Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How many coalition soldiers are mercenaries?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 07:58 AM
Original message
How many coalition soldiers are mercenaries?
This is one I haven't seen discussed anywhere. I heard a radio interview with someone from a South or Central American country in the "coalition of the willing."

The guy said he was proud that his poor country (Nicaragua?) could send troops to help in Iraq. The interviewer asked who was paying for the troops. The guy said "That is a diplomatic secret."

I saw on Hardball that 19 countries are sending 13,000 troops. My question is: How many of those are U.S. paid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. One is either a soldier or a mercenary, they are mutually exclusive
Edited on Wed Nov-12-03 08:10 AM by IndianaGreen
Mercenaries are not protected under international law, therefore you can summarily execute any mercenary that gets caught. Soldiers are to be treated under the Geneva Convention.

There is a debate as to whether bringing mercenaries under international law it would prevent their excesses, but I don't think that this is a view that is shared by many of the UN member nations, particularly those that have been victimized by Western mercenaries.

On edit:

More info here:

http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/0/647811bc19797fdfc125641f002d2c7e?OpenDocument
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks for the info.
My understanding of mercenaries is somewhat dated. I'm thinking more of the "Hessian" variety where a foreign state is paid for the services of its troops. I wonder what the ramifications are if we paid for the troops from some countries. Would they be mercenaries under the terms you describe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 08:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. The troops are not getting paid by the US, their leaders are
Profit is what motivates mercenaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. No surprise that King George is bringing in Hessians
Funny how history repeats itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ps1074 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
5. Here - our brave bulgarian troops
Our brave bulgarian troops in Iraq are 400. There are ongoing negotiations for 400 more. All of our troops are paid by US taxpayers dollars.

The US government paid our government 10 million dollars and promised more soon. 'Send your troops over there and we will pay' - they say. This 10 mill is for sallaries, logistics and other operations in Iraq. Our troops are in the Polish Zone near Karbala.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. The numbers of 'military contractors' is proprietary information
trade secrets are leaked even less often than 'top secrets'

There were some articles a while back (maybe summer?) speculating

on the numbers of Dyncorp et al mercenaries in Iraq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paschall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. Here's a story on this from last June
These deals, which by one estimate could cost $US250 million ($A375 million) over the next year, will enable the US to relieve some of its overworked troops and give a more international face to the American-led undertaking. But they may also draw criticism that the US partners in the reshaping of Iraq are those whose support can be bought; the "coalition of the billing", as some wags have put it.

http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/06/23/1056220539895.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC