Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did anyone see the Bush IQ debunking on CSPAN this morning?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 05:18 PM
Original message
Poll question: Did anyone see the Bush IQ debunking on CSPAN this morning?
Edited on Fri Nov-21-03 05:23 PM by screembloodymurder
Several days ago, a caller mentioned that Bush had an IQ of 91. Today a whole segment was dedicated to that call and misinformation and conspiracy theories found on the net. At first, I was pissed because I've never seen CSPAN go after a caller (they even replayed the call). I've heard countless right-wing lunatics' lies go unchallenged, and here's this well-meaning, older lady getting bashed for misrepresenting Bush's IQ by a few measly points.

Then I realized, Brian felt compelled to set the record straight less the viewers actually think Bush is a moron. If he acts like a moron, talks like a moron, walks like a moron; I don't need no stinking IQ test to tell me he's a moron. So what do you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. He apparently has an IQ somewhere in the 120s,
or at least that's what his SAT scores would indicate.

To me, it's not so much that he's stupid, it's more that he's intellectually lazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enki23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. what were his SAT scores?
Edited on Fri Nov-21-03 05:29 PM by enki23
the 120 number seems pretty suspect, as that's pretty high for modern IQ test numbers for adults.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
_Jumper_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. I believe he scored a 1230
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #11
27. I read in Newsweek
That he got something like a 1203. I went through public schooling, did no SAT prep and had to work late the night before and got a 1230, thank you very much. I'm willing to bet Bush got his 1203 with his 4 years+ of private schooling, SAT prep courses I couldn't even DREAM of affording, and he likely got to sleep very early the night before. His score was probably propped up by cash. Most people on here don't have that luxury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trogdor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #27
41. The average score at Andover was 1370.
That would put Dumbya in about the 30th percentile in his farking graduating class. Maybe.

SAT scores are affected by more than your native intelligence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. To my knowledge, he hasn't taken an IQ test
The 91 IQ figure is an urban legend, spread around in e-mails a couple of years ago.

http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/bliq-bush.htm

http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/hoaxes/presiq.htm

Bush's SAT scores were
Verbal: 566
Math: 640

The 120s estimate is based on those SAT scores (which were good but not stellar considering his educational background). An IQ in the 120s is essentially average.

As I said, I don't think he's an outright idiot so much as he's just mentally lazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. No, an IQ in the 120's is considered Superior.
Average IQs range from 90 to 109. High Average is 110-119. Superior is 120-129. Very Superior is 130 and up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Self-delete
Edited on Fri Nov-21-03 05:49 PM by elperromagico
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. The most commonly used IQ tests have produced those values, not me!
It's based on statistical analysis. The test authors administered the instruments to millions of people, and produced those numbers. That's the only way the tests have any validity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CSI Willows Donating Member (182 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #17
56. then we can't be saying Bush has an IQ of 120
my IQ is 140.....Bush, he ain't the sharpest tool in the shed so I highly doubt that his is around 120.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 04:23 AM
Response to Reply #56
57. And of course, there is the possibility of dyslexia
His brother Neil is dyslexic, isn't he? George H. W. Bush was responsible for some of the most amusing verbal gaffes of the early 90s. Is George H. W. dyslexic as well?

I suspect that there is a strain of dyslexia within the Bush family that has evidenced itself in at least three members of the family (and quite possibly more).

Dubya's general distaste and lack of aptitude for reading (i.e. his insistence that staffers summarize briefing reports for him), coupled with his mangled speech patterns suggest dyslexia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donating Member ( posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. those aren't that high
Edited on Fri Nov-21-03 05:58 PM by 56kid
this actually supposed to be a reply to (1)

,,, considering Bush's background and that the SAT is biased (particularly back when he would have taken it) in a way that means white males tend to score higher on it.
 Add to my Journal Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julien Sorel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 04:35 AM
Response to Reply #15
58. That verbal score is a red flag.
Math scores can be driven up by education, but verbal scores, in my experience, are much more indicative of intellectual prowess. It takes years and years of reading and reasoning, or else a genuinely superior native intellect, to develop good language skills; math, however, as it is presented on the SATs, is simply a question of classroom education. No wonder he's so damn dumb. I think he's natively of average intelligence or so, simultaneously propped up by all the priveleges and experiences that come from being born into a wealthy, influential family, and held back by being a mentally lazy fuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. SAT scores that high
...from kids in public school indicate a reasonably high IQ. SAT scores that LOW form prep school prepared students indicate normal intelligence, at best. There's a reason the scions of the plutocrats all go to prep school, and it's not merely to avoid contaminating their offspring by exposing them to the working class. Prep schools offer small classes and a great deal of individual instruction, all dedicated to having lesser generations assume the reins of leadership from their forebears when it's time.

Public schools are geared to the golden mean, which means kids with higher IQs are pretty much left to fend for themselves in pursuing enriched course work. Therefore, like anything else, when looking at things like SAT scores, it's wise to consider the source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozone_man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
43. I agree totally.
Don't use SAT scores, especially not from a prep school, to measure intelligence. Even IQ tests do not properly account for differences in societal and ethnic backgrounds. They're made for WASPs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. I seriously doubt it was * who took 'his' SAT.
If a person has enough money finding a look alike stand-in smartypants wouldn't be difficult.

Besides, all anybody has to do is listen to the moron speak spontaneously to recognize he's really stupid. With all his family privilege and educational opportunities he can't string together a coherent sentence, and hasn't a clue about anything other than what is spoon fed him by his handlers. I'm convinced there isn't one bright filament in that dim bulb. Yep, an IQ of 91, along with a serious learning disability, seems about right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
32. Bush is no Ted Kennedy
Edited on Fri Nov-21-03 06:19 PM by Yupster
Teddy's the one who got expelled for hiring another student to take his Spanish test for him.

Abd another thing -- a friend who's in college says he can now take many of his tests for his regular college classes in his dorm room on-line. He says this is routing. If this is true, how can the teacher have any confidence that the correct student is the one taking the test? This seems nuts to me. You'd at least want the students in some kind of controlled testing center so you know who's taking the test. Anyone know if this is really true?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
39. SAT scores and IQ scores are very different things.
They correlate weakly, which doesn't mean much either. Plus IQ scores (on the most common test: WAIS) have a confidence band of 15 points (at 95% confidence level). We'll never know what his IQ is, and even if we did it wouldn't mean much. He might be a human residue, he still deserves the same respect as any human being: not to be brought down to a number, the validity of which is highly questionable anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #39
47. I agree, of course
I'm just repeating the figure I've been told in the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Funny, Brian NEVER
seems compelled to set the record straight when his friends call in and tell lies about Dems. Damn liberal media! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Not enough time to correct Republican lies.
He'd have to correct every caller.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Not enough time to correct Republican lies.
He'd have to correct every caller.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neuvocat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. The fact that they're trying to defend Bush over this
gives credence to the caller's assertion to begin with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. He is the LOLO of the Century, er, make that ALL MANKIND
I will make a thread of this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. Here's the scoop from Snopes
From snopes.com

Presidential IQ

Claim: According to a study by the Lovenstein Institute, President Bush has the lowest IQ of all presidents of past 50 years.
Status: False.

Origins:
No, this isn't a real news report, nor does it describe a real study. There isn't a "Lovenstein Institute" in Scranton, Pennsylvania (or anywhere else in the USA), nor do any of the people quoted in the story exist, because this is just another spoof that was taken too seriously.
The piece is simply a political jibe, made obvious by its ranking all the Democratic presidents of the last several decades as having high (even exceptionally high) IQs -- note that Bill Clinton's IQ is listed as being exactly twice George W. Bush's -- while ranking all the Republican presidents from the same time frame as average to moderate in intelligence, with the current president and his father assigned below-average figures placing them at the very bottom of the list. (President Nixon is the sole exception, presumably because his reputation is still so tarnished that not even a high IQ measurement can yet redeem him in the court of public opinion.)

Read more.

Sorry, everybody.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. HEY - this CLAIM is debunked
not the fact that Dubya IS INDEED A MORON and his IQ could very well be 91 - or LESS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brucey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
12. It's like Nixon saying he's not a crook.
The fact that the issue is brought up is enough. He may have a passable IQ (knowledge of words and puzzles), but he is far from being a thinker. He's written more books than he's read (1). On C-SPAN the other day the moderator said he was smart because in his speech he named John Locke. Well, we all know that someone else wrote the speech and he's just reading it. There are books full of the dumb things he has said when he is speaking on his own. He might not be officially mentally retarded, but he is nowhere near a high-IQ person or a deep thinker in any way. Perhaps that's why average people like him so much - he is just like them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
13. Did you see his performance in Britain?....I've seen him here in Canada
Edited on Fri Nov-21-03 05:41 PM by glarius
in live settings with other world leaders, where he looked like a fish out of water...Just like he seemed with Blair....He looks like it's all he can do to walk across a room, he's so tied up in knots of indecision and incomprehension....If it wasn't for his "people" who surround and protect him he would probably faint with the lack of knowledge of what he should say or do....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
14. * could end all this debate by just taking an IQ test, then publishing
its results. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
16. I think it should be noted
that the same source which produced the 91 IQ figure also gave Nixon an IQ of 155.

Here are the alleged IQ rankings of the last 12 presidents:

147 .. Franklin D. Roosevelt (D)
132 .. Harry Truman (D)
122 .. Dwight D. Eisenhower (R)
174 .. John F. Kennedy (D)
126 .. Lyndon B. Johnson (D)
155 .. Richard M. Nixon (R)
121 .. Gerald Ford (R)
175 .. James E. Carter (D)
105 .. Ronald Reagan (R)
098 .. George HW Bush (R)
182 .. William J. Clinton (D)
091 .. George W. Bush (R)

(http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/hoaxes/presiq.htm)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #16
51. My baby Clinton has the highest score of them all!
:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #51
55. That IQ figure might be close to accurate
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
22. I say he is not a moron, but is an idiot. (There is a subtle distinction
in today's American English, they are no longer essentially synonyms.)

It is somewhat analogous to the distinction between "ignorant" and "stupid."

That being said, there is evidence that his "intellect" embraces some of each of those four categories.

More than anything else, however, he is clearly a lout with some mental issues having little or nothing to do with any of them.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
23. Now if Brian and c-span would just do a segment to set the record
straight about that pesky AWOL rumor.

Something about a reward being offered to any Alabama Guradsman who could say that they served in the Alabama Guard with Shrub? Something about scrubbing his military records? Grounded from flying for refusing orders to take medical exams after they began including drug tests?

C-span viewers want to know.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
24. I say he is not a moron, but is an idiot. (There is a subtle distinction
in today's American English, they are no longer essentially synonyms.)

It is somewhat analogous to the distinction between "ignorant" and "stupid."

That being said, there is evidence that his "intellect" embraces some of each of those four categories.

More than anything else, however, he is clearly a lout with some mental issues having little or nothing to do with any of them.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
25. Now if Brian and c-span would just do a segment to set the record
straight about that pesky AWOL rumor.

Something about a reward being offered to any Alabama Guradsman who could say that they served in the Alabama Guard with Shrub? Something about scrubbing his military records? Grounded from flying for refusing orders to take medical exams after they began including drug tests?

C-span viewers want to know.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
26. I say he is not a moron, but is an idiot. (There is a subtle distinction
in today's American English, they are no longer essentially synonyms.)

It is somewhat analogous to the distinction between "ignorant" and "stupid."

That being said, there is evidence that his "intellect" embraces some of each of those four categories.

More than anything else, however, he is clearly a lout with some mental issues having little or nothing to do with any of them.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
28. Now if Brian and c-span would just do a segment to set the record
straight about that pesky AWOL rumor.

Something about a reward being offered to any Alabama Guradsman who could say that they served in the Alabama Guard with Shrub? Something about scrubbing his military records? Grounded from flying for refusing orders to take medical exams after they began including drug tests?

C-span viewers want to know.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
29. Now if Brian and c-span would just do a segment to set the record
straight about that pesky AWOL rumor.

Something about a reward being offered to any Alabama Guradsman who could say that they served in the Alabama Guard with Shrub? Something about scrubbing his military records? Grounded from flying for refusing orders to take medical exams after they began including drug tests?

C-span viewers want to know.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Tonight on "Its the Mind"....
Edited on Fri Nov-21-03 06:10 PM by JHB
...we examine the phenomenon of Deja vu, that strange feeling you sometimes get that we've lived through something before, that what is happening now has already happened...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #31
48. LOL
Python reference, very good, very good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barbara917 Donating Member (109 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
30. Is this evidence of low IQ, idiocy, stupidity, chauvinism?


Does it matter whether the behavior depicted here is a result of low IQ or not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. His way to meet girls that don't attend his family reunion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #30
61. Barbara: I was looking for that pic! (Letterman) Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
34. One step above.................
plant life. Very close though, very close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
35. I have too much difficulty
putting that name and intelligence in the same sentence. Its too difficult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Basurero Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
36. 91 seems a bit high.
Could they have meant 9 (nine)? I could understand that, going by what he's done in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #36
42. Hi Basurero!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
37. You forgot the category: IQ less than that of the average houseplant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
38. Years of alcohol abuse and heaven knows what other drugs
would undoubtedly have reduced his I.Q. by the simple destruction of brain cells.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elperromagico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #38
49. As would lack of intellectual stimulation n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devinsgram Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
40. Mine is 116 and I know I'm a lot smarter then
he is. My dog is smarter. My cats are smarter. I've seen a bag of hammers smarter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #40
60. O' Brother
a bag of hammers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susu369 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
44. The program just reinforced that Snopes is quite pro-Bush
Barbara Mikkelson bragged about her research regarding the IQ's and then admitted she did not know what Clinton's IQ was.

Hello? Researcher?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
45. IQ of 666 but he's dyslexic?
sounds like a joke Bush might attempt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
46. Where's dumb as a bag of hammers?
or Not the sharpest knife in the drawer?

"Potatos are smrter"
-Dan Quayle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #46
50. That would be Potatoes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. IQ does not relate to sensibility
Edited on Fri Nov-21-03 10:01 PM by quaker bill
I have known some fripping genius lunatics. PhD's that I would not trust to care for my dog.

On the other hand, I would want to see the test results before I would believe Bush has an IQ of 120. 100 to 110 maybe. The man should have been a plumber.

Of course 1200 on the SAT is not all that high for President of the United States.

I did substantially better than that hungover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #46
54. You mean: "PotatoEs are smarter"
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
53. outrageous
In all the days I've watched Washington Journal I've never seen a call refuted. A close question might be asked, but never anything like what Lamb has done.

Rove must have leaned on Lamb.

I'd call and get mad, but I have to watch the replay. 4 a.m. is just too early for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 04:36 AM
Response to Original message
59. depends on how you define "stupid"
Oxford dictionary aside - this is how I define stupidity vs ignorance

Ignorance is when you don't know something because of a lack of knowledge/experience
example: Don't know how to re-wire a house because you've never been taught

Stupidity is when you know better but go ahead and do it anyways
example: You know driving intoxicated is dangerous but you slam down severl drinks and get behind the wheel anyways

Baghdad Bush KNOWS better but goes ahead anyways = STUPIDITY

it has nothing to do with IQ scores or intuitive abilities - it has to do with common sense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC