Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"There is no way 'Clark' can lose"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 11:46 AM
Original message
"There is no way 'Clark' can lose"
How many of you have said:

There is no way Clark can lose.

There is no way Dean can lose.

There is no way Kerry can lose.

There is no way Edwards can lose.

Etc.

I raise this point because the other night during the Rock The Vote forum at a our Clark get together a number of people said that very thing about the General, and I immediately wondered how many other people who support any presidential candidate have said that exact same thing. I encourage all of you to do what you can to work hard, challenge and support your candidate and do what you can do to make sure he or she does not lose.

The next time you think your candidate has a perfect lock on the nomination take a moment to realize that there hundreds of thousands of people who feel that exact same way about someone else. I look forward to all of us on the DU reuniting in August 2004 (maybe sooner) and working to together to take back the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. There is no way Larouche can lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedda_foil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. There is no way ....
that ANY candidate has a lock on the nomination at this point. IMHO, anyone who says this about any one of our candidates is well over the top in their enthusiasm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. But have you heard it before. . .
. . .I have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
munayman Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's either Clark or Bush...make a choice
Edited on Thu Nov-06-03 11:51 AM by munayman
If Clark doesn't win the nomination, then we will have four more years of Bush. He is the only candidate that has the slightest chance of winning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. 2 Tru!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. So, UNTRUE
I think most of them have a good shot of beating Dumbo.

And I'm also starting to worry about Clark. Let's all remember FL in 2002 when Dems got worried that Janet Reno would be too liberal to beat Jeb, so they picked what's-his-face. Anyway, he ran a lousy campaign, and didn't fire anyone up. He was crushed.

People are going for Clark mainly because they believe he has the best chance to beat Bush, but my concern is that he doesn't fire anyone up. So far, I see a lackluster campaign on his part, which doesn't bode well for the general election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. This is not a candidate discussion thread. . .
. . .its a thread with the purpose to get everyone to consider that their own candidate (in my case Clark) may not be the person chosen to lead the Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brian Sweat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. I support Clark,
but I believe you are wrong. I think Bush is vulnerable and anyone who runs a good campaign had a good chance to beat him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Hi munayman!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kinkistyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
10. Notme.
I am all for Clark, but I have never said "Clark can't lose", I say "Clark can beat Bush!". To tell you the truth, haven't seen anybody who has claimed that their candidate is unbeatable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
11. There is no way Harry Browne can lose
You're right. Everyone says it. But I believe very strongly that whichever D wins the nomination, the D can't lose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomUser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I'm not so sure about that
Miracles happen.

But I believe very strongly that whichever D wins the nomination, the D can't lose.

If the economy is in a real verifiable job gain boom, and Iraq is patched up with good progress and developments. Or if we suddenly capture Saddam or Bin Laden on the week before elections, or if we discover a horde of biochemical WMDs in Iraq the weekend before the polls -- Bush may win, no matter who the Dem nominee is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HazMat Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. I've never thought that "my guy can't lose"
But I'm pretty sure he gives us the best chance to win. No one without solid national security/foreign policy credentials stands a chance, which is why Kerry and Clark (if he improves his campaigning skills) are the only electable candidates of this bunch.

Gephardt may stand a chance because of his midwest positioning and wealth of experience, but he's not strong on foreign policy and he's going to raise taxes. The last guy to promise an increase in taxes "for the good of the country" lost 49 states.

And I'm sure of this : There's no way Dean can win, and it's pretty likely he would be beaten badly and take the party down with him.

Of all the major candidates - Kerry, Clark, Gephardt, Edwards, Lieberman - Dean stands the least chance of beating Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC