Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clark - "I never gave a penny to the Republican party"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Clark Can WIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 01:37 PM
Original message
Clark - "I never gave a penny to the Republican party"
That and TONS of great stuff from General Clark in a really great NHPR interview with Laura Knoy. Lot's about Kosovo, his service in Vietnam. The little nugget that Republicans care about weapons, Democrats care about people. Good stuff.

Including the fact that after giving up on being an astronaut (nearsighted), he was torn between going with the career track or.................. becoming a theoretical physicist.

http://www.nhpr.org/view_content/5339/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
3CardMonte Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Never?
I find this hard to believe. Maybe he is correct on a technicality. Possibly he never wrote a personal check to the GOP, but I see no difference in that and attending, and speaking at GOP fundraisers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. This is what wes said in 2001...at that fundraiser....you guys have to...
start reading, and stop talking.

clark's lincoln day speech:
http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110004065

two paragraphs up from the maligned "praise" we find this:
------------------------
But we're also extremely vulnerable. Our economy--we're using three times--we've got three times as much foreign investment as we're investing--capital flow--as we're putting out there. They're investing here because they believe in us. We're using energy like it's going out of style. We're using five to eight times as much energy per capita as people in the rest of the world, twice as much as even the Europeans. We're vulnerable to security threats--everything from terrorism to the developing missiles that are--we know rogue states are developing to aim at us.

And so I think we have to have a new strategy, and we have to have a consensus on the strategy, and we have to have a bipartisan consensus, and politics has to stop in America at the water's edge. We've got to reach out, and we've got to find those people in the world and share our values and beliefs--and we've got to reinforce them. We've got to bring them here and let them experience the kind of life that we have. They've got to get an education here. They've got to be able to send their children here. They they've got to go home. And they've got to carry the burdens in their own lands, and to some extent we have to help them.
----------------------------
notice that in the frist paragraph clark talks enviromentalism to a republican audience.
also note the warning about terrorism pre-9/11.
notice in the second paragraph he talks about bipartisanship, and reaching out to the world community. two traits that he shares spot on with his positions today.

here is the full paragraph of contention:
------------------
You see, in the Cold War we were defensive. We were trying to protect our country from communism. Well guess what, it's over. Communism lost. Now we've got to go out there and finish the job and help people live the way they want to live. We've got to let them be all they can be. They want what we have. We've got some challenges ahead in that kind of strategy. We're going to be active, we're going to be forward engaged. But if you look around the world, there's a lot of work to be done. And I'm very glad we've got the great team in office: men like Colin Powell, Don Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, Condolzeezza Rice, Paul O'Neill--people I know very well--our president, George W. Bush. We need them there, because we've got some tough challenges ahead in Europe.
----------------------
notice he says he is glad to have them in office for the challenges ahead in EUROPE! obviously they have failed in holding europe to our cause.
also notice how the core of his new american patriotism is taking shape with the "be all you can be" remark.

in the next two paragraphs he further defines the european challenges:
-------------------------
We've got a NATO that's drifting right now. I don't know what's happened to it. But the situation in the Balkans where we've still got thousands of American troops, it's in trouble. It's going downhill on us as we're watching it. Our allies haven't quite picked up the load on that. But our allies say they're going to build a European security and defense program with a rival army to NATO. Well, I think it's a political imperative that they do more for defense, but I think we have to understand that that linkage between the United Sates and Europe, that bond on security, that's in our interest.
Look, in politics they told me--I don't know anything about politics now, I want to make that clear. But they told me--I read, do my reading in Time magazine and so forth. And they said in politics you've always got to protect your base. Well, for the United States, our base is Europe. We've got to be there, and we've got to be engaged in Europe. And that means we've got to take care of NATO, we've got to make sure the Europeans stay in it, and we've got to stay with the problem in the Balkans, even though we don't like it. We will get it resolved, and we'll help bring democracy and Westernization to those countries there.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
3CardMonte Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. And this has what to do with
his claim that he "never gave a penny to the republican party"?

I stand by my post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaintLouisBlues Donating Member (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. You posted fundraisers, as in more than one.
Wrong. Stand by that.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
3CardMonte Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. It is my understanding
that Clark has attended and/or spoke at more than one GOP fundraising event. Until I am shown to be wrong, and that he has only attended and/or spoke at a single one I will continue to stand by my post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark Can WIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Ah, but when you just throw unsubsatiated pure SHIT out there
and don't have the info to back it up, you get the fan effect. Unless YOU can back it up (since you're the one who threw it out) it's meaningless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
3CardMonte Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. For the time being
lets reduce my statement to Clark attending/speaking at a SINGLE GOP fundraiser. Ok. Now, how does that square with statement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark Can WIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Your statement was pointless, he did not dispute speaking at one
Or attending one. He said he never gave a penny to Republicans.

Now if you want to go with him speaking as a contribution, you'll also have to consider the LLLOOOOONNNGGG list of things he said at that function they DID NOT want to hear. So that would kind of fall under the "throw in a nickel take out a dime" catagory.

Like I said pointless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DealsGapRider Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. BFD.
He practically deep-throated Bush in front of the camera in 2002. Are we supposed to be impressed that he never gave money to the Repugs?

That's like when Chris Rock castigates men who proudly proclaim that they've never been to jail. As Rock says, "That's what you're supposed to do!"

Are we, um, setting the bar a little low?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark Can WIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm glad you took the time to listen
before you launched your attacks. Of course you probably read the ENTIRE transcript of that speech as well. Because someone like you wouldn't accept quotes out of context without examining the full truth just because it might fit your agenda.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. We are not
I understand that you do not support him. Fine. Some of us made the decistion to support Clark with lots of thought, information, analysis of the where politics are now. I acknowledge that Clark made a stupid speech in 2001. What his actions are and were sway me much more. I see him as a person who can address many issues that the repukes raise with the protection of the military background. He also has the intelligence and winning smile to get elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. So what is the difference
Between lying out of ignorance or by design? And does the resulting character damage differ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
returnable Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Post deleted by me
Edited on Thu Nov-06-03 02:37 PM by returnable
I'm taking my own advice and Moving On.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DealsGapRider Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Dennis Kucinich is NOT my man.
Let me be clear about this: I think he is an embarrassment to our party. He's the kind of guy who drives centrists and independents fleeing from the Democratic Party with his radical views, venomous rhetoric and kooky ideas.

I'm for Dean (I think), a true centrist with a solidly progressive, compassionate anchor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julien Sorel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Compassionate centrism?
I'm for Dean (I think), a true centrist with a solidly progressive, compassionate anchor.


Dean is so incredibly unsympathetic that you feel obliged to stick the word 'compassionate' in there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DealsGapRider Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Are you asking me a question? I don't understand your post.
Yes, I think he's a genuinely compassionate man. I think it is his fundamental human decency that compelled him to support universal health care in Vermont, recognize civil unions, etc. Do you not agree?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julien Sorel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I think any Democrat would have supported those things.
Edited on Thu Nov-06-03 02:32 PM by BillyBunter
I simply find your word choice unusual. The Republicans have an agenda that is so people-unfriendly that they have to try to hide behind the phrase 'compassionate conservatism' as a smokescreen, and here we have a Democrat with a Republican-like aversion to public spending, and you use similar language to what Republicans do to describe the guy. Things like that stand out to me.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DealsGapRider Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. I think you're reading too deeply, deep thinker.
Dean's compassion stands out to me, so I chose to highlight it as one of the qualities that attract me to him.

Democrats might nominally stand for all those things, but the other candidates don't telegraph genuine concern for dispossessed people the way Dean does (at least to me). Even Kucinich doesn't convince me that he's really for the working poor. Rather, I think it's his hostility to the fundamental concept of profit that motivates him, not his concern for people. Dean is someone who tirelessly fights for poor people, yet who was friendly to business in Vermont. That's what Democratic centrism is all about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julien Sorel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. I've never seen anything particularly compassionate
about the guy, but I suppose it's a case of beauty being in the eye of the beholder. I also don't see where Dean has 'tirelessly fought for the poor,' given his record of cutting public spending in Vermont, and some of his choicer comments about welfare and medicare, and his desire to balance the federal budget without reducing military spending.

Dean, more compassionate than Kucinich. Yep. I think I have it now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Why is it when talking about Dean...
Edited on Thu Nov-06-03 02:35 PM by SahaleArm
his supporters claim two things, healthcare, most of which was federally funded, and civil unions, which he signed after the supreme court forced the issue. Dean was a pro-NAFTA, anti-medicare, DLC governer. Why doesn't Dean run on the platform that got him to the dance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
returnable Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. Apologies...
Edited on Thu Nov-06-03 02:35 PM by returnable
...on linking you to DK. I just glanced at your tag and didn't read it completely.

My bad.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Don't try to foist that nasty twit on us
DGP is deeply offended that Kucinich exists, let alone is in the race. Dean's his guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. You mean when he gave Bush some due for afganistan????
Do did they all:

My research shows that the following was said by the following candidates, of course I am not going to provide the context, so that I may be elevated to the techniques a la Drudge:
Howard Dean
May 22, 2003
Here is a quote from Howard Dean, praising George W. Bush's war in Afghanistan.
I supported the invasion of Afghanistan and the elimination of the Taliban. I thought that group was a clear and present danger to the United States, and I supported what the President did.
--------------------------------------------------------
Joseph Lieberman
January 2002: praising George W. Bush's war in Afghanistan.
America’s great military strength, including particularly the precision air attack and special forces capabilities built up by President Clinton during the 1990s, and commanded so well by President Bush over the past year, has been stunningly impressive in this war to date.
http://www.gwu.edu/~action/2004/lieberman/lieb011402sp.html
------------------------------------------------
Dick Gephardt
June 2002
foreign policy speech from June 2002 where he expresses agreement with Bush foreign policy, and discusses some success in Afghanistan.

“We must be prepared to build alliances in regions that flare up unexpectedly. Afghanistan is the best example of this today. The Administration deserves credit for the military victory there. http://www.gwu.edu/~action/2004/gephardt/geph060402sp.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. speaking of astronauts
I heard some Republican criticize Clark for an old quote where he said that he thought someday, mankind would be capable for faster than light travel saying that it flew in the face of physics & Einstein...

They'll jump on anything, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
3CardMonte Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Time travel
did't Clark make some assinine comments about using time travel to fix things in the not so distant past?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Gross misrepresentation
What he said was he believes that, at SOME point in time in the future, mankind will be able to do FTL travel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. I know...
...that really hacked me off. As a scifi and science buff/fan, I found their ridiculous twisting on that pretty offensive. Clark said that he believes in mans ingenuity and has hopes that mankinds ambition might one day make faster than light travel possible. Some jackass reporter recalled a science friday film he saw from 1972 and proclaimed "Clark wants to time travel!," once again demonstrating that dumbasses see only what they want to see and hear only what they wish to hear. They did the same thing with Dennis Kucinich's proposed legislation on banning space based military platforms. I like people that seem to do a little dreaming inbetween their doing. Heck, I hope to be able to go live on a retirement community on Mars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Yeah
Clark will cheerily admit that the idea of FTL travel fascinates him and he'll talk with anyone anywhere about it, including times that it's come up in meetups. It's one of the things he's geeky about, not something that he'll try to divert national resources into. The slant from the Wired article I read was that the General had some sort of moonbat passion that made his handlers nervous, blatantly stupid spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. "retirement community on Mars."
Me too my friend. Me too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
26. Are you a freeper?
You sound like one. And after 12 posts??? Hmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaintLouisBlues Donating Member (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
32. More right wing talking points, eh monte?
Your user name is appropriate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. They should read "Hyperspaces" by Michio Kaku
(here) or The Elegant Universe by Brian Greene. Clark seems like the kind of guy who has those on his shelf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-03 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. Listening to it now.
It is good stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC