Are Child Molesters George W. Bush and Michael Jackson finished?

[JailBush]

What does the future hold in store for this dynamic duo now that both have been accused of child abuse? Between his No Child Left Alive Act and Gulf War II, Bush has undoubtedly destroyed far more children than Michael, but the King of Pop is apparently no slouch.

On the other hand, Republicans aren't nearly as disturbed by child abuse as are pop music fans. Thus, it's quite likely that corporate pedophile George W. Bush will continue his "political" gig while Michael Jackson is forced to launch a new career, perhaps running for Mayor of Juneau, Alaska. Or Jackson might follow George Bush and Arnold Schwarzenegger's lead and get elected Governor of Nevada with no prior political experience. Thus, Campaign 2008 might pit George W. Bush against Ahnold, Michael and Hillary Clinton.

But Dubya has another advantage; his rather bizarre extended family solidly supports him, while Michael appears to be regarded as the white sheep of his family.

While Michael Jackson's moonwalking days are over, George W. Bush might soon be destroying the moon, child abuse charges be damned.

[dfong63]

1. let's not convict michael jackson before the trial

i always thought that "innocent until proven guilty" was part of the liberal ideal. but DU seems to have turned into a lynch mob where Michael Jackson is concerned. i for one am not convinced by the "evidence" (none, really) put forward so far. the guy may be a nutjob, but that doesn't mean he's guilty.