an interesting freeper debate, bashing neocons now!

[Mountainman]

The debate is about an article in the The Weekly Standard.

They seem to be saying that it is the fault of the neocons that Bush is in trouble.

The Bush appologists are mad at Bill Kristol and the neocons.

They will never say anything is the chimp's fault.



To: rmlew

An extroadinary piece emanating from the citadel of neo conservatism - the philosopy and its popularizers who led us into Irak.

If this is an attempt to pin the tail on the Bush admistration, it should be resisted as any policy or criticism broached by those who are blindfolded. The problem in Irak is not the lack of troops, but of intelligence or of original conception - the conception of the Weekly Standard.

The Weekly Standard wants us to stand and die for their conception, but what does victrory there mean? America will sustain casualties, but only if it sees the point.

8 posted on 11/17/2003 1:37 PM PST by nathanbedford
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies >


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1023597/posts

[pink_poodle]

1. And of course, spelling mistakes and mis-use of wording..........

aside, the general tone makes no sense whatsoever. Mere babbling as usual. sigh.

[eileen from OH]

2. Is there anything that is "hugh" or "series"?????

heeheehee

eileen from OH