Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I use to like Dean

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
aeon flux Donating Member (333 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:19 PM
Original message
I use to like Dean

There was a time when i would have voted for him in a heartbeat. But he shows his true colors by voting to keep funding the bogus war. His vote was a terrible miscalculation that will come back to haunt him.

Dean reveals his true colors as a Repug-Lite. Don't be fooled. He is a PNAC-enabler. I have lost all resepct for the man. Kudos to Kerry and Edwards for sticking to their guns by voting NO to the $87b.

Let's face it, Dean has proven himself to be a PNAC-enabler. Fool me once, shame on YOU, fool me twice, shame on DEAN.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
onebigbadwulf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. what vote are you talking about?
Dean and Kucinich were the biggest anti-war people out there. The only reason Dean thinks it necessary to stay now is to prevent genocide and/or saddam coming back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. ???? He can't vote to fund the war
What are you talking about? Dean isn't even in public office, nor has ever been in office in DC. Weird post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. HUH?
Dean IS NOT in Congress and DID NOT vote to fund the "bogus war"......you ARE clearly out of your element on here....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xJlM Donating Member (955 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Hmmmm...
According to the information here http://www.ourfuture.org/docUploads/dean_062303_131529.pdf he voted against the war resolution. Or at least according to the words out of his mouth. Reality may be a different story, but that doesn't much seem to matter to Dr. Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #13
35. I can't believe my lying eyes!
Edited on Sun Nov-09-03 05:52 PM by Tinoire
I want a foreign policy that is consistent with American values. I find it hard to believe that I'm the only major candidate running, who's in reasonably good shape in the polls, who voted “No” on the Iraq Resolution.

http://www.ourfuture.org/docUploads/dean_062303_131529.pdf

Dated June 5

That's pretty bad. Dean voted "NO"? In what alternate reality? Really, really bad when you factor in the lie against Kucinich there...

This is indeed a strange statement.

Another mis-speak. Dean is going to have to be careful because in the information age, these mis-speaks have legs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. I am not bashing here but Ive seen people claim this was a mistake
That is no gaffe. Anyways I still support Kucinich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. Um...
I'm not sure what you mean by he voted for the $87 billion and I don't know why you praise Kerry and Edwards for "sticking to their guns". The voted for the IWR out of political motivation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aeon flux Donating Member (333 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. Dean said he would have voted for the funding
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I didnt hear that, I thought he said he would have if Bush took back the
taxcut, even if Bush did I still would have said no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. In one of the debates...
he said he would only support the $87B funding if taxes were rolled back to pay for it. Kind a strange way to say your for balanced budgets though?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. shrug
I heard that too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Where?
Cite it please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. here
Edited on Sun Nov-09-03 05:28 PM by party_line
on edit- Zynx this is a response to the poster you were addressing and not you- my error :(


Statement by Governor Dean on the $87 billion supplemental appropriation

NEW YORK--Democratic presidential candidate Governor Howard Dean, M.D.,
issued the following statement this morning:

"Just over a year ago, Congress gave President Bush a blank check to
start a pre-emptive war without demanding answers to the tough
questions. Many of us said that we should have never started this war.

"From Vermont I could see that the President did not make the case for
war. There was no credible evidence that Iraq posed an imminent threat
or had a nuclear program. With Congressional approval, the President
rushed these troops to war and now he and the Congress are rushing to
approve another blank check.

"Let me be clear, I strongly support our troops and hope, with all
Americans, for their safe return home. And the responsible action for
our troops is to demand that the President immediately submit a new plan
for supporting our troops and rebuilding Iraq. The results of the last
hastily-made Iraq policy decision are all too evident today. Congress
owes it to our troops, the American people and the people in Iraq to
make the right decision this time.

"I would oppose President Bush's latest request for a blank check unless
the President submits a new plan that is paid for out of the tax cut.
The new plan must give our troops what they need and bring them home
safely, share this burden with other nations, ensure the stabilization
and rebuilding of Iraq, and make sure that the billions of dollars we
are spending are not wasted and used to pay off big corporations.
Congress must demand that the President submit this new plan
immediately.


"Too many in my party, like Senators Kerry, Edwards and Lieberman, and
Congressman Gephardt allowed the President to get us into this misguided
war. It is clear General Clark also supported the war at this time. The
right choice would have been voting 'no' last fall; voting 'no' now
cannot erase that poor decision. Trying to have it both ways
demonstrates neither strong leadership nor good judgment."

http://www.deanforamerica.com/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=9936
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. His position is different than just plain out supporting the $87 billion.
"Congress must demand that the President submit this new plan
immediately."

This part in particular.

As for Edwards and Kerry, their vote was shameless. Vote for the war when it is popular and then vote against the funding for the troops that are there because of the war resolution you voted for. Disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I know
My post should have been addressed to who you had responded to- sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. That's okay.
My mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SahaleArm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. I think he was trying...
Edited on Sun Nov-09-03 05:32 PM by SahaleArm
a little too hard to play the balanced budget angle. It sounds like he's saying yes to the $87B funding but paid for by repealing taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
31. thanks
Thanks. The impression I got from a debate was that he would vote for it unconditionally, but based on the press-release he would demand that it be part of a balanced budget and have accountability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
21. Not as such- see post 12
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
6. huh?
Dean is a congressman? I never heard. Anyways I still support the only candiate who voted no to IWR and the money, thank you Dennis Kucinich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. Kerry and Edwards voted FOR the war
What guns did they get stuck to?

And Dean DID say no on 87 billion unless certain conditions were met.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. Did he?
Prove it or at least tell me how the governor of Vermont gets to vote on a bill that's before the congress of the united states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. FORMER Governor of Vermont.
;) It makes it even harder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
15. Huh?
Dean isn't in Congress. How could he vote for anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
16. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Jackhammer Jesus Donating Member (415 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. I wouldn't be so quick to pull the Freep Alarm
considering I often seen DU regulars accuse other candidates of being PNAC/RNCers for equally false reasons.

I tend to write it off as misinformation and/or gullibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. This place is crawling with them
Disruption reigns supreme
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aeon flux Donating Member (333 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
25. No links

I'm going by what Dean said during the debate hosted in the Fox theater. Along the lines of "I wouldn't vote against the $87 billion that would keep and supply the troops in Iraq."

Not an exact quote but very similar, in response to a question by an incredulous Kucinich as to why Dean said he would have voted for the $87 b package.

That indicates to me that once in office, Dean would follow in the footsteps of the PNACers. Looks to me like he's trying to pull another Nixon-style switch and bait.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Read. It does you some good in life,
"I would oppose President Bush's latest request for a blank check unless
the President submits a new plan that is paid for out of the tax cut.
The new plan must give our troops what they need and bring them home
safely, share this burden with other nations, ensure the stabilization
and rebuilding of Iraq, and make sure that the billions of dollars we
are spending are not wasted and used to pay off big corporations.
Congress must demand that the President submit this new plan
immediately."

Refer to post 12 if you need to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Thank you for posting this...out
of the mud comes clarity!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
26. well....we've provided information to "correct" your misinformation...
just look at post #12....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
28.  So why don't you keep your criticizm of Dean to yourself and
tell us about the candidate you want and why? I might be more inclined to listen to someone who praises a candidate he likes rather than trash the one I like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
30. Dean didn't vote to fund anything to do with Iraq.
He's not a member of Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
32. Too Bad You Never Liked English
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
33. LOL! Dean had no vote. I believe you have him...
confused with one/some of the other candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. I think he has him confused with Trent Lott.
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
37. Me thinks
you are talking about the wrong person?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skinner ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-09-03 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
38. I'm locking this.
It's inflammatory.

Skinner
DU Admin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC