Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cloture passes ... then daschle comes out

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 01:20 PM
Original message
Cloture passes ... then daschle comes out
Sites the bill up for vote being against the budget rules. This party aint over yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. looks like a long day for the Senators
it'll go back and forth all day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Frist asks for waiver on budget act rules.
This also requires 60 votes to pass. so we are back in a cloture vote type scenario. Or filibuster if you will. Gonna be a long day like you said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Thanks for posting this, Egnever. Hope lives!
Bill Nelson will no doubt vote against waiving the budget act. Perhaps this is what his office meant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Sorry, the 1975 Budget Act is clear
Frist can't waive it.. It'll be unconstitutional if it passes, which violates OTHER laws involving Medicare.

Hawkeye-X
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msmcghee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. Help with point of order.
Can someone here point me to a clear explanation what "point of order" actually means? HawkeyeX maybe.

I've heard it used many times - but I've never really understood it. I always thought it was quibbling over process and not really important. But here, it looks like it can actally kill the bill. Is that correct?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Yes this can/will kill the bill unless.....
The senate votes to waive the rule, wich requires 60 votes{same as cloture vote} to pass. So we are basically back where we were before the cloture vote but given more time for debate.

You know if i didnt find the prospect of this thing passing so frightening. This would be very entertaining. Or maybe its very entertaining because the prospect of it passing is so frightening.

This stuff is better than any cliffhanger I have ever seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goobergunch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. Point of Order - raised when something violates the rules
If sustained and not waived, the something dies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well at least he is trying to do something.
Though I still feel he should have voted against cloture and supported the filibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Actually this is smart
It acts almost exactly the same as a filibuster as it requires the same 60 votes to waive the rules in the budget act. So this allows more debate and forces the repugs to go on record as bending the rules in order to pass this thing. It will be interesting to see where this goes. It has the potential to kill it on procedural grounds before an actual vote ever hapens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nostamj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. IMAGINE that!
REPUBLICANS changing the RULES to get what they want.

what will they think of next?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Kinda like what they did
to get it through the House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Exactly!
I sure home Daschle knows what he's doing. If he stops this bill from passing, he just may have saved his job as minority leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DancingBear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
42. Do I detect a hint of sarcasm in your voice?

snit, snit, snit. :) :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bain_sidhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Did you hear his intro?
He said, basically, that there are more rules/proceedures about which a point of order can be raised... Have a feeling he's planning to raise more than this one, with each one taking a two hour (at least) debate to resolve.

Crafty. I like it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. what is Daschle trying to do with this argument?
is there something going on behind the scenes we do not know about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Cost of bill exceeds the $400 budgeted in the Budget Act of 2004.
Without 60 votes, this bill is pulled from the floor on a point of order, that is busts the budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Perhaps this is a better tactic
Edited on Mon Nov-24-03 01:39 PM by prolesunited
They have already painted the Dems as uncooperative and playing politics with the people's business. If they went with the filibuster, it would have been cast as more of the same.

By doing it this way, he is actually forcing the Repugs to vote in favor of busting the budget. Can you imagine that — the GOP having to say the want to create more debt. Whose the party of big spenders now? :evilgrin:

If it plays out right, this is VERY shrewd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Agreed! Make the pugs vote for driving the country further into debt
This is very crafty indeed. My hopes are renewed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. Driving the country into debt to line the pockets of HMO's and Big Pharma
Bush probably added another dozen Pioneers to the fold today. The Bush administration has sold out the true fiscal conservatives like McCain to pad his warchest and make his buddies rich.

That is the real story of this bill. The billions of taxpayers money going into politically connected inefficient private insurance plans, and into Big Pharma companies. They are the only ones who truly win today.

Daschle is making sure these guys are covered thick in tar before they go home to explain this atrocity to their constituents. Watch closely, they will get as much heat from the consevatives back home as they will from the seniors who are being sold a lemon with the old bait and switch technique so beloved by this administration.

Good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. the prescription drug bill defies budget rules..
By over spending outside of the budget and because of this it can not be enacted without changing the rules on budget spending. It forces Republicans to admit they are no longer fiscaly responsible in order to get this bill passed. I think its a smart tack. Also it requires a supermajority to waive the rules so esentially a filibuster is still in effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bain_sidhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. I suspect he's just doing a de-facto fillibuster
Couldn't pass the real fillibuster, so he's going to raise point of order after point of order, each one requiring two hours (at least) to resolve.

GO TOM!

(Hey, credit where it's due!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Yup. The 1974 Budget Act is very clear
The medicare bill will die where it is intended -- on procedural grounds, and it'll be shat upon, slapped around and the original copy of the bill (all 17,000 pages) shoved up Frist's ass for trying to steal more money for his interests (family owns HCA)

Hawkeye-X
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1songbird Donating Member (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. I hope you're right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snellius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. I think he's trying to force the Repubs to show their true hand
The more Repubs have to try to explain this the more they will have to confess how dishonest and corrupt this bill is. Why else are they trying to rush and ram it through congress in only a couple of days? Even if the bill passes, the Repubs will have a hard time stealing the issue. It may even end up their MedIraq, a "mission accomplished" they wish they had never wished for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virgdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
14. I was wondering why so many Democrats voted for cloture -
made me think that the Dems had a few tricks up their sleeves. This one is not over until the fat lady sings, and I don't hear her singing just yet. Go Dems and kill this horrible POS bill that should never have seen the light of day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creativelcro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. obviously, they did not have the votes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyler Durden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
19. Daschle many not be far left, but he's not STUPID.
When you know you're going lose cloture, you work on parliamentary procedure and rules violations.

VERY shrewd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creativelcro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
25. Gosh, did you see
Edited on Mon Nov-24-03 02:09 PM by creativelcro
the thickness of the book Graham just patted on ?... Who could possibly read the entire thing ??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silverhair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
27. Wasted effort. His Point of Order has to pass by 60 votes.
Since cloture passed by 70-29, that means that 30 senators would have to change their mind. This party is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creativelcro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. I thought it was the other way around... 10 senators...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Not necessarily...
Edited on Mon Nov-24-03 02:19 PM by Tatiana
Eleven Senators would only have to agree to enforce procedural rules, otherwise they would have to then change the rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creativelcro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. the other side needs 60 votes.
Edited on Mon Nov-24-03 02:27 PM by creativelcro
We only need 40. Boxer made it clear. So, only 11 additional people have to vote NO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bain_sidhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #27
43. No... not wasted... gives cover to
Senators who might not want the bill, but are afraid to vote against it. Voting for the point of order is a vote to enforce the budget resolution. It's completely different from voting against the Medicare "prescription drug benefit" (translation, "steal from Gram and Gramps to enrich drug companies and HMOs")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
31. Boxer up now
busts the budget by giving away millions $ to HMO's & pharma cos.
we're willing to spend money for the seniors, not to the others who don't need it...
dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creativelcro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Boxer could barely lift the darn thing!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonAndSun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. There is so much I do not know about how the Senate is run.
but obviously Frist "The Majority Leader" doesn't either. Daschle is doing something that I thought was not possible, actually trying to stop a repuke runaway train. Color me shocked but very impressed. Let's hope the Dems can do this and have the Medicare "crap" put downt the toilet where it belongs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
35. now pRick S up
:puke: don't what he's saying cuz he's on mute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creativelcro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. He's crying unfair
'cause the cloture vote already happened and Dems are still using procedural obstruction...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
36. Santorum......."This is tantamount to a filibuster."
Man I hope so! GO DEMS!!!! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creativelcro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. They did not complain
when the HOUSE stole the vote a few nights ago...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. No shit.
They're such h a bunch of hypocrites!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
39. "You're either for this bill or you're not for this bill."
Santorum is such a whiny ass bastard. I hope the Dems cram that bill right where it belongs! Down the throat or up the behinds of the republicans!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KayLaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. My Goodness!
Santorum sure is upset. It's hard to listen because he keeps repeating himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
44. This is great! It shows the importance of

parliamentary procedure in Congress and other large organizations. Most of us laugh at parliamentary procedure in our club meetings but that's because club members all pretty much agree with each other. (But what are the exceptions in club unanimity? Expenditures! Money always matters.)

Nickles is up now, referring to Daschle as "the Democrat leader." I'm so sick of that grammatically incorrect meme of theirs. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
45. Durbin connects the dots of United Health Care to AARP!
Edited on Mon Nov-24-03 03:11 PM by DemBones DemBones

Newt Gingrich was tied into Golden Rule Insurance (an Illinois company)
which has been bought out by United Health Care, which is tied to AARP, i.e.
GOP pays off buddies in insurance industry AGAIN!

It's complicated so I'll replay it on TiVo and transcribe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creativelcro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
46. Reps are cracking...
Grassle made a stupid comments about the exact number of pages in the bill!... is that the best argument they have??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creativelcro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-24-03 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
47. they are voting on the P.O.O. soon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC