Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone else hear Schwartzkopf's comments re: Clark this AM?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 04:47 PM
Original message
Anyone else hear Schwartzkopf's comments re: Clark this AM?
Stormin' Norman was on (I think) MSNBC this morning stating that Clark was fired as NATO commander for issues of "character and integrity," which makes him unfit to be President, in Schwartzkopf's opinion.
Anyone know the story of the NATO commander firing thing??

Wonder what he thinks about having a lying sack of shit deserter as Commander In Thief....isn't that a character and integrity issue???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Norman who?
Oh yah..he's the guy who won the nintendo war. The dudes just jealous that Wes brought all his men home alive!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ForestsBeatBushes Donating Member (633 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, I think that means
Clark either stood up to Norm or he had some questions...no questions are allowed in the military, doncha know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. that goes to show how Clark's uniform can't be all that shiny
Many people liked Stormin' Norman, and still do. I remember talk about having him run for the Presidency at the time. Binging him out against Clark will definitely hurt Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
27. All he did was rehash what Gen. Shelton said a few weeks ago
Edited on Fri Nov-07-03 05:28 PM by lancdem
notice no one ever provides details. Schwarzkopf is a Repub. His commnents are hardly a surprise. Yawn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RummyTheDummy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
32. Oh puhhhhhhhhhhhllleeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeezzzzeeeeeee!!!!
Whatever Stormin Norman the Fraud has to say about anything has zero relevance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Finally some intelligence!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
returnable Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Didn't hear the comments from Norman...
...but they sound pretty much identical to the junk that Shelton spewed a few weeks back.

The rightwing meme rolls on.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waistdeep Donating Member (469 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. He just repeated Shelton's story
He had nothing to add himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. retired two months early
by getting a signing by Clinton pushed by the pentagon on the basis they need time for the new appointment. His character is fine. He dared disgree on strategy and high altitude bombing I believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. The Pentagon didn't like Clark
Because he didn't follow doctrine and because he was, if anything, too gung-ho about doing the right thing. Doesn't sound like a character issue to me. That and Clark has admitted that he didn't get along too well with the "good ol' boys club" that is the upper ranks of the military brass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. I have a unique perspective on the General
Norman, that is...having served him drinks during a low-stakes card game he takes part in regularly.

I've often thought waitstaff have good insight into character, how you behave when being served reflects on you, etc. etc.

The guy's something of a jackass. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Let's hear more.
This could be good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. I completely agree that how you treat wait staff shows who
you are. If you are disrespectful than you are rude in other aspects of your life. I pay attention to the stories about how candidates treat the staff and waiters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
39. Amen! How People Tip Is A Good Indicator To!
I've friends who've driven, waited and hosted for some really wealthy and famous types and it's interesting to find out who treats others like equals and who acts like their you-know-what don't stink.

Somerich people are lousy tippers. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. "waitstaff have good insight into character"
Edited on Fri Nov-07-03 05:03 PM by WhoCountsTheVotes
oh yes, some people forget that a *human being* is doing the serving, and people who forget that reveal a lot about their character.

so says WCTV, former waiter, busser, and barback!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #18
41. and my mother. Best advice she ever gave me.
I thought Clark handled this attempt at defamation extremely well during the next-to-last debate. Among other things, he said no one has told him yet exactly what the bases of these complaints are. I have not since that time heard any evidence from Shelton or anyone else.

If people have specific incidents that they care to trot out as indicative of his bad behavior, then let's hear them and give him a chance to respond. I have no interest in vague smears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. Yes, waitstaff can tell a hell of a lot about a person
their general attitude, and their flexibility. Plus, you can find out how cheap or generous they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMan Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
38. You mean an ILLEGAL low stakes card game?
Taking the high road, huh General?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
9. Clark went over the brass's heads
Went to the WH for support. That is not a character issue, it's standing up for what you believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Clark was going to stop the war. The pentagon wanted chaos to help Bush
and Republicans win the election.

Also, in The Clinton Wars, Blumenthal writes about how Tories in the Major government were making money selling arms to Milosevic, and getting in on privitization deals with him. I think the RW'ers planned to make some money off that fucker, and they're pissed that Clark wasn't playing ball for their team.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
11. OK found a link with some information....
http://pub73.ezboard.com/fwesleyclark200463811frm12.showMessage?topicID=31.topic

Seems that Cohen wanted to put one of his buddies in that position, so that's part of it...read the link for more info.
Sounds like Normie was overstating the case by quite a lot...
Character and integrity??? Don't think that played into it at all from what I am seeing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
13. I hope
That Clark gets on the ball with this and kills this bs asap or his entire candidacy could probably sink in the face of RW bs. Teh nagain, knowing hte general he will probably jump on this and kill it quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
15. Fuck Norman
He'll still talk up Powell after that SOB screwed him in Gulf War I, forcing him into a ground war he was trying to avoid:

http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/122600b.html

I couldn't care less what Norm thinks about Clark. He's a shill for the Bushies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. exactly
I heard them interview one general who said he wouldn't vote for him. When the reporter asked why not, he wouldn't say anything except he wouldn't vote for anyone in "that" party. When asked how good a job he would do, he replied Clark would do a good job, that his position and rank would have provided him with the skills and that he would be one of the most detailed and prepared presidents if elected (they don't like his politics).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #20
29. He did his part
playing the skeptical warhorse, worrying about Dubya's hardon for Iraq -- no case for war, build a coalition first, no rush, too dangerous, blah, blah. Then the fat bastard turned on a dime. What convinced him? Powell's "compelling" UN presentation, the one that fell apart in real time and made us a laughingstock.

"Saddam Hussein is a monster," he said. "The mere thought of Saddam Hussein with a nuclear, biological, chemical capability is frightening to me because the difference between him and some of the other nuclear powers is the fact that he'll use them, and that's what makes it scary."

Eek, you can hear him shivering. Feh. He knew Saddam was even more beat down than when he faced him.

Schwarzkopf had a ringside seat to Poppy's bullshit scam, he knows how they work things. He did Junior a fine turn -- "Whoa, old hardbitten Norm came around? There's gotta be something to this."

Fuck him twice, he's a tool. If he hates Clark, then Clark's stock is soaring in my book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-03 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #29
49. I do recall Norman taking the sensible route, coalition. etc.
and I for one welcomed his opinion. Yes, "the fat bastard turned on a dime".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CMT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
16. Shelton said the same but
but I don't trust their motives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
17. I think the General was asked about this in one of the debates?
The Judy Woodruff debate, I think? I think he stepped on some toes and they took that as somehow not fit for today's military? I haven't heard anything else that would make me think negatively toward the General.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
19. Reflects worse on Schwartskopf jthan Clark
The New York BooK Review recently carried an article,
"Waiting for the General in which E. Drew very competent author and journalist debunks this smear campaign by the Pentagon. In the article Senator McCain was quoted as saying If people are going to make this acusations they should have the character to explain I say What about Schwarskopf's integrity. Is he just repeating a slur by
Hugh Shelton. The bottom line "Pentagon Politics and professional jealousy. Clark reived Medals as he was discharged. I do not think this would happen if he had flawed character.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snellius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
21. He said he didn't even know Clark
He just repeated Shelton's nasty characterization and said "that's good enough for me." As the flunky flown into battle in Florida, who declared Al Gore unfit to be commander in chief because his attorney questioned illegal votes, Old Norm is not exactly an unbiased judge of character.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Norm is a sack of shite
He was obese and a blowhard who was handy to use for briefings in Gulf War I. Integrity? If he had any he would've trimmed down and worn the uniform right - instead he was a blowhard, overtly political, and an embarassment to all hardworking, non-media creation soldiers everywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
23. What an ass
Shame Norman doesn't have a political career of his own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
25. Who gives a rat's ass what that chunky asshole says about Clark?
I don't like him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
26. barf
he makes my skin crawl -- repuke clone -- military industrial whore -- yuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
28. From the guy that got suckered into leaving Saddam his helicopters
so he could annihilate the Kurds after Poppy abandoned them..SWEEEET!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
30. He said that she said that they said that we said that he said.....
That's the story folks.....

I wrote to Bill Moyers to air a program on NOW to clear this shit up.
He would be an excellent venue for it.

If you want to make your voice count, help out and write him as well:
http://www.pbs.org/now/feedback.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nailzberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
31. How about a gentlemanly duel between the two?
American politics hasn't had a good duel in a while.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
33. Hey, I may not be in the Clark Camp
but I can smell bullshit when I see it.

Norman got a call from Bush* Sr. and went out and spewed what he was told to spew.

F*ck him, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. Thanks...Well Said.
When people say Bullshit about Dean I step in....thanks for the help.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
34. It was a nasty, cowardly attack, no facts, just spiteful, petty gossip .
Norman should be embarrassed. This should be spun around and hurled right back at them. This isn't politics, it's more like 8th grade girls trying to shut someone out of the Friday night dance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
37. Ol' Normie oughta know
being such a Bushie. hahahaha!! A schill like him whining about anybody's character is absurd. It also makes me think quite the opposite is true. Rethugs always project onto the clearest screen they can find.

What an asshole.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leetrisck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
40. As Clark has said before, if you want
to know what Shelton (& now Swartskoph??) mean, you'll have to ask them. Think I'll just talk to Shaliskavili???sp He seems to have a pretty high opinion of Clark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
42. The journalists who fail to ask him for specific incidents
are as bad as he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-03 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
43. Screw that fat pig.
Typical right wing crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tlb Donating Member (611 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-03 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
44. I think there is a shoe waiting the right moment to drop on Clark.
We'll see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-03 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
45. Stormin' Norman
Oh wasn't he the brave soldier who commanded the farcical war against Grenada; the war that blew up the mental institution on the hill, also acomplished using travel agency promotional maps and had to revert to using his wifes telephone credit card to contact the boys at the Pentagon? This was Ronnie's well-thought-out, done-in-haste, unneeded-War to rescue medical students who were in absolutely no danger. Killed quite a few collateral Grenadans without an apology. The landing field supposedly being built to make war on the US was being built for anticipating an influx of tourists to pump up the economy. I saw an advertisement in a travel mag a week or so after the assault encouraging travelers to visit the island with great airport accomodations for inflights. The invaders proudly displayed a sad cache of used flea market arms enough to outfit a few tourista skeet shooters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-03 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
46. Does Schwartzkopf have a web page or an email addy?
Time to send him my own thoughts. Perhaps he's got a publisher?

How unamerican and without balls. To point out one negative comment and ride it. Norman should be totally ashamed. When I saw it, I yelled at the tv screen I was so angry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donna Zen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-03 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
47. The preface
Schwartz...also begins by saying Clark never served with him and that basically he doesn't know him. Notice that they haven't dragged Shelton out. Why? Maybe because he has no answer.

This really pisses me off. If Clark were running as a repub, they'd be dancing in the streets and shouting about his brilliance.

Yes, Kosovo in shambles would have given them the Northern front they were dreaming about.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
funkyflathead Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-03 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
48. So do will still know why Clark was relieved of NATO command?
Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-03 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #48
50. Pentagon politics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-03 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #48
51. Check grannylib's post #11
showing link to site that might help show why Clark was relieved of his NATO post. Looks like Pentagon politics was the reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-03 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #48
54. I think that's Schumer on the left...
but who is that on right in the photo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-03 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
52. No, Bush has an R behind his name
That makes his actions acceptable. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
incapsulated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-03 01:36 AM
Response to Original message
53. So Norman's on the payroll now, eh?
Got his marching orders.

:puke:

Well, we can expect more of this and will have to survive. They are terrified of Clark and the more popular he gets, the harder they are going to hit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-03 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
55. Schwartzkopf is being a good little soldier for the BFEE.
End of story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC