Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republicans blocks Bush nominee

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
La_Serpiente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-03 04:22 PM
Original message
Republicans blocks Bush nominee
In twist, GOP blocks Bush nominee

The Senate is blocking another of President Bush’s judicial nominees — but this time it’s Republicans and not Democrats playing the role of obstructionists.

Sen. Mark Pryor (D-Ark.) last week sought unanimous consent to take up the nomination of Leon Holmes to a seat on the U.S. District Court in Arkansas.

Pryor made the request after the Judiciary Committee reported Holmes’s nomination without recommendation on a party-line vote, meaning the panel took no position on whether he should be confirmed by the full Senate.

But at least four centrist Republicans expressed doubts about Holmes, based on statements culled from some of his writings. The four are Arlen Specter (Pa.), Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins (Maine), and Kay Bailey Hutchison (Texas).

more...

http://www.thehill.com/news/111903/nominee.aspx

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Hutchinson? I thought she was a rightie also???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-03 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Geez, this nominee must be one pug-ugly person for Hutchinson...
to say nay!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-03 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. From my NARAL mailing...
It's impossible to overstate how far outside the mainstream James Leon Holmes is. He has compared pro-choice advocates to Nazis. He has written that the proper role of "...the wife is to subordinate herself to her husband." He has even suggested that women can't get pregnant from being raped.
"...the wife is to subordinate herself to her husband." I imagine this was where he lost Hutchinson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-03 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Thanks for posting this!
Yikes, I can see why even Hutchinson would be loathe to support this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maggiemay Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-03 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. ha ha ha ha ha!
Obstructionists! All of them! No rubber stamp?!?!? Unthinkable!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJerseyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-03 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hutchison is pro-choice
She supports abortion rights with restrictions. Also, she is a woman. This is the guy that has said things about how wifes should just serve their husbands. There aren't many women that would like that idea from a judge. He is more extreme than any of the judicial nominees from what I can tell.

Here are some quotes from Holmes:

"concern for rape victims is a red herring because conceptions from rape occur with the same frequency as snowfall in Miami."

"wife is to subordinate herself to her husband" and "place herself under the authority of the man."

"The abortion issue is the simplest issue this country has faced since slavery was made unconstitutional and it deserves the same response."

http://www.now.org/issues/legislat/nominees/holmes.html?printable

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-03 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hutchison
I think she's less right than others.

She voted against the FCC's new rules and there was something else but I can't remember what it was just now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-03 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. So does this mean another 39 hour debate from the repukes
this time against themselves?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressiverealist Donating Member (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-03 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. and Bush WANTS this freak
that's the scary part
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-03 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. What the hell is Pryor doing nominating this person?
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sujan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-03 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
9. was pryor serious
or just trying to make a point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-03 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. Arkies, maybe it's time Senator Pryor heard from us
Stupid me, I was hoping we'd get a Senator we didn't have to watch all the time. *sigh*

:freak:
dbt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-03 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. Third post about republican defections
This is the third post today I've seen about Republican defections from party line -- the energy bill, the medicare bill, and now this. Snowe, Collins, McCain, Sununu, and Specter. Could we be seeing a return to sanity among some of the Republicans? Could they be worried about getting re-elected if they back some of Whistle Asses stoopid ideas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC