Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Total CRAP on the History Channel.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Archae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 03:14 AM
Original message
Total CRAP on the History Channel.
There's this series of shows that the History Channel keeps dredging up and running, called "The Men Who Killed Kennedy."

Like ALL such shows, they are very long on wild accusations, and extremely short on actual evidence.

And the suckers who believe this crap fall for it.

History Channel errs with 'outrageous' assassination series

By Bud Kennedy
Star-Telegram Staff Writer

Who killed JFK?

Maybe I did. Or you.

I was 8. The record will show that I was present in class that day at South Hi Mount Elementary School.

What's your alibi? Hmmm?

Better think one up quickly. Before this week is out, a cable TV series may blame the assassination on you or me or anyone alive in Texas in 1963.

Maybe my entire fourth-grade class was hiding behind the grassy knoll. Or maybe hundreds of gun-toting Texans were lurking in the Texas School Book Depository. Or maybe those TV reporters shot the president. They all seemed mighty excited over the first 'round-the-clock TV news crisis.

Honestly, are those ideas any more foolish than the thesis of a British series this week on the so-called History Channel, blaming the assassination on a conspiracy of powerful Texans -- including then-Vice President Lyndon Johnson?

Even Oliver Stone's JFK didn't try to sell a story this wild. And that was a movie fairy tale.

"It's sick," Liz Carpenter, the former press secretary for Lady Bird Johnson, said Wednesday from Austin. "It's outrageous and unconscionable for the History Channel to show something like that."

http://www.dfw.com/mld/startelegram/news/local/7307745.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yowzayowzayowza Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 03:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. Too bad ...
Edited on Mon Nov-24-03 03:28 AM by yowzayowzayowza
The article doesn't actually deal with the facts supporting the "show" and falsely claims it smears staff members. Valenti isn't even mentioned in the "show."

"Sadly, President Johnson and the staff members who are wrongly smeared by the conspiracy theorists are no longer alive to defend themselves," Tom Johnson said in a statement co-signed by former LBJ aide Jack Valenti, president of the Motion Picture Association of America. "The History Channel has distorted history beyond recognition."

On edit: Itz guaranteed to be entertaining when the "good ole boys" start goin' at each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RummyTheDummy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 04:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. Back and to the left.....back and to the left.....back and to the left.
That's all the proof I need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalcapitalist Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. they blame it on a right-wing conspiracy
of which LBJ was a part of. It isn't that far-fetched, dude. I mean, tapes show that LBJ and J Edgard Hoover were in cahoots, and we know the tactics Hoover used and his hatred of Kennedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. I am locking this
From the GD posting rules:

Rules to start discussion threads in the General Discussion forum.

1. The subject line of a discussion thread must accurately reflect the actual content of the message.

2. The subject line of a discussion thread and the entire text of the message which starts the thread may not include profanity, excessive capitalization, or excessive punctuation. Inflammatory rhetoric should also be avoided.

3. If you post an article or other published content which is from a conservative source or which expresses a traditionally conservative viewpoint, you must state your opinion about the piece and/or the issues it raises.

4. If you wish to start a vanity thread (ie: a discussion thread in which the sole purpose is to share your personal opinion) you must state your opinion in a non-inflammatory manner which respects differences in opinion and facilitates actual discussion.

5. You may not start a new discussion thread in order to continue a current or recent flame war from another thread. The moderators have the authority to lock threads in order to contain flaming on a particular topic to only one thread at a time.


NYer99
DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC