Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Frank Luntz: Democratic primary voters don't want religious talk...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 07:40 PM
Original message
Frank Luntz: Democratic primary voters don't want religious talk...
Edited on Wed Nov-26-03 07:41 PM by wyldwolf
... said Clark lost points in the debate for his personal spirituality lines.

Said this isn't the general election. Democrats are wary of religion mixed with politics and to primary voters, this kind of talk is a no-no.

Thoughts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Julien Sorel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe Clark should work harder on the script.
Vet it some more ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Frank Luntz...
Is an ancephalic goon. His opinions on anything regarding Democrats are worthless as used toilet paper.

Clark could have revealed, and proved, himself as The Second Coming and Luntz would have spun it negative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. I almost never agree with Luntz but on this I do
Religion is a private matter and should stay that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. He's warning Democrats away from it which plays right into Bush's hands.
Dems should say and do whatever they feel is natural for them. Listening to Luntz advise Dems is liking taking a bite out of the poisoned apple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. He had the male/female automated bar graph going...
... showing where the various candidates lost points among males and females by the things they said.

Very interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. He also heaped more praise on Howard Dean. Surprise, surprise.
Warned Gep and Kerry to stop going after Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
littlejoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Luntz is part of the problem.
He is going to do everything he can do, in a subtle manner, and sometimes not so subtly to put a negative spin on anything democratic. In short, the man is EVIL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salinen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Luntz
will do anything to destroy us. If he has any suggestions for democrats, do the opposite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmericanDem Donating Member (521 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. Luntz is the...
Dead squirrel wearing repuke polster that also said Dean won the last deabate. Need we say more?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. Do you mean Republican pollster Frank Luntz...
...that everyone conveniently forgets to mention is a Republican pollster all of a sudden like? Is that the guy you are talking about here?

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mlawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. So, Luntz is implying that the repukes are the 'religious' party?
That should help them with their base...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Impy hell. I don't remember the exact words he used, but he came...
...damn close to identifying the Democratic party as the party of the anti-Christ. In so many words, he did. Tweety sat there nodding in agreement. The pricks.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
12. Democratic primary voters don't want their polling done by a Repug.
How irritating it is to hear the latest about
how Dems are doing from conservative pollers
and hacks hired by the cable "news" networks.
Gads, the least they could do is hire someone
known to be a Dem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
funkyflathead Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
13. About time some one said this
Seperate your religeous beliefs from your public service folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. Why? Don't we still have religious freedom in this country?
Last time I checked that freedom even goes for presidents. The Republicans would just love to have a lock on everyone who votes that is religious. What do we gain with that? 4 more years of a Chimp in charge? Fuck that. I will gladly take a portion of the religious vote next year to beat Bush if that is what it takes to win. Wouldn't you? Or are you going to say no thanks, take you vote elsewhere (to Bush)?

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
14. Since when are Republican Pollsters Democratic Primary experts?
Bizarre.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salinen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. This fucker Luntz
is Tweeties bitch. First we get polls. Then we get "reality" poll shows. "Boinc,boinc,boinc," sound of stabbing myself in the eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
16. How else do you explain the decline of Lieberman?
It's certainly not his personality that's the problem...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmericanDem Donating Member (521 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. yes it is
Lieberman can care less about fellow dems. he has done everything to slander them. Hence his standing in the polls. I had nothing but the strongest prais for Lieberman prior to his bid for pres.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmandaRuth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
17. BSBSBSBSBSBS
One of the reasons I became active (going to a dem meeting) tonight was to help reclaim the dem party as the true party of Christians, we are our brothers (and sisters) keepers and gov can make a difference in peoples lives. I think people are crying out to hear and are hungry for a message of hope and change. my humble opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tlb Donating Member (611 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
19. May I point out the regular " Holy Joe" sneers ?
Luntz isn't saying anything that isn't already clear. And it's going to bite the nominee in the rear end.

America as a nation is not hostile to personal faith.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
21. Frank Luntz....
is a ugly girl who dresses like a man to divert away from his ugliness. He's Karl Roves' lost twin!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kathleen04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
23. At the...
Presidential Candidates Forum on Women's issues (http://www.c-span.org/search/basic.asp?ResultStart=1&ResultCount=10&BasicQueryText=forum+on+women%27s+issues), the candidates were all asked about their faiths. I think it has a neutral effect, at least on me. I can respect and appreciate the candidate's personal faiths, but I also know that it's separate from leadership. Obviously people do identify with candidates who are similar to them, but I do not see it as a defining issue in this situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
24. "When you pray, pray in private, lest any man should boast"
Works for me. Frankly, I don't give a shit if you worship Ba'al, just do it out of the public eye.

And why just limit that to the primaries? I don't care for candidates wrapping themselves in the Shroud of Turin for the Big Show, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-03 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Do you think Bush is going to comply with your wishes concerning religion?
Don't count on it. He knows what side his bread is buttered on. If we can get some fundies to vote for our guy due to a little inspirational religious pandering to garner their votes, I say go for it. If we don't the Republicans will be glad to do it. Why? Not because they are religious. It is because they are smart. They know what works and what it takes to win.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
26. Pay no attention to Luntz
He's a Republican hack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fairfaxvadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. maybe the aversion isn't religion per se..
maybe it is folks on the alert for getting hi-jacked by fake religious claptrap such as that dished out by Shrub and his ilk. I find myself being a bit on-guard with the religious talk and I hate having to feel that way.

I think the GOP has made being "Christian" synonymous with "Money" and "Selfishness" and "If You are Poor you Must Deserve It", so yes, many of us cringe now when religion is brought up in the political realm.

Hard to believe Kennedy overcame the obstacles of being a Catholic over 40 years ago. We sure haven't come very far.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Oh, I cringe as well.
But coming from Frank Luntz, even something I might agree with I have to wonder what his agenda really is and what he's really trying to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. What Luntz is saying is that the religious vote belongs to the Republicans
So you Democrats had better leave it be for us, because we Republicans know what is best for you. That is exactly what he is trying to say. Take it to the bank.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
29. This is Luntz's Sick Way of Telling Americans All Dems Are Atheists.
He is so transparent in his hostility towards the Democratic Party that he sometimes thinks he is a bit too smart.

I'd like to have 15 minutes with Luntz on a stage. That would be fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. you got it!
Luntz has an agenda and it's not to help Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #29
32. You damn right David. You are spot on...again n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fairfaxvadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. and check out the main WP page on this topic...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/

They are all in on it....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. Thanks. Here are some snips
A Spiritual Struggle for Democrats
Silence on Religion Could Hurt Candidates

By Jim VandeHei
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, November 27, 2003; Page A01


The nine Democratic presidential candidates all consider themselves religious, though most keep their faith and spiritual views to themselves when campaigning.

Their silence stands in contrast to President Bush, among the most overtly religious presidents in generations, and could undermine the Democratic nominee, as polls consistently show that voters want to hear more about faith from their national leaders.

Democrats "have been very hesitant to talk about faith . . . and in doing so we have lost a connection with a lot of people," said Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman (Conn.), an Orthodox Jew and one of only two candidates who frequently talk about God. Long-shot candidate Al Sharpton, an ordained minister, is the other. "Democrats ought to pay attention to the fact that the two Democrats who have been elected president since Johnson were Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton . . . and both talked a lot about their faith," Lieberman said.

In interviews, most of the candidates said they are uncomfortable discussing their faith as publicly as Bush does or Clinton did. Yet most agreed the party must do a better job of connecting with religious voters, or risk not winning the White House in 2004.

Voters "want leaders, particularly a president, who they trust and who they think is a good person," said Sen. John Edwards (N.C.), who was baptized a Southern Baptist at age 16 but has joined the Methodist Church. "If you are a person of faith, I think it adds weight to that issue of whether you are a good person." snip


An overwhelming majority of Americans consider themselves religious. A recent poll conducted by the nonpartisan Pew Research Center found that nearly 70 percent of Democrats and 80 percent of Republicans expressed strong religious beliefs when asked questions designed to measure these attitudes.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsw_81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. Articles like that make me cringe
As an atheist, I find it extremely frustrating to see how religious this country is. And it sickens me to see how so many people seem to think that you can't be a moral person without believe in a bunch of primitive superstition like fundamentalist Xtianity.

I look forward to the day when openly atheist/agnostic candidates can run for public office and actually have a chance of being elected. This is happening in Europe and Canada, so why not here? Why must we always be so backward?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 03:06 AM
Response to Original message
36. Luntz is lying to smear all Dems as being anti-religious. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC