CSpan Thread 1 - Sen. Leahy WAS supposed to be on

[La_Serpiente]

I don't know what happened.

And now they have a Charles Hurt, a reporter from the Washington Times telling about the nominations. So far, he is fairly unbiased. (I retract that former statement: He's biased)

Here is the schedule for today:

ON WASHINGTON JOURNAL
Wednesday, November 12
7am - Newspaper Articles & Open Phones
8am - Dan Rostenkowski, Fmr. U.S. Representative (D-IL), 1959-1995
9am - Stephen Friedman, National Economic Council, Director

Orrin Hatch was on yesterday.

Leahy was supposed to be on today, but he will be on tommorrow.

So voice your questions at the host and make as much statements as possible.

Here are the phone numbers:

CALL-IN NUMBERS
Republican: [phone]
Democrat: [phone]
Others: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

And if you do call, don't forget to mention the blue slips.

Click here:

http://leahy.senate.gov/issues/nominations/november2003.html
They will be taking phones for one hour.

Here is another one:

http://www.calpundit.com/archives/002501.html

So call in and make you points if you want.

[soup]

1. unprecedented obstruction by the Democrats

Do these callers even pay the least bit of attention?

[soup]

2. Caller questioning absence of Senator Leahy this a.m.

Told he'll be on tomorrow morning.

[La_Serpiente]

3. You go woman

Clarification: Leahy will be on Thursday morning.

[La_Serpiente]

4. This guy is totally biased

The reporter from the Washington Times is totally unreasonable.

[soup]

5. Liberal judges control this country

Every time they appoint one, it sends shivers down my spine.

LOL :D next caller says get a blanket for those shivers.

[La_Serpiente]

6. Brrrrrr

:scared:

[La_Serpiente]

7. Ha

whenever that guy's dog hears Bush*, it barks.

[soup]

9. Mine came running in to see what the ruckus was about

and barked his agreement with the caller's dog.

[Ivote]

8. RESEARCH THIS

A caller just said when he read "the federalist papers" it was written that if the Supreme Court appointed a president, that the president isn't allowed to appoint Federal Judges. Does anyone know anything about this?

[La_Serpiente]

10. I haven't heard about it

but it must be pretty obscure. I'll see what I can find.

[La_Serpiente]

11. The guy from

South Carolina was pretty mad. Globalization must have hit them pretty hard.

[izzie]

12. She said to morrow and I bet he is doing something with the Sen thing.

n/t