app. 60% of the electoral votes needed to win the election. Would you want to run a 100 yard dash in which your opponent gets to start at the 60 yard point? Sure, you can still win, but it's not likely.
4. Publicly "write off the South" and you will lose the legislatures here, most of which are Democratic. Have we all forgotten who does reapportionment? The state legislatures. If you want to see what was done in Texas done in twelve or fourteen other states, then "write off the South."
5. If we "write off the South" then Bush can spend his entire $200,000,000 in "our" states.
6. The South is home to a major share of the nation's minority voters. In fact, Mississippi and Alabama have more black elected officials than the rest of the country combined. "Writing off the South" means writing them off along with many millions of black voters.
|
DemocratSinceBirth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-03 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
46. You Are 100% Right.... |
|
Not only does the South have alot of electoral votes it's going to get more with each reapportionment as more people leave the Frost Belt for the Sun Belt...
|
QC
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-03 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #46 |
Kahuna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 09:50 PM
Response to Original message |
15. No. We don't have to pander to them to win... |
|
Clinton managed to win some southern states. It can be done.
|
aldian159
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
|
any VA people, please respond. Do you think we can win your state in 04?
|
Broderick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
23. Virginia would be tough |
|
Tough call here. East is very military. West is rural. North is Democrat.
based on disappointing voting (redistricting helped repub) in assembly and such yesterday.
|
newyawker99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-03 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #23 |
jiacinto
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
35. Not next year, but in the coming years |
|
Fairfax County just elected a Democrat to the office of County Executive. They gained two House seats. Fairfax County has trended toward the Democrats. In 1988 the Bush I campaign won with a 60% majority. In 1992 and 1996 the Republican margin shrank. By 2000, although Bush carried the county, the Nader and Gore totals outnumbered his.
If the trend continues then VA could very well be in play in future cycles. VA is home to a large Hispanic and Arab population. With time their numbers might be enough to swing VA in our direction.
|
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-03 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
54. The entire Clinton Gore ticket was a pander to the South. |
spunky
(469 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 09:53 PM
Response to Original message |
16. No one should be written off |
|
Even though I know it doesn't matter who I vote for next November because Bush will win Mississippi, I don't want us to be given up on.
Rather than throw in the towel, Dems have to get creative and find a new way to appeal to Southern voters.
|
newyawker99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-03 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
Classical_Liberal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 09:53 PM
Response to Original message |
17. I think we can pear off the midsouth in the nearterm |
|
and the deep south in the long term. I do want Georgia though. It is always a toss up and I want to get Zig Zag Zell.
|
Zynx
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
21. Georgia has a perception of being a moderate state. |
|
But it isn't. It voted for Barry Goldwater of all people and voted for Bush by 13 points. We need to carry the nation by 8 in order to win Georgia.
|
aldian159
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
22. how the hell do you see us getting GA? |
|
Its the state that thought Max Cleland wasn't patriotic, never mind the fact he left three limbs in vietnam.
|
AndyTiedye
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
31. The Majority in FL and GA May Try To Vote Democratic... |
|
But many of their votes will be counted as Republican and many will be turned away at the polls.
We can't "give up on" the South but we need to focus our very limited resources where the votes will count.
|
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 10:07 PM
Response to Original message |
|
my state's last two governors have been democrats (NOT dixiecrats). They run on progressive issues as well such as more money for education and early childhood programs. So to write North Carolina off is a mistake. It just takes work.
|
aldian159
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
26. who do you see to replace Edwards in NC? |
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
|
I'm hoping Bowles but it will be a fight with Burr.
|
Blue_Roses
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 10:10 PM
Response to Original message |
|
we haven't even started to fight. Why give up before we begin to fight. This needs to be a huge wake-up call that this will boil down to the conservatives and the south.
|
jiacinto
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 10:11 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Wed Nov-05-03 10:13 PM by jiacinto
While it is "technically" possible to "win" without the South it requires a zero margin for error. It means winning EVERY blue state, plus taking WV, NH, and OH. It means probably wininng one of these three: NV, CO, AZ. It means that EVERYTHING--and I do mean everything--has to go our way. We cannot lose one blue state.
The southern states that are the most winnable are:
FL LA AR TN MO KY -------------------------------------------------------------------------
The southern states that might be competetive next year or in the future are:
VA NC GA --------------------------------------------------------------------------
The southern states that are not winnable at all unless Bush loses in a landslide are (even then it would take a miracle to win):
SC AL MS TX OK
|
lastliberalintexas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 10:11 PM
Response to Original message |
30. The South is NOT solidly republican! |
|
Edited on Wed Nov-05-03 10:16 PM by lastliberalintexas
The VOTING South is- and there is a huge difference between the two.
I'm sorry to keep beating a dead horse since I post this every time a southern thread rears its ugly head, but what we need to do in the South is work on increasing turnout. We have some of the lowest voter turnout rates in the country, and our number of residents registered isn't so great either. (for example, Texas ranks 48 and 49 in those categories) Even more unfortunate, minorities *tend* to vote in lower numbers than whites. (I said tend- I am not trying to stereotype anyone)
I know turnout is an issue in every part of the country, but no where is it more of a Dem killer than in the South, where on average more than 60% of registered voters fail to vote. Note that that figure only goes to registered voters- it doesn't even speak to the number of residents who don't vote because they aren't even registered.
Four things we must do in the South to win future elections: 1- register voters 2- get people to the polls 3- speak to EVERY Southerner and ask for EVERY Southerner's vote 4- get our message out so that the repub spin on Dems isn't the basis of opinion down here
Sorry that this is such a pet peeve of mine, but the South is really no more repub than the rust belt states in a good turnout year. We shouldn't pander to Southerners (or anyone based on region), but we shouldn't write the South off as repub either.
|
doubles
(357 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 10:13 PM
Response to Original message |
33. Thanks to Dean, YES, and maybe the election if he is nominated! |
Wellong
(219 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #33 |
38. Care to expand on that? |
newyawker99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-03 06:25 AM
Response to Reply #33 |
Guaranteed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-03 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #33 |
49. No- thanks Sharpton, and Edwards. nt |
Scott Lee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 10:25 PM
Response to Original message |
37. DLC statists obviously wanted to write off the South all along |
|
Look at the way they tried to tar and feather Howard Dean when he tried to reach out to poorer white southern laborers.
|
jsw_81
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Nov-05-03 10:30 PM
Response to Original message |
|
We can definitely win in Florida and possibly Arkansas with Clark on the ticket. The other southern states are, however, lost causes when it comes to presidential elections. The Democratic nominee has zero chance of winning in MS, AL, GA etc.
|
Skidmore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-03 06:28 AM
Response to Original message |
43. Absolutely not, but what Dems should do is |
|
to get their crap together and someone needs to drop out of this large field of candidates so that we come up with a coherent message and fast. McAuliffe's push to start campaigning more than a year before primaries and caucuses was stupid. At this point, most people could probably recite from memory the stump speeches and stock phrases of every one of those candidates.
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-03 06:38 AM
Response to Original message |
44. NO, we need to be stronger in OUR values |
|
If we believe we're right about our values, then we need to stand up and shout it from the rooftops. We don't take one step backwards, but we DO make a massive effort. The one thing Dean has done is mobilize people. The DNC needs to mobilize people. If we would all just get behind what the Democratic Party has accomplished in the last 100 years and put up a cohesive fight for those principles and what it will mean for the next 100 years, we can win the whole damn country. We're RIGHT, they're WRONG. They being Republicans, not southerners.
And the reason I'm against Dean is because he keeps backing away from those Democratic principles. I don't want it and I don't believe we can win that way.
|
BlueCollar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-03 06:39 AM
Response to Original message |
|
I can't see why any time or money should be expended down here...
|
ringmastery
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-03 06:53 AM
Response to Original message |
47. Concentrate on Florida |
|
FLORIDA - get graham on the ticket as VP, he may be boring but he'll give you the best shot of getting florida and the 27 electoral votes.
If Gore picked Graham as VP in '00, he would be president of the United States right now. There isn't any doubt in my mind about that.
If you get florida, you CAN write off the rest of the south. It's a gamble though, if you lose florida, basically you are screwed.
|
dusty64
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-03 08:23 AM
Response to Original message |
50. The results of the Louisiana |
|
race will go a long way in determining how many resources should be expended in the South. A Democratic win will show that what has been happening is basically a "throw the incumbent out" mood, it just happens to be that mainly Democratic incumbents have been affected so far. If the rethug "wins" however, it won't be a good sign. Florida, Arkansas, Tennesee, and Louisiana should still be contested, but the electronic "voting" issue NEEDS to be resolved. I still have a hard time buying what supposedly happened in Georgia.
|
Yupster
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-03 10:41 AM
Response to Original message |
|
they ever want to win the senate back.
You can't let Bush win S Carolina by 20 % and then expect the Democratic senate candidate to win there, That's too much tide to fight against.
|
Le Taz Hot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-03 10:45 AM
Response to Original message |
52. I am SO sick of these posts |
|
on SO many levels. It's typical DNC-thinking and it's a losing strategy. God, this smacks of elitim which has become, tragically, acceptable by too many on DU. No, we should NOT abandon the South. Nor should we abandon rural voters, nor should we continue to abandon the base nor the 50% of Americans who have given up or have never been involved in the first place.
|
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-03 10:49 AM
Response to Original message |
53. We need to quit thinking of the South as a monolith! |
|
There are some states in the South that we might be able to get. There are other states in the south that are a waste of our time, money, and effort. We need to considere every state in the union in a case by case manner.
|
Terwilliger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-03 10:51 AM
Response to Original message |
55. Write off the nearly-half of Southern voters who vote Dem? |
|
You folks have strange ways of looking at things... So, if Alabama is 52% Bush and 48% Gore....we just write off that 48% of those folks that voted with us? Write them off?
Hmmmmmmmmm.
|
JVS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-03 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #55 |
57. Well they don't count to the EC |
|
Consider this. If you had a state that went for Bush in 2000 with 58% against 42%, does it help to work hard to make it 55% against 45% in Bush's favor?
|
Terwilliger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-03 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #57 |
58. sure...while alienating half the people who voted for you |
|
sounds like a plan to me :eyes:
|
rman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-06-03 10:55 AM
Response to Original message |
56. ignore half the electorate? guaranteed loss |
|
why would the DLC push such a policy?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 10th 2024, 02:35 PM
Response to Original message |