Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AFSCME Leader on CNN's Inside Politics - cites Clark's decision...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 04:32 PM
Original message
AFSCME Leader on CNN's Inside Politics - cites Clark's decision...
... not to campaign in Iowa as a major reason he did not receive their endorsement.

Gerald McEntee, President of AFSCME, was interviewed earlier by Judy Woodruff, and I just watched her report. He says that Dean represents the values of AFSCME membership, and that the decision came down to Gephardt, Kerry, Dean and Clark. He stated that the phone call breaking the news to Dick Gephardt was difficult to make.

He then stated that he is truly a "flirt," and that the union did postpone the announcement to take a closer look at Wes Clark. He went on to say that the union was somewhat uncomfortable with Clark's campaign organization and structure, although they like him personally. They were upset when Clark's campaign made the tactical decision not to campaign in Iowa, and that he told Clark that personally. The union organization in Iowa was for Dean "all the way," he stated, and that Clark's decision not to campaign there may have cost him their endorsement.

It was a fascinating interview, and Dean and his supporters should be very pleased and energized by these very, very major endorsements.

:D
Jennifer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thank you, Jennifer! That was really
a riveting account you just gave!

And I am so happy right now! :D :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. If 'the union organization in Iowa was for dean "all the way,"'
then Clark's decision wasn't relevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Except that McEntee said he polled the Iowa union leadership...
... after Clark's decision not to campaign there. It was at that time that Iowa's AFSCME leadership gave Dean the "thumbs-up."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoneStarLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good Boost for Dean
These endorsements will be a good boost for Dean and cut into Gephardt's prestige.

Too bad my man Wes Clark decided to skip Iowa...I'd bet he could have wrangled at least one of those endorsements, but Iowa is a sinkhole unless you have a very solid campaign structure in place and lots of time on the ground, two things Clark didn't have in time to be competitive in Iowa.

It'll be interesting to see how this influences the Dean-Gephardt race in Iowa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I don't think it was a bad decision for Clark to skip Iowa, but...
... with these endorsements, and with the news coverage they're receiving, Dean will likely surge soon. If Clark doesn't finish a strong 3rd in New Hampshire, and if he doesn't absolutely win South Carolina, he'll be cooked.

Thing is, big victories by Dean in IA and NH could cause a spillover effect into South Carolina. If he emerges as the strong, solid front-runner after IA and NH, that could conceivably carry him through the primaries. Of course, Clinton employed a different strategy and was able to overcome his defeats in IA and NH in '92. Only time will tell if anyone can beat Dean at this point.

Clark's my guy, too, so I'm a little bummed about these developments.
I do wish to congratulate Dean supporters on receiving these major endorsements from our union brothers and sisters, though. No sour grapes here. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. they considered Clark
and they didn't consider Kucinich? wtf?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Actually,
I think that this speaks well of Clark as a candidate....and shows that Dean was looked at only after certain Clark factors were taken into consideration.

Clark has been in the race only a short while, yet he still was given much consideration. They liked Clark they said, which speaks of Clark's electibility. So Clark comes out not looking to bad for the wear.

I do however congratulate Dean on his union coup!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Because...
...the unions want to throw their support behind a winner. I know that's sad, but it's reality (and I'm a Kucinich donor, btw...I'm intrigued by Clark, but Dennis the Menace is the only candidate to whom I've given any money).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ajacobson Donating Member (828 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. Rub it in
d'oh

:(

I have to admit, I agree that Iowa just wasn't in the cards for Clark considering his late start but why was it necessary to announce that?

There is a grassroots campaign there, you let them take the lead and do what they can, you fly in the General a couple times, it wouldn't impress anybody but if it would have kept the AFSCME on the burner wouldn't that have been the right call?

Hindsight=20/20
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-03 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Because when Clark wins....
They will be on record on wanting to back Clark but couldn't because he wouldnt be in the running in Iowa....covering they hindsides, I believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC