Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chomsky & Zinn discuss imperialist propaganda in LOTR "Two Towers"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-03 03:10 PM
Original message
Chomsky & Zinn discuss imperialist propaganda in LOTR "Two Towers"
Chomsky: The film opens with Galadriel speaking. "The world has changed," she tells us, "I can feel it in the water." She's actually stealing a line from the non-human Treebeard. He says this to Merry and Pippin in The Two Towers, the novel. Already we can see who is going to be privileged by this narrative and who is not.

Zinn: Of course. "The world has changed." I would argue that the main thing one learns when one watches this film is that the world hasn't changed. Not at all.

Chomsky: We should examine carefully what's being established here in the prologue. For one, the point is clearly made that the "master ring," the so-called "one ring to rule them all," is actually a rather elaborate justification for preemptive war on Mordor.

Zinn: I think that's correct. Tolkien makes no attempt to hide the fact that rings are wielded by every other ethnic enclave in Middle Earth. The Dwarves have seven rings, the Elves have three. The race of Man has nine rings, for God's sake. There are at least 19 rings floating around out there in Middle Earth, and yet Sauron's ring is supposedly so terrible that no one can be allowed to wield it. Why?

Chomsky: Notice too that the "war" being waged here is, evidently, in the land of Mordor itself at the very base of Mount Doom. These terrible armies of Sauron, these dreadful demonized Orcs, have not proved very successful at conquering the neighboring realms if that is even what Sauron was seeking to do. It seems fairly far-fetched.

Zinn: And observe the map device here how the map is itself completely Gondor-centric. Rohan and Gondor are treated as though they are the literal center of Middle Earth. Obviously this is because they have men living there. What of places such as Anfalas and Forlindon or Near Harad? One never really hears anything about places like that. And this so-called map casually reveals other places the Lost Realm, the Northern Waste (lost to whom? wasted how? I ask) but tells us nothing about them. It is as though the people who live in these places are despicable, and unworthy of mention. Who is producing this tale? What is their agenda? What are their interests and how are those interests being served by this portrayal? Questions we need to ask repeatedly.

Chomsky: And here comes Bilbo Baggins. Now, this is, to my mind, where the story begins to reveal its deeper truths. In the books we learn that Saruman was spying on Gandalf for years. And he wondered why Gandalf was traveling so incessantly to the Shire. As Tolkien later establishes, the Shire's surfeit of pipe-weed is one of the major reasons for Gandalf's continued visits.

Zinn: You view the conflict as being primarily about pipe-weed, do you not?

Chomsky: Well, what we see here, in Hobbiton, farmers tilling crops. The thing to remember is that the crop they are tilling is, in fact, pipe-weed, an addictive drug transported and sold throughout Middle Earth for great profit.

Zinn: This is absolutely established in the books. Pipe-weed is something all the Hobbits abuse. Gandalf is smoking it constantly. You are correct when you point out that Middle Earth depends on pipe-weed in some crucial sense, but I think you may be overstating its importance. Clearly the war is not based only on the Shire's pipe-weed. Rohan and Gondor's unceasing hunger for war is a larger culprit, I would say.

Chomsky: But without the pipe-weed, Middle Earth would fall apart. Saruman is trying to break up Gandalf's pipe-weed ring. He's trying to divert it.

Zinn: Well, you know, it would be manifestly difficult to believe in magic rings unless everyone was high on pipe-weed. So it is in Gandalf's interest to keep Middle Earth hooked.

Chomsky: How do you think these wizards build gigantic towers and mighty fortresses? Where do they get the money? Keep in mind that I do not especially regard anyone, Saruman included, as an agent for progressivism. But obviously the pipe-weed operation that exists is the dominant influence in Middle Earth. It's not some ludicrous magical ring.

Zinn: You've mentioned in the past the various flavors of pipe-weed that Hobbits have cultivated: Gold Leaf, Old Toby, etc.
Chomsky: Nothing better illustrates the sophistication of the smuggling ring than the fact that there are different brand names associated with the pipe-weed. Ah, here we have Gandalf smoking a pipe in his wagon the first of many clues that link us to the hidden undercurrents of power.

Zinn: Gandalf is deeply implicated. That's true. And of course the ring lore begins with him. He's the one who leaks this news of the supposed evil ring.

Chomsky: Now here, just before Bilbo's eleventy-first birthday party, we can see some of the symptoms of addiction. We are supposed to attribute Bilbo's tiredness, his sensation of feeling like too little butter spread out on a piece of bread, to this magical ring he supposedly has. It's clear something else may be at work, here.

Zinn: And soon Gandalf is delighting the Hobbits with his magic. Sauron's magic is somehow terrible but Gandalf's, you'll notice, is wonderful.
Chomsky: And note how Gandalf's magic is based on gunpowder, on explosions.

Zinn: Right.

Chomsky: And it is interesting, too, that Gandalf's so-called magic is technological, and yet somehow technology seems to be what condemns Saruman's enterprises, as well as those of the Orcs.

Zinn: Exactly.

Chomsky: But we will address that later. Here we have Pippin and Merry stealing a bunch of fireworks and setting them off. This might be closer to the true heart of the Hobbits.

Zinn: You mean the Hobbits' natural inclination?

Chomsky: I think the Hobbits are criminals, essentially.

Zinn: It also seems incredibly irresponsible for Gandalf to have a firework that powerful just sitting in the back of his wagon.

Chomsky: More of his smoke and mirrors, yes? Gandalf conjures the dragon Smaug to scare the people.

Zinn: One can always delight the little people with explosions.

Chomsky: As long as they're blowing up somewhere else. Now we come to Bilbo's disappearance. Again, we have to question the validity of the ring, and the magic powers attributed to it. Did Bilbo Baggins really disappear at his party, or is this some kind of mass hallucination attributable to a group of intoxicated Hobbits? When forced to consider so-called magic compared to the hallucinatory properties of a known narcotic, Occam's Razor would indicate the latter as a far more plausible explanation.

Zinn: I also think it is a spectacular display of bad manners to disappear at your own birthday party. And here, for the first time, Gandalf speaks to Bilbo about magic rings. Still, it is never clearly established why this one ring is so powerful. Everything used to justify that belief is legendary.

Chomsky: Gandalf is clearly wondering if it's time to invoke his plan for the supposed revelation concerning the secret magic ring. Why now? Well, I think it's because the people in Mordor the Orcs, I'm speaking of are starting to obtain some power, are starting to ask a little bit more from Middle Earth than Middle Earth has ever seen fit to give to them. And I don't think it's unreasonable for them to expect something back from Middle Earth. Of course, if that happened, the entire economy would be disrupted.

Zinn: The pipe-weed-based economy.

Chomsky: And, as you pointed out earlier, the military-industrial-complex that exists in Gondor. This constant state of alertness. This constant state of fear. And here Gandalf reveals his true nature.

Zinn: Indeed. Gandalf darkens the room and yells at poor Bilbo for rightfully accusing him of trying to steal his ring. It is abundantly obvious that Gandalf wants to steal the ring. But if he is caught with the ring himself, his pretext will dissolve. He needs to throw as much plausible deniability into his scheme as possible, which is why, later, he has Frodo carry the ring for him.

Chomsky: Gandalf knows the ring is powerless. It's interesting that he attaches so much importance to it and yet will not pick it up himself. This is because he knows that merely possessing the worthless ring will not help his cause. It's important to keep others thinking that it can. If Gandalf held the ring, he might be asked to do something with it. But its magic is nonexistent.

Zinn: Well, power needs to have its proxies. That way the damage is always deniable. As long as the Hobbits have the ring, no one will ever question the plot Gandalf has hatched. So here is the big scary ring, and all that happens when Gandalf moves to touch it is that he sees a big flaming eye. And notice it is different kind of eye not like our eye.

Chomsky: Almost a cat-like eye.

Zinn: It's on fire. Somehow being an on-fire eye is this terrible thing in the minds of those in Middle Earth. I think this is a way of telling others in Middle Earth to be ashamed of their eyes. And of course you see the Orcs' eyes are all messed up, too. They're this terrible color. And what does Gandalf tell Frodo about the ring? "Keep it secret. Keep it safe."

Chomsky: "Let's leave the most powerful object in all of Middle Earth with a weak little Hobbit, a race known for its chattering and intoxication, and tell him to keep it a secret."

Zinn: Right. And here we receive our first glimpse of the supposedly dreadful Mordor, which actually looks like a fairly functioning place.

Chomsky: This type of city is most likely the best the Orcs can do if all they have are cliffs to grow on. It's very impressive, in that sense.

Zinn: Especially considering the economic sanctions no doubt faced by Mordor. They must be dreadful. We see now that the Black Riders have been released, and they're going after Frodo. The Black Riders. Of course they're black. Everything evil is always black. And later Gandalf the Grey becomes Gandalf the White. Have you noticed that?

Chomsky: The most simplistic color symbolism.

Zinn: And the writing on the ring, we learn here, is Orcish the so-called "black speech." Orcish is evidently some spoliation of the language spoken in Rohan. This is what Tolkien says.

Chomsky: From what I understand, Orcish is a patois that the Orcs developed during their enslavement by Rohan, before they rebelled and left.

Zinn: Well, supposedly the Orcs were first bred by "the dark power of the north in the elder days." Tolkien says that "Orc" comes from the Mannish word tark, which means "man of Gondor."

Chomsky: Shameless really.

Zinn: Gandalf mentions the evil stirring in Mordor. That's all he has to say. "It's evil." He doesn't elaborate on what's going on in Mordor, what the people are going through. They're evil because they're there.

Chomsky: I think the fact that we never actually see the enemy is quite damning. Then again, Gandalf is the greatest storyteller of all. He weaves the tales that strand Middle Earth in this state of perpetual conflict.

Zinn: He is celebrated on one hand as a great statesman, a wise man, and viewed by the people who understand the role that he actually plays as a dangerous lunatic and a war criminal. And you will notice that Gandalf's war pitch hits its highest note when the Black Riders arrive in Hobbiton. I don't think that's a coincidence.

Chomsky: This is the Triumph of the Will.

Zinn: And now Frodo and Sam are joined by Merry and Pippin, as they finally escape the Shire. They're being chased by the Black Riders. Again, if these Black Riders are so fearsome, and they can smell the ring so lividly, why don't they ever seem able to find the Hobbits when they're standing right next to them?

Chomsky: Well, they're on horseback.

Zinn: Right.

Chomsky: This episode in Bree should cause us to ask, too, how much Frodo knows about the conspiracy. He seems to be piecing it together a little bit. I think at first he's an unwitting participant, fooled by Gandalf's propaganda.

Zinn: I'm much more suspicious of Frodo than you are. I've always viewed him as one of the most malevolent actors in this drama, precisely because of how he abets people like Gandalf. He uses a fake name, Mr. Underhill, just as Gandalf goes by several names: Mithrandir, the Grey Pilgrim, the White Rider. Strider is also Aragorn, is also Estel, is also Elessar, is also Dunadan. He has all these identities.

Chomsky: We call those aliases today.

Zinn: But is Sauron ever anything but Sauron? Is Saruman ever anything but Saruman?

Chomsky: And now, with Frodo in the midst of a hallucinogenic, paranoid state, we meet Strider.

Zinn: Note that the first thing he starts talking about is the ring. "That is no trinket you carry." A very telling irony, that. It is the kind of irony that Shakespeare would use. It is something Iago might say. And did you hear that? "Sauron the Deceiver." That is what Strider, the ranger with multiple names, calls Sauron. A ranger. I believe today we call them serial killers.

Chomsky: Or drug smugglers.

Zinn: And notice how Strider characterizes the Black Riders. "Neither living nor dead." Why, that's a really useful enemy to have.

Chomsky: Yes. In this way you can never verify their existence, and yet they're horribly terrifying. We should not overlook the fact that Middle Earth is in a cold war at this moment, locked in perpetual conflict. Strider's rhetoric serves to keep fear alive.

Zinn: You've spoken to me before about Mordor's lack of access to the mineral wealth that the Dwarves control.

Chomsky: If we're going to get into the socio-economic reasons why certain structures develop in certain cultures it's mainly geographical. We have Orcs in Mordor trapped, with no mineral resources hemmed in by the Ash Mountains, where the "free peoples" of Middle Earth can put a city, like Osgiliath, and effectively keep the border closed.

Zinn: Don't forget the Black Gate. The Black Gate, which, as Tolkien points out, was built by Gondor. And now we jump to the Orcs chopping down the trees in Isengard.

Chomsky: A terrible thing the Orcs do here, isn't it? They destroy nature. But again, what have we seen, time and time again?

Zinn: The Orcs have no resources. They're desperate.

Chomsky: Desperate people driven to do desperate things.

Zinn: Desperate to compete with the economic powerhouses of Rohan and Gondor.

Chomsky: Who really knows their motive? Maybe this is a means to an end. And while that might not be the best philosophy in the world, it makes the race of Man in no way superior. They're going to great lengths to hold onto their power. Two cultures locked in conflict over power, with one culture clearly suffering a great deal. I think sharing power and resources would have been the wisest approach, but Rohan and Gondor have shown no interest in doing so. Sometimes, revolution must be.

Zinn: Mistakes are often ...

Chomsky: Blood must be shed. I forget what Thomas Jefferson ...

Zinn: He said that blood was the ...

Chomsky: The blood of tyrants ...

Zinn: The blood of tyrants.

Chomsky: ... waters the tree of ...

Zinn: ... revolution.

Chomsky: ... freedom. Or revolution. Something like that.

Zinn: I think that's actually very, very close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-03 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. This went around a few months ago
It was satire -- hopefully obviously satire...(at least outside of the US it was obvious)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrBB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-03 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I always think it's a little odd to relate the LOTR film to 9/11
Since it was filmed and completed before the attack occured.

Some analyses are satirical without even meaning to be. But this one's pretty clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-03 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Well in the Lounge
they were busy discussing threesomes and spanking, so I figured this would be more appropriate here. Besdies, the satire is *spot on*.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-03 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bloody long, but hilarious.
I think my eyes hurt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-03 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. The novels weren't read very carefully when this satire was made (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-03 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. OK, here is my reply to the discussion.
Edited on Tue Nov-11-03 03:24 PM by DarkPhenyx
GIVE ME A FUCKING BREAK!

I swaer there are days I want to smack absolutely everyone. I like Chomsky most of the time but Jesus!

<on edit>

Oh! Satire. Um... :crazy:

OK, I fell for it. Time for my spanking I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-03 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It is a joke, y'know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-03 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. nooooooooooooooooooooo, I missed that.
*blush* Fell right into the trap so to speak.

I blame it on the rather intense discussion I was having on another thread. Was in "kill" mode when I read this. yeah, that's it. That's my excuse. Um...yeah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-03 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. S'alright, we've all done it. I do it on an hourly basis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-03 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. Bend over...
and take it like a man. :-)

:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Classic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-03 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. I love it!
The world is portrayed as Gondor-centric! HA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-03 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
11. The Ring Is A Metaphor For Nuclear Arms
Did anyone else get a sense of this? How the ring is the awesome force of power, but it will corrupt and destory whoever wields it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-03 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
30. Nope
LOTR was primarily written before the advent of nuclear weapons (the first draft took 14 years to write, and was finished in 1947).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaptainClark23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-03 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. Thanks, whocounts
Thats the funniest fecking thing I've seen in a long time.

Who wrote it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-03 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. no idea, but it's been floating around for a while
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Il_Coniglietto Donating Member (217 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-03 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. Very cute
At first, I thought they'd gone a bit bonkers until it struck me that there was no way they were being serious about this. I'm a bit gullible *shrugs*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Classic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-03 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. Here's page 2:
http://www.mcsweeneys.net/2003/04/23fellowship.html

U N U S E D
A U D I O C O M M E N T A R Y
B Y H O W A R D Z I N N
A N D N O A M C H O M S K Y ,
R E C O R D E D
S U M M E R 2 0 0 2 ,
F O R T H E F E L L O W S H I P
O F T H E R I N G
( P L A T I N U M S E R I E S
E X T E N D E D E D I T I O N ) D V D ,
P A R T T W O .

BY JEFF ALEXANDER AND TOM BISSELL

- - - -



- - - -

Chomsky: One of the problems with the perspective offered
by the Man-Elf coalition is that you have to try so hard to
get at the truth of the conflict, at what is really going on; it's
so obscured by their propaganda and relentless militarism. I
mean, here we have swords being distributed to the Hobbits
by Strider so they can protect themselves against these
"evil creatures." Now, in this case, it's probably warranted,
though the "evil creatures" are looking for the ring in their
own individual self-interest. They're behaving in a purely
rational way.

Zinn: The Nazgul have been ordered to get the ring. So,
that's what they're doing.

Chomsky: There are conflicts in rationality as well.
Sometimes valid rationality is forced into conflict because of
the structures of culture. But working through those cultural
differences is where the peace lies. It doesn't lie in
destroying some magical ring. This takes me back to the
media's involvement in all this, and the way the media is
being controlled by Gandalf, such as when he covers
Saruman's palantir in Orthanc. This is the stone that allows
one to see, and thus communicate with, different cultures.

Zinn: Right. "What does the eye command, my lord?" This is
what the Orcs ask Saruman. In other words, what does the
palantir say? Clearly the Orcs know a lot more about the
people of Rohan and Gondor than the people of Rohan and
Gondor have ever cared to know about them. They're
curious beings.

Chomsky: Naturally, it's in Rohan/Gondor's interest to keep
the Orcs obscured, to make everything as restricted and
dehumanizing as possible. It's always the first step toward
genocide. And is this - is there anything less than genocide
being advocated in this film?

Zinn: I don't think so.

Chomsky: Is there any kind of idea that men should live in
peace with the Orcs?

Zinn: Think of the scenes in the prologue with all the arrows
hitting these thousands of Orcs. We're supposed to think
that this is a good thing.

Chomsky: I think this is a tragedy, this story. Because it's
about two cultures. And poor leadership. It's a human
tragedy, and an Orcish tragedy.

Zinn: A perfect example of what you're talking about is
right here, when Strider attacks the Black Riders, "saving"
Frodo from them.

Chomsky: Think of it from the Black Riders' perspective.
No doubt they arrived at Weathertop thinking, "Can we ask
a few questions? We'd like to talk to you."

Zinn: Now from here we jump to Isengard, post-ecological
atrocities. What I personally see here is... well, I see
industrialization, I see a very cooperative workforce, I see a
people who aren't terrorized, a people attempting to make
do with what they have.

Chomsky: Well, they're making weapons, which is sad. I
mean, it would be nice if they could make plowshares, but
unfortunately this isn't the time for plowshares in their
culture. But they're showing great ingenuity, and they're
showing cooperation, you're right about that.

Zinn: Actually it shows the Orcs smithing a lot of pieces of
metal. I don't think it's necessarily established that what
they're making is swords, is it? They could be farming
implements of some sort. They're definitely
unusual-looking. But I have to ask you, what about the
genetic engineering that goes on with the Uruk-hai?

Chomsky: It's certainly a strange aspect of their culture, but
why should we be so condemning? I mean, this is the way
they reproduce. If it looks disgusting to us, well maybe we
should readjust what we regard as disgusting. I mean, is
that any more vile than pulling a baby out of a gaping, bloody
hole?

Zinn: And we go back to the Hobbits. After Frodo's been
stabbed, Strider and Sam immediately journey out in search
of another herb: kingsfoil, or athelas.

Chomsky: Aragorn is evidently into Research and
Development as well.

Zinn: He certainly seems knowledgeable of "herbs" and
"medicines."

Chomsky: And notice the way Arwen Evenstar greets
Strider: a knife to the throat. I think that's a very telling, very
interesting thing that happens over and over. Whenever
"friendly" people encounter one another, they're raising
swords, looking fearful and distrustful.

Zinn: Now we witness the Black Riders finally together -
all nine Riders - giving chase to Arwen and Frodo. When
we see the Orcs destroy their environment, it is this big
scandal. But Arwen is able to send a whole herd of watery
horses down a river, no doubt a very delicate ecosystem,
and probably completely demolish it, and no one says
anything about that.

Chomsky: The Elves, of course, always say that they are
the best custodians of nature. And there's a curious type of
nature-worship in their culture that allows them to claim,
by every implication, "Trees are more important than
people." They don't regard the Orcs as people. However,
Orcs are thinking, sentient, conscious beings with a culture
and a language. They feel pain. They express emotion.
They are constantly evolving, trying to better themselves.

Zinn: But here the Elvish culture is revealed to be very
elaborate, because, of course, they have better
architecture. But I vastly prefer the real grittiness one finds
in Mordor. Think of the suspiciously clean city of Rivendell.
You don't see any life going on there. No people at all.
There's hardly anyone in the streets. It should be said,
though, that, on occasion, the Orcs have been known to eat
one another.

Chomsky: That's cannibalism, sure, but maybe it's part of a
sacred ritual with them. Maybe it's an ancient part of their
culture. Who are we to judge? Still, I have problems with it,
I agree.

Zinn: So here we have another shot of Rivendell being
beautiful because it happens to be located in the mountains,
where the lighter people live. And we see here the two
primary players moving the action forward: an Elf and a
wizard. Elrond and Gandalf.

Chomsky: This is our first real glimpse into the power
structure of Middle Earth. It's basically two men who rule
their people, deciding what will happen - not asking anyone
what they think should happen. Gandalf, even more
disturbingly, does not even rule a people but rather rules
from his own personal whims and preferences.

Zinn: Isn't it implied that he's from Rohan?

Chomsky: Originally he's from over the sea. He is some
type of magic person, according to his own myth about
himself. He doesn't claim any land, instead acting as
custodian of all of their lands. Of course, I think he's a
classic dictator, pulling the strings. Can you detect how
outraged I am by this?

Zinn: Why do you suppose it is that the Elves don't want the
ring to stay in Rivendell? Isn't this obvious proof that the ring
is nothing but a device to be used against Mordor?

Chomsky: This is their justification for war. That's why
Boromir is so insightful when he says, basically, "Why don't
we use it? If this ring's so great, who don't we use the damn
thing?"

Zinn: And what happens to Boromir? The Orcs are tricked
into killing him. Thus silencing him.

Chomsky: I think this is an interesting scene - Aragorn in
Rivendell looking upon the Isildur mural - because it shows
how the militarization of their propaganda has fed their
cultural behaviors and religious beliefs.

Zinn: Isildur's broken sword, you mean?

Chomsky: The myth. I mean, look at this museum, this cult,
all based around a broken sword. They've developed a
religion so that people can be effectively marshaled into
battle. And Aragorn is a part of that. He's a king, performing
a ceremony for people to continue this senseless belief in
some kind of genetic superiority. It is rather like saying, "I
have the signet ring of the house of the tsar," or something.
Now I can rule.

Zinn: Well, I think this scene shows us what kind of person
Aragorn is - a loner, possibly a drug lord.

Chomsky: And then we get bathed in Aragorn-Arwen love
lore. And it's the most simplistic kind of propaganda. You've
got this beautiful woman who represents the Party,
represents the people of the Motherland, and you have the
hero. Develop a little love affair between them.

Zinn: A love affair between the putative hero and the
personified Motherland concept, you mean.

Chomsky: Right. The humans are all so entranced by the
Elves' completely mythological power. It's a spell that has
been cast upon them.

Zinn: I see the humans, embodied by Aragorn, as being
indicative of a sort of middle-class longing.

Chomsky: It keeps them striving. If you're a good enough
man, you can be an Elf.

Zinn: An Elf. As if that's the best thing to be.

Chomsky: Now, at the Council of Elrond, we have the
Middle Earth equivalent of a television broadcast. It's one
guy sitting in a tall chair and talking at twenty other people.
This is how information is spread in this culture. But, you
know, it doesn't have to be this way. Imagine that, right
now, you have the people in Gondor with a palantir, the
people in Rohan with a palantir, the people in the Woodland
Realm with a palantir. And everyone could be standing
around it, talking to one another, sharing a conference in
which the people have an equal interest and stake in what
decisions are made.

Zinn: Technology that Gandalf already knows is available.
But do we see a single Orc?

Chomsky: Oh, of course not. Of course not. Because
everyone here has a vested interest in keeping the Orcs
down.

Zinn: Boromir is the only one honest enough to talk about
what the real story is here.

Chomsky: Boromir's an interesting case. His culture is
threatened by the Orcs in a very real way. But he's also
seen that this occupation of Orc land is engendered by his
people's own aggressive policies. So he's like an
enlightened Israeli who looks at the situation and says, "If I
were in their situation, I would be just like them."

Zinn: Boromir here is talking about the eye, and how
horrible Mordor is, which reveals the basic limitations of his
cultural situation. Boromir embodies the prejudices of his
culture, but I too think he's an interestingly problematic
figure. He's really the only one who understands... my God.
Look at this. Keep in mind that these are supposed to be
Middle Earth's enlightened people at this Council, and
they're all fighting, they all hate one another.

Chomsky: It's just so complicated, the webs of
relationships.

Zinn: Now Frodo, son of Drogo, agrees to take the ring to
Mount Doom. Something tells me that no one in Mordor
calls it Mount Doom.

Chomsky: And everyone baits Frodo into this. "You are our
agent, going on a suicide mission. You have to do it for the
Motherland."

Zinn: So is Frodo the Mohammed Atta figure in this story?

Chomsky: He's a fanatical true believer. And crazy.
Obviously, totally insane.

Zinn: And listen to what Aragorn tells Frodo: "You have my
sword."

Chomsky: So militaristic.

Zinn: Notice that no one says, "You have my diplomatic
skills." I think the only real diplomat of Middle Earth is
Gollum. He's the only one who makes any meaningful,
cross-cultural exchange with any of these people. Being a
torture victim at the hand of the Orcs, and his attempted
strangulation of the Hobbits.

Chomsky: I think of Gollum as more of a deluded madman,
one more sinned against than sinned.

Zinn: There's room for argument. And, yet again, here we
see Bilbo ravaged from the effects of pipe-weed. It's been
flushed from his system in his idyll-cum-rehab in Rivendell.
And what does he give Frodo? He gives him his sword, of
course. Sting.

Chomsky: As if to say, "You know, when you've stabbed
enough people in the back like I have, you'll need this shirt
of mithril." Hobbits are bandits. They have this little veneer
of nobility around them, but they are nothing more than
demented little thieves.

Zinn: On the way to Moria, here, we should point out the
fear that men and Elves have of the Dwarves' culture. They
refuse to enter the mines of Moria.

Chomsky: There is something very funny lingering around
the edges of the whole Moria episode. Could it be that the
Dwarves living there were starting to get different ideas
about the Orcs? Were starting to talk to the Orcs, and
establish some means of cross-cultural communication?
Perhaps Gandalf and some of his Rohan friends went there
only to find a bunch of Dwarves and Orcs talking, maybe
forming an alliance or pact. And then Gandalf massacred all
of them, and pretended as though there was some huge
battle. This would explain why Gandalf can't lead them
back there. Genocide's been committed. He hasn't yet
weaved a good enough story to explain away the evidence.
He has to pretend that Moria is this scary place.

Zinn: So few kingdoms within Middle Earth are established
with any vividness. This goes some way toward proving
your point.

Chomsky: We're encouraged to think that no one but the
Fellowship's active participants are important, but then we
go into Moria, and we realize that this was once an
incredible, deeply multicultural place. There were some
Orcs who lived there, and who are still living there. So here
we are, walking into Moria, the scene of what was possibly
a great massacre at the hands of Gandalf. And of course,
the Fellowship walks in and they see the hundreds of
bodies. Don't think for a moment that Boromir is not
suspicious about all of this.

Zinn: Earlier, Boromir says, "We make for the Gap of
Rohan." If you're correct, what he is really saying is, "Let's
back out. I need to talk to some people."

Chomsky: "I need to tell them about what I have lately
discovered."

Zinn: Now, we see in Moria that the Dwarves had a fairly
sophisticated mithril mine here. Wouldn't you say the
Dwarves are the Jew-like figures of Middle Earth?

Chomsky: They are former slaves. The comparison is apt.

Zinn: They're good at doing things with their hands. This is
something Tolkien is very adamant about. They're useful,
but they're not very educated. Ah, and this is also where we
first see Gollum. I stick to my view of Gollum as a rebel
who transgresses boundaries. In many ways he is the
heroic, empathetic conscience of this story. He's the only
one who cares about bridging the gaps between these many
cultures.

Chomsky: You could be right. I think there's possibly
something very wise about Gollum. Obviously he's
well-traveled, he's a hermit.

Zinn: I think his sexuality is questionable, and that's why
he's viewed as this hateful, awful thing. Everyone always
talks about killing him.

Chomsky: Gandalf of course likes to have as many ghosts
around him as possible. He slyly encourages Frodo in this
belief that Gollum is some kind of horrible, corrupt thing. He
neglects to say, "You know, I tortured him just a couple of
weeks ago."

Zinn: Exactly.

Chomsky: Notice that Gandalf doesn't give anybody else
the supposed Dwarf book to read. Gandalf could be passing
it off as Balin's last words. We don't know what is actually
recorded in it, though. Very cunning. It could be agreement
drawn up between the Orcs and the Dwarves. It could quite
easily be that.

Zinn: It would explain why he kept it out of Gimli's hands.

Chomsky: Sure. "No, don't worry. I'll read it. Let me read
this to you guys."

Zinn: What I think this reveals is that the Dwarves have a
very beautiful, elegant, poetic way about them.

Chomsky: Except Gandalf could be making it all up.

Zinn: That's what I mean: this is much more of a
Gandalfian, flowery language. It's hard to imagine the
Dwarves writing that way.

Chomsky: And now the terrible Orcs invade Balin's tomb.
Let's be clear about a few things here. The Orcs are
fighting a war of self-defense against the invading
Fellowship. They basically busted in on the Orcs' place
here. It's fairly clear that the Orcs are hiding there because
if they go outside they have every reason to believe that
they will be massacred by Gandalf.

Zinn: The Orcs certainly don't seem to be very good
fighters, do they? If they're such a terrible, evil, warlike
culture -

Chomsky: They can't kill even one of these little Hobbits
who just received their swords only a few days ago. One
would think that if the Orcs were as bad as the corrupt
Man-Elf coalition says, they would be a lot better at
fighting. It lends credence to the farming hypothesis - that
they were trying to scrabble out a meager existence in the
land in Mordor.

Zinn: You can see too here that the way the Hobbits fight is
highly indicative of their culture: They jump on a wounded
foe and then stab him in the neck.

Chomsky: They're very morally ambiguous characters.
There's a nasty complacency about Hobbits. One would
think that they could, easily enough, find out about all of the
things that happen in the world - all of the consequences of
their pipe-weed-growing actions. And now Middle Earth's
power structure is revealing itself, and they're a part of it.
Still, they don't question it. Worse yet, they revel in it.

Zinn: My question is how hard would the mithril have to be
to able to stop the cave troll from piercing you with his
spear? And where does this stuff come from? How would
anybody find out about it? You'd think the creators would
keep it as secret as possible.

Chomsky: Possibly mithril once served the same function in
Middle Earth culture as pipe-weed does now. After all, you
have to keep creating new industries.

Zinn: Of course. The culture of consumption is founded
upon whatever the new thing happens to be. One day it's
mithril, the next day it's pipe-weed. Perhaps tomorrow it
will be kingsfoil?

Chomsky: Here again we have the Orcs running after the
Fellowship. The Orcs, apparently, are going to slaughter
them, and in my estimation they would be well within their
rights to do so. But do they? No, they do not. They stop.

Zinn: They stop.

Chomsky: And then they run away because the Balrog
comes out. Take note of the fact that the Orcs don't appear
to like the Balrog much themselves. They're scared of it.

Zinn: I'm not sure what role the Balrog really plays in this.

Chomsky: I think it just happened to be there, guarding its
own little part of the mine.

Zinn: And look at these Orcs! Supposedly so evil and
vicious, and yet they don't do anything. They even appear to
talk it over amongst themselves.

Chomsky: Look at it from their perspective: They've been
locked up in this cave. They're frightened, they know
they're not good fighters. They're just a bunch of farmers.

Zinn: As evidenced by their long, ungainly swords.

Chomsky: Perhaps they've been radicalized a bit. But I
doubt they are true evil-doers.

Zinn: Again, I'm not sure what role the Balrog plays.

Chomsky: I, too, am uncertain on that point.

Zinn: Here, very significantly, we have the Bridge of
Khazad-Dûm. You will notice that what is destroyed is a
bridge - another potential connector.

Chomsky: On a symbolic level, that is a very good point.

Zinn: All the borders in this film are constantly being
destroyed, or overrun, or eliminated, or sealed. It's all about
fear - fearing the other. Notice, too, that the Elf Legolas
jumps across the ruined bridge first.

Chomsky: They'll cross this bridge and the bridge will
collapse, and they'll never be able to communicate with the
Balrog again, or with the Orcs inside. In fact, they're sealing
off the Orcs from ever escaping. They're leaving the Orcs in
the cave with this big Balrog. Now, again, surely, among
these Moria Orcs were some Orc radicals - aggressive,
angry, militant radicals. We shouldn't understate that.

Zinn: Well, look how the Orcs grow up. What do you
expect?

Chomsky: I mean, what other options have they?

Zinn: I dare say that, were I an Orc, I might possibly be one
of those terrorist Orcs, shooting arrows at the Fellowship
myself.

Chomsky: Here comes the Balrog. Notice Gandalf's
unilateral action. "Quick, get away, I have to fight this thing
alone!"

Zinn: Once again you see a creature that's on fire being
demonized in this movie: the flaming eye, the flaming
Balrog. As though being on fire is this terrible affliction to
have.

Chomsky: As though they can help it if they're on fire.

Zinn: After Gandalf falls, you get another view of the
so-called terrorist Orcs. You know, the regrettable side of
the Orcs does occasionally come out. The violence. It
doesn't help their cause when these distinct, individual Orcs
take it upon themselves to lash out at the inequality of the
system. But notice that even these violent Orcs don't seem
happy. They're not pleased with themselves. It's a violence
borne of necessity.

Chomsky: Sure. They're trapped in a cycle of violence.

Zinn: And now we come to Galadriel's wood, Lothlorien.
The film - inexcusably, in my view - leaves out a lot of the
things that happen to Gimli in this sequence.

Chomsky: He's forced to wear a blindfold. He is not allowed
to see the Elves. This is the apartheid system the Fellowship
serves.

Zinn: And even here the Elves hold, you know, arrows to
his head. He's completely brutalized. But of course Gimli
falls in love with Galadriel, thus perpetuating the Dwarves'
self-hatred.

Chomsky: It's somewhat similar to the method the Elves
use to ensnare people like Aragorn - to affect their Elvish
self-esteem. They want to be worshipped. It seems as
though a peculiar kind of brainwashing occurs whenever
anyone is exposed to Elf culture.

Zinn: I mean, look at how the Elves greet people - with
arrows. Is that so different from the Orcs?

Chomsky: Right. And they're supposed to be
nature-worshippers. It's sort of sickening and very
bourgeois.

Zinn: And of course we should point out that Galadriel is
wearing a ring throughout this entire scene. She has a ring -
arguably the most powerful ring. Somehow she's trusted to
wield this power responsibly. This woman who reads
people's minds without asking them.

Chomsky: That's true. She's constantly invading other
people's thoughts. Though there is one thing you have to
say for the Elves. Women's rights. But of course, we learn
here that even if you cede women these rights they become
just as morally culpable as any man. And have you taken
proper note of Galadriel's farewell gesture, when the
Fellowship sets its boats down the Silverlode? It is some
sort of Sieg Heil gesture.

Zinn: It is vaguely reminiscent of the biomechanics of
National Socialism. You'll notice, too, how clearly the
Man-Elf coalition controls all the modes of transportation in
Middle Earth. We always see the Orcs running. But
Legolas, Gimli, and Aragorn - I mean, sometimes they are
riding horses. The Orcs have nothing like any of this. The
Orcs certainly don't canoe.

Chomsky: Well they don't have these wide, beautiful rivers
to canoe on. That's part of the deprivation of their natural
resources. And just as you say, here the Orcs are, running.
A bunch of farmers, holding their clumsy weapons.

Zinn: The white hand of Saruman on the heads of the
Uruk-hai. Of course, the hand in control is white. And good
lord, these giant statues on the Anduin River. The Sentinels
of Númenor. These huge, monolithic statues that have their
hands thrust forever up. I think I can intuit what these
sentinels are saying: "Stay away, Orcs."

Chomsky: "Keep out of our land."

Zinn: "Keep out of our land. Don't come in." It is little
wonder that the Orcs are so warlike and angry.

Chomsky: And of course the sentinels are holding swords.
More monolithic images of supposedly noble militarism.

Zinn: One suspects that Orc slaves probably build the
things. I imagine there's a lot of Orc labor that gets in
through Gondor and Rohan. They want to get out of
Mordor. There are simply not a lot of economic options for
them there.

Chomsky: Picture, for a moment, the average Orc's life.
Hunted, hated, sometimes murdered. I think Jared Diamond
would be an interesting person to write about the effects of
environment and geography on all this.

Zinn: On the Orcs?

Chomsky: On Orcish culture as a whole. Of course, one of
the interesting points in Diamond's work is that you have
hunter-gathering cultures, and you have farming cultures,
developed societies. And these developed societies, these
agricultural cultures, mobilize and create large armies, and
hunter-gathering cultures are not actually very effective at
mounting large armies.

Zinn: Right. Like the Orcs.

Chomsky: This simple bunch of farmers, hastily rallied
together against these well-armed, well-equipped Elves
and men.

Zinn: Here we see the Orcs facing Aragorn for the first
time. It's not very obvious what's happening here. The Orcs
appear rather skittish.

Chomsky: Well, some of these Orcs are charging. It is fairly
easy to imagine what they are feeling. No doubt they have
seen this ranger's work before. Aragorn has so many
names, it is all but certain that he has a few Orcish names as
well. Orc-killer, perhaps. Orc-slayer. Madman. Look at all
this casual slaughter.

Zinn: Clearly the Orcs have a hand in murdering Boromir,
but Aragorn's innocence is not established by a long shot. I
think he maneuvered Boromir into that position. To get him
out of the way. After all, Boromir had a very clear claim to
Aragorn's supposed kingship.

Chomsky: That is very possible.

Zinn: I have to ask, what does this story do for the
powerful? For one, it makes them feel very good about the
kind of things they've done to less powerful societies. The
way they exploit them and the way they invent these phony
pretexts to wage wars of aggression against less powerful
people. The powerful need to tell themselves these stories.

Chomsky: And yet, as in all stories of this type, hidden
within the story are the keys to unlocking the hidden modes
of power.

Zinn: The thing is, though, that even when the dominant
culture tells itself the story, the story cannot help but include
those telltale signifiers of power that surrender the true
nature of the story.

Chomsky: It is embedded, I would say, in the language of
the story itself. No matter how often the storytellers try to
obscure the truth, the truth will out. The truth will be
betrayed through the way the story gets told.

Zinn: Thankfully, the literature of oppression can never last
because the oppression is always so obvious. It's always
about the people who are suppressed, who keep getting
more and more aware of how they're suppressed. And
once they're aware of how suppressed they are, they can -

Chomsky: Right, they're able to -

Zinn: We've got to get our conspiracy straight.

Chomsky: Not necessarily. Think of Lee Harvey Oswald.

Zinn: A patsy. A CIA agent.

Chomsky: A cold-blooded, ruthless killer.

Zinn: Right.

Chomsky: He was a good shot. He was a bad shot.

Zinn: Right. Exactly.

Chomsky: But then, I don't really believe in conspiracy
theories about JFK.

Zinn: Neither do I.

Chomsky: So.

Zinn: Isn't that funny?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-03 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
17. this misses badly, imo
the person that wrote this seems to be doing a parody of literary deconstruction, which neither Chomsky and Zinn really do.

Chomsky does analysis of official propaganda, and Zinn does history from a sort of socialist perspective.

I don't have a special attachment to either of them, and I think they could be parodied pretty well, but this one is way off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-03 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. At the risk of taking advantage of my social priviledge
Edited on Tue Nov-11-03 03:54 PM by WhoCountsTheVotes
Laugh it's funny! :bounce: It's more a simple parody of Chomsky's speaking style and interview format imo. It would have been Barsamian but no one knows who he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-03 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Well, actually...
That piece was used by pro-war forces before the invasion to imply that Chomsky, Zinn, and the entire anti-war movement were Saddam Hussein apologists (ie., as they 'apologized' in the satire for Saruman).

So I don't find it that funny, to be honest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-03 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. anyone swayed by this as pro-war propaganda
wouldn't get it I don't think, if that's pro-war propaganda, or anti-anti-war propaganda, I don't think it worked too well.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-03 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. exactly
"Chomsky" calling Mordor a "fairly functioning state" and "the best the Orcs can do"?

Count me out of this laff riot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-03 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. yes, count me out
Because subtle or not so subtle jokes about iconoclastic leftist celebrities is no laughing matter.

Really, this is a serious question. Is the author of this propaganda laughing at us, or with us? Can we even ask that question from our position above our own cultural narrative?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-03 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. sorry, but I'm a stickler
One serious flaw is that there is no difference in this parody between the two voices. They're both generic leftist caricatures.

Regarding Chomsky's style, it doesn't resemble it in the least. Chomsky is very dry and technical and precise, and builds up a logical argument in a systematic way. This parody has him/them being meandering and pointless.

I'm less familiar with Zinn, but the same goes for him but to a lesser extent. He's not as dry as Chomsky, but he's also not a dippy parody of an undergrad studying Derrida.

This is all said with no rancor at all, just in the spirit of getting things right, or at least not totally wrong. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silverhair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-03 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
22. You should have posted this on April 1st. Funny. Pointed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enki23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-03 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. sure. pointed.
Edited on Tue Nov-11-03 04:31 PM by enki23
if the "point" is the author's target, then this bit would be the equivalent of a blind parkinson's patient trying to hit it at 100 yards with a squirt gun.

pointed. *snarf*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chovexani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-03 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
26. Nice try but
Sorry, not finding this particularly funny. Whoever wrote this doesn't have a strong enough grasp of Tolkien to pull it off.

I did get a good laugh out of the "Man-Elf coalition", mainly because it reminds me of an Aragorn/Legolas slash fic I wrote when I was 13. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoCountsTheVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-03 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. I say one must be ignorant of not only of Chomsky and Zinn, but Tolkien
or else to take them all way to seriously, to not find this funny. At least a tiny bit funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cat Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-03 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
28. I don't care whether the author is laughing at us or with us, I still
think it's funny. And besides- satire is *supposed* to sting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-03 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
29. An Excellent Piece, Mr. Votes
Thank you very much for the laugh. It is very well done, and takes a little while before certainty is reached the thing is satire....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bread_and_roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-11-03 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
31. I laughed out loud
and I confess to loving LOTR (despite its' racism and fuedalism), and when I refer to Noam Chomsky as "my hero" I do so with only a touch of irony. Zinn I have read but am not as familiar with. I respect the analytical competence of those who find too off-the-mark to be funny, but it was close enough for me to give me a good laugh. I wish someone would post a web-site for this - there are people I would like to share it with who are unfamiliar with this site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC