Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

An Algorithm For Determining The Winner Of The 2004 Election

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Don_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-03 08:05 PM
Original message
An Algorithm For Determining The Winner Of The 2004 Election
It covers every Presidential election through 2000. The past selection looked like it was off, but it predicts that Dean/Clark or Dean/Rockefeller could easily slam Dimbo into the 1700's where he belongs.

Link: http://members.bellatlantic.net/%7Evze3fs8i/air/Elections.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
paradisiac Donating Member (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-03 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. is it open source
Edited on Sat Nov-08-03 08:23 PM by paradisiac
I'd like to look at the algorithm. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-03 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is there talk of Dean/Rockefeller?
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JailBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-03 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. AL GOREithm???
ALGORithms versus BUSHisms. Cool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darranar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-03 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. One problem...
Gore won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-03 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Exactly.
Clearly more people around the country AND in Floria voted for Al Gore. If not for the ballot mess in FL and intervention by the Whore Court, Gore would be in the White House. So their Al-Gore-ythm should have shown Gore the winner to be taken seriously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-03 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Okay, let's say SCOTUS had allowed the recounts to continue
Edited on Sat Nov-08-03 08:45 PM by elperromagico
The FL legislature was prepared for that eventuality; they were ready to appoint their own slate of electors regardless of the outcome.

The cards were stacked against Gore in Florida; Jeb had assured Dubya that FL would go Republican, and he was prepared to do anything to achieve that result.

One of the most important things we must insure in '04 is that the election does not hinge on Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democrats unite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-03 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Well it's going to so don't hold your breath...
I as a Floridian will do what ever it takes to stop a 2000 fiasco from happening again, but it will take a concerted effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-03 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Not if the Dem candidate
wins over 270 electoral votes in other states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-03 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. This formula sucks
The number generated does not give an accurate indication of the degree of victory or whether this predicted win factor refers to the popular vote or the electoral vote. Please note the formula if viewed in a non-binary way almost breaks down in 1960,1964,1976,1980,1988 and 2000.

The factors I feel determine electability in 2004 are as follows

(A)incumbancy
(B)appearance
(C)balanced ticket a.k.a southern strategy
(D)prior office
(E)anger factor
(F)politcal leaning
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-03 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. You may be right
but some of the factors you list are entirely subjective. It's very hard to judge appearance or anger mathematically/scientifically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC