Harry Reid just used Bill Frist's website poll

[kyrasdad]

Yup, Harry said before Frist pulled the poll off the website, it said 60 no!!! Guess we did a good job! Now they're slamming FOXNews... I love America!!!

[CatWoman]

1. HA HA

I missed the poll bit, but caught the Faux reference :D

[MoonAndSun]

2. Go Harry!!!

kick 'em where it hurts!

[1songbird]

3. Harry got in a great shot with the website. Hehehehehehe

[mndemocrat_29]

4. WAHOO!

I'm so glad I voted.

[denverbill]

5. Oh, so THAT'S why Frist reset the results.

I took the poll earlier and it was 60% against with 6000 votes or more. I looked again 1/2 hour ago, and there were only 800 votes or so, 90% against. That was REALLY funny.

[Greyskye]

6. What the hell is his current poll trying to say?

The text of the current poll is:
Should the Senate from exercise its Constitutional duty to provide the President's judicial nominees with an up or down vote?

:wtf: does that mean?

On edit - here is his url: http://www.senate.gov/~frist/

Edit #2: They've just changed the text again. Here's the latest:
Should the Senate exercise its Constitutional duty to provide the President's judicial nominees with an up or down vote?

OK, now that actually parses...
Latest results:
Yes 57%
No 43%

11452 Total Votes

I guess they'll just keep reseting the polls until they get the data they want...

[Hippo_Tron]

14. It basically means should the democrats stop fillibustering...

[sandnsea]

16. The Nos are up 52%-48%

Let's get back in there! It now says:

"Should the Senate minority block the body's Constitutional duty to provide the President's judicial nominees with an up or down vote?"

The answer is Yes, the Senate minority should block.

[denverbill]

7. Kicking. Don't forget this du'ers.

[mbali]

8. They changed the poll again!

This time, they flipped the question so that NO is the answer they want!

Typical Republican - they can't win fair and square, so they change the rules.

New Question: Should the Senate minority block the body's Constitutional duty to provide the President's judicial nominees with an up or down vote?

[elperromagico]

9. Every time the poll changes

EVERYONE AT DU ought to be informed. "No" is winning on the revised question; let's make sure everyone answers "Yes" on this new "Poll of the Day."

[eleny]

10. I had to read it twice. Jeez!

Voting yes, for sure. Yes, the Senators should block!

[elperromagico]

11. Schumer has a big sign

Blue with yellow letters, saying "168-4"...

[proud patriot]

13. Me too ..Vote "YES" now

:eyes:

[eleny]

12. Is Frist screwing with the poll results?

I keep refreshing and see that more and more people are voting. Sometimes the total voters # leaps by over 100 votes. Yet the percentages stay at 35% Yes and 65% No. Have they set his results ahead of time?

[Renew Deal]

15. They changed the wording...

and all kinds of stuff.

[Toucano]

17. They changed the whole question now

Still same topic, but now it there's no correct answer.

Today's Question:
Which highly qualified nominees to the federal bench are being filibustered by Senate Democrats?
Janice Rogers Brown
Carolyn Kuhl
Priscilla Owen
All of the above

What a bunch of pricks in Frist's office! I mean that in a bad way! LOL!